- Joined
- Mar 7, 2006
- Messages
- 24,732
- Reaction score
- 51,634
Of course this is a relative question. The article below got me wondering what most people's consensus is however.. I'd say overall the answer would be yes, "trusted"
However it certainly can't be denied Police officers are absolutely in a position which if abused could have devastating effects on civilians.
Who guards the guards?
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/n...ll-testify-investigation-database/2233386001/
Oddly this article has been update in the future: "Updated 2:26 p.m. CDT Oct. 17, 2019"
The first case noted in the article sounds outlandish on many levels.. 25 year sentence for DWI.
Question: Should a police officer's background be relevant in a case to prosecution?
In the Article:
However it certainly can't be denied Police officers are absolutely in a position which if abused could have devastating effects on civilians.
Who guards the guards?
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/n...ll-testify-investigation-database/2233386001/
Oddly this article has been update in the future: "Updated 2:26 p.m. CDT Oct. 17, 2019"
The first case noted in the article sounds outlandish on many levels.. 25 year sentence for DWI.
Question: Should a police officer's background be relevant in a case to prosecution?
In the Article:
The investigation found:
- Thousands of people have faced criminal charges or gone to prison based in part on testimony from law enforcement officers deemed to have credibility problems by their bosses or by prosecutors.
- At least 300 prosecutors’ offices across the nation are not taking steps necessary to comply with the Supreme Court mandates. These places do not have a list tracking dishonest or otherwise untrustworthy officers. They include big cities such as Chicago and Little Rock and smaller communities such as Jackson County, Minnesota, and Columbia County, Pennsylvania.
- In many places that keep lists, police and prosecutors refuse to make them public, making it impossible to know whether they are following the law.
- Others keep lists that are incomplete. USA TODAY identified at least 1,200 officers with proven histories of lying and other serious misconduct who had not been flagged by prosecutors. Of those officers, 261 were specifically disciplined for dishonesty on the job.