UFC 217 - Bisping vs GSP - NYC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Son. Vick is 7-1 because he fights bums. Horrible thing to use as a reason to bet him. He's not a good fighter. LOL @ out of depth on the ground just because Vick d'arced washed up, post USADA vegan Trujillo. He has zero wrestling and his defence is laughable. It's clear as day Duffy is more skilled.
I've got third-party tracked profitability linked on my profile. I'd take the 'bums' that Vick's 7-1 against over anybody that Duffy's fought. You're getting caught up in the clearest public trap line we've seen in a while, since the smart money is never going to be on Duffy being undervalued since he's got such a massive public push.

You're even on the same side as Luca, who's bleeding money damned fast. Nobody's on Vick since they like him, but simply because he represents #elitevalue at his current price-point. Duffy wishes he was fit to kiss the boots of Disabled Trujillo. Don't bet on hyped fighters from countries with legalized gambling. It's the same logic that let me put a ton on unsexy Ilir Latifi to maul Tyson Pedro.
 
I'm honestly growing tired of the mocking attitude some people are displaying.

Some of us think Vick has a good chance, or close to 50/50.. you think Duffy has value.. great.. but a little common general respect would be nice.

Some think Gsp has a path to victory and frankly, bisping isn't a world beater.. others are mocking anyone who plays him moreso than trying to explain why they feel that way.

Etc etc. It's just a prevailing theme lately that is growing tiresome..

Not saying we all need to kumbaya, but still.
 
I've got third-party tracked profitability linked on my profile. I'd take the 'bums' that Vick's 7-1 against over anybody that Duffy's fought. You're getting caught up in the clearest public trap line we've seen in a while, since the smart money is never going to be on Duffy being undervalued since he's got such a massive public push.

You're even on the same side as Luca, who's bleeding money damned fast. Nobody's on Vick since they like him, but simply because he represents #elitevalue at his current price-point. Duffy wishes he was fit to kiss the boots of Disabled Trujillo. Don't bet on hyped fighters from countries with legalized gambling. It's the same logic that let me put a ton on unsexy Ilir Latifi to maul Tyson Pedro.

Latifi was clearly the right side cos pedro was so green and unproven. Duffy has 18 fights plus pro boxing experience. One unit on vick clearly reflects your confidence.
 
I've got third-party tracked profitability linked on my profile. I'd take the 'bums' that Vick's 7-1 against over anybody that Duffy's fought. You're getting caught up in the clearest public trap line we've seen in a while, since the smart money is never going to be on Duffy being undervalued since he's got such a massive public push.

You're even on the same side as Luca, who's bleeding money damned fast. Nobody's on Vick since they like him, but simply because he represents #elitevalue at his current price-point. Duffy wishes he was fit to kiss the boots of Disabled Trujillo. Don't bet on hyped fighters from countries with legalized gambling. It's the same logic that let me put a ton on unsexy Ilir Latifi to maul Tyson Pedro.
Nah there's no public push here bud. -161 for a fighter who's better everywhere is great.
 
Latifi was clearly the right side cos pedro was so green and unproven. Duffy has 18 fights plus pro boxing experience. One unit on vick clearly reflects your confidence.
I'm not saying I'm 100% confident in a Vick win. I'm mostly playing devil's advocate since the only other pick I've got that's going to get an argument for is Bisping-GSP u2.5 rounds, and I'll admit that's irrational and based on gut feel.
 
Nah there's no public push here bud. -161 for a fighter who's better everywhere is great.

I'm on Duffy since I think the fight stays standing and he's got a hand speed and technique advantage over Vick. But to say that Duffy is better everywhere just isn't true. Vick is better in the clinch, at very long range, and is probably better at finding opportunistic submissions. He's also more battle tested.

Duffy has not beaten anyone in the UFC that is anywhere near the level of guys Vick has been able to beat. You can disagree on predictions, but I don't see how you can disagree with that specific fact since it's as clear as day.
 
I'd rather take the money from the bookie. I like his r1/2 prop. I took some rose r1 +2400 or something.

This is a great bet...Rose finishing ability getting so underrated by markets. Don't see any reason why she won't be able to do it.
 
Dude Sage is terrible, and is a lightweight. You can’t actually believe that was a good showcase of Gall’s skills. I don’t think Sage has stopped a takedown from anyone ever so who cares if Gall got him down again Sage is a lightweight who moved up to fight Gall. Pulling guard, & throwing sloppy ass punches as you look to be tiring significantly against a bum is not good.

I believe it's ridiculous to try to act as though he was having trouble in that fight and say ridiculous things like he was shooting "desperate takedowns". He never even missed a takedown. And you have to remember he is fighting Randy Brown, a guy who constantly gives up position. Look at how easy he folded once Graves had his back. Montano was having his way with him on the ground too. I really don't think Brown is a big step up in competition from Northcutt.
 
TJ at +170 now

I think 5d wants me to log back on
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top