Non-MMA Sports Betting Discussion - June, 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blue Jays -1.5 (-110) risk: 2u
Tigers (-104) risk: 1.5u
 
Dodgers/Reds o10.5
Yankees/A's o9.5
Indians -140
Cardinals/Orioles o10.5

All to win 1u

EDIT: Added Royals/Angels o9
 
Last edited:
Hey Blue Jays:

James Shields sucks. There's a high chance that he's going to walk you if you don't swing at every pitch he throws. Stop being idiots and work the count.

Sincerely ignp
 
Blue Jays -1.5 (-110) risk: 2u
Tigers (-104) risk: 1.5u
split the games, at least i won the bigger one. I'm looking into the Sunday night game and im leaning Astros. not sure if ill make a bet or not, ill post if i do
 
Rockies :D
Came thru after blowing the lead in the 8th.
 
Kershaws ml is about -300 tomorrow vs mets. Took the 1.5 at -140

No strong leans besides dodgers tomorrow. Maybe astros over line. Seattle over Detroit. Might make a small play on pads at +220
 
Leans right now are
Indians -153
Rays -135

I can't justify that price on Kershaw. He barely pulled out a 1 run win the last game I bet on him.
 
Where is the line for Houston vs as?

So I took dodgers ml today for 3u

Leans for Houston, giants, seattle.

Dogs I like are padres and orioles
 
I had to avoid the computer for most of the weekend since I didn't watch the UFC live. I hope some people made money on the US Open. I hit every bet by fading the big names that were in contention.
 
Ended up going rather large today

Dodgers 3u ml
Dodgers 1.4u run line
Houston .67u
Houston over 5 .4u
Giants .63u
Os over 4 .4u
Nats .2u
Nats over 5 .2u
 
Locked in

Tampa first 5 -158
Houston first 5 -153
Dodgers -.5 first 5 -175
 
Feel like I have to be missing something simple, but can anyone explain to me what this draft prop on 5d is?

"ACC Players Drafted Overall -1.5 +105"

Or "UCLA Players Drafted Overall -240"

Does it mean more than any other conference/team? That's all I can think of
 
Feel like I have to be missing something simple, but can anyone explain to me what this draft prop on 5d is?

"ACC Players Drafted Overall -1.5 +105"

Or "UCLA Players Drafted Overall -240"

Does it mean more than any other conference/team? That's all I can think of

Acc players drafted overall is against ucla players drafted overall at +1.5 -135 meaning if you took the acc you are saying that conference will
have 2 more players drafted than ucla players.

The ucla total players drafted is -240 vs Oregon players drafted at +180
 
The draft props I took for Thursday are under 3.5 duke players drafted in first round -165 (kennard Giles and tatum. I think Jackson goes in the second)

This one is juicy but should easily hit over 2.5 Kentucky players drafted -360 in the first round (monk and fox are locks and I feel adebayo will go mid to late first)
 
Acc players drafted overall is against ucla players drafted overall at +1.5 -135 meaning if you took the acc you are saying that conference will
have 2 more players drafted than ucla players.

The ucla total players drafted is -240 vs Oregon players drafted at +180

Oh alright, thanks. Must have been the layout on my phone since I feel like I should have been able to understand that.

Abd I definitely like that u3.5 for Duke guys. Wouldn't shock me if Kennard falls out even, despite mocks now having him in the lottery.

I'm considering Pac 12 +3.5 1st round vs ACC at +115. Feel like at most they'd be down 3.

Also like UCLA overall -240 against Oregon. UCLA has 3 guaranteed in Ball, Leaf, and Ike. Probably pushes with Bell, Dorsey, and Brooks all being drafted, but one could slip and I doubt Boucher gets taken. Plus Hamilton could maybe slip in late. Plus they give UCLA a better chance of o2.5 for the first round than Oregon gets o2.5 at all.
 
Last edited:
Can kind of freeroll Tatum and Fox in the draft. Tatum o4.5 at even and Fox o4.5 at +125. One of them has to go 5th unless Jackson takes a tumble, but that'd be surprising
 
Can kind of freeroll Tatum and Fox in the draft. Tatum o4.5 at even and Fox o4.5 at +125. One of them has to go 5th unless Jackson takes a tumble, but that'd be surprising
For what it's worth I think either Tatum or Jackson is going 3
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top