Whoever beats Jon Jones has to come to bang

Bad Karate said:
A proud hater if that ain't the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.

But USADA wasn't suspect when they found the picogram huh?

Now that they found Jones innocent you pathetic, loser, picopenis pussboys wanna try to change facts to fit your narrative.
Click to expand...
<24>
 
eighterumg5 said:
We can agree to disagree about Jon but there's no need to be an ass about it.
Click to expand...
Your "im a proud hater" quote deserves ridicule. Lol the funny thing is im not even a Jones fan, i just can't stand haters.
 
Captain Herb said:
Jon Jones has three reactions to pressure, he may try to clinch up, he may try to counter with an elbow or forearm, but most often he sticks his fingers out at eye level and runs backwards. This is when he is most vulnerable. Whoever beats Jon Jones will put him on his back foot and track him down. I don't know if Reyes is the guy but he needs to be looking to get of first and often with combos and he needs to swing for the fences when the opportunity arises.
Click to expand...
That's what Santos did, and with a good leg he may very well have win that match. That said, they've got to stop trying to throw bombs at his head. He's tall and long, a full step out for him is 2 for anybody else, and he's quick to get out of the way.
 
Probably. Skill wise, very very few stack up well with him. So he definitely needs to be shell shocked I think to get a victory over him. Someone who can breach his ability to range find and distance dictate, step inside with powerful hooks and shots down the middle inside of Jons effective range. It won't be as effective a strategy as it is in boxing against taller guys because jon has the option of just clinching up and going for grappling when his range gets breached. But it's really the only thing you can do cause if you stand out at range and try to pot shot jon will just front kick and oblique kick you into submission. Maybe someone can formulate a wrestling strat against him prioritizing top position cause we've never really seen jon have to spend any extended time on his back. But certainly a tall order with his grappling ability and leverage to get him down to the mat and controlled.
 
Lukn4trbl said:
He has to be able to Bang, or have higher undetectable picos
Click to expand...

Funny that you think concentrations of a substance so tiny as to be undetectable gives him such an unstoppable advantage.
 
djason1988 said:
That's what Santos did, and with a good leg he may very well have win that match. That said, they've got to stop trying to throw bombs at his head. He's tall and long, a full step out for him is 2 for anybody else, and he's quick to get out of the way.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Santos had the right strategy but was hampered by injury. You saw glimpses of it early on with Machida.
 
Mohawk Mauler said:
Yeah i know right!

All these pro fighters are dumb as fuck for not figuring out such a simple plan to beat the scrawny guy with chicken legs.

Ya goof.
Click to expand...
The point isn't so much getting a plan against Jones, It's executing it. It's going to take a certain mental attitude that we haven't really seen except for Santos and Gus 1. DC tried hard
 
Captain Herb said:
Jon Jones has three reactions to pressure, he may try to clinch up, he may try to counter with an elbow or forearm, but most often he sticks his fingers out at eye level and runs backwards. This is when he is most vulnerable. Whoever beats Jon Jones will put him on his back foot and track him down. I don't know if Reyes is the guy but he needs to be looking to get of first and often with combos and he needs to swing for the fences when the opportunity arises.
Click to expand...

I wonder if any of the elite, highly trained professional killers he's faced (some recent champions) figured that out yet-

"I only need to bang with him"

These fighters should just search sherdog for strategies
 
Dorkman said:
Probably. Skill wise, very very few stack up well with him. So he definitely needs to be shell shocked I think to get a victory over him. Someone who can breach his ability to range find and distance dictate, step inside with powerful hooks and shots down the middle inside of Jons effective range. It won't be as effective a strategy as it is in boxing against taller guys because jon has the option of just clinching up and going for grappling when his range gets breached. But it's really the only thing you can do cause if you stand out at range and try to pot shot jon will just front kick and oblique kick you into submission. Maybe someone can formulate a wrestling strat against him prioritizing top position cause we've never really seen jon have to spend any extended time on his back. But certainly a tall order with his grappling ability and leverage to get him down to the mat and controlled.
Click to expand...
A big guy who can grapple and has power is Jon's kryptonite but I don't see it LHW. I'd really like to see Stipe/Jones but he ain't going there
 
ermac88 said:
I wonder if any of the elite, highly trained professional killers he's faced (some recent champions) figured that out yet-

"I only need to bang with him"

These fighters should just search sherdog for strategies
Click to expand...
It's more about the mental attitude that it takes to beat jones. Of course that person is going to have to have the skill and physical attributes to pull it off too.
 
Bad Karate said:
He was cleared of any wrongdoing by the people that do the testing.

Y'all just wont accept any facts that don't fit your hate fueled narrative.
Click to expand...

Bad Karate said:
A proud hater if that ain't the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.

But USADA wasn't suspect when they found the picogram huh?

Now that they found Jones innocent you pathetic, loser, picopenis pussboys wanna try to change facts to fit your narrative.
Click to expand...

I don't think that's true. He was let off on plausible deniability. In the california state athletic commision hearing Dr. Eichner (USADA) did not state that he endorsed the pulsing narrative or that he thinks the amount ingested (not to be conflated with amount of metabolites found) didn't have an effect on performance. It seems that he did what any responsible scientists would do in this case and said something to the effect of "without more data we cannot make any solid conclusions".

Here's an excerpt from the California State Athletic Commission Hearing

M5spdMg.jpg


He was merely stating what "Dr. Scott" (who doesn't have a PhD in chemistry or biology) of Korvo labs (Jones expert witness) said in his report. Not that he endorsed the viewpoints of Paul Scott. Of course being the idiots or opportunists that the UFC, The Athletic Commissions, and MMA journalists are clung to "Dr. Eichner described in all likelihood, the athlete administered a contaminated product, which caused the adverse finding on the test done in late July" without mentioning the preceding or following sentences.


Full quote

"Mr. Ledakis directed the Commission’s attention to Dr. Paul Scott’s expert report (Exhibit Y) and asked Dr. Eichner if he has reviewed the report. Dr. Eichner responded he had. When asked to describe what the report generally stated, Dr. Eichner described in all likelihood, the athlete administered a contaminated product, which caused the adverse finding on the test done in late July. He added, however, there is not enough information available to determine whether it was therapeutic or a contaminant. He stated with the information available to him, it would be impossible to make a determination whether the adverse finding was purely caused from a contaminated product and is, therefore, unable to agree with Dr. Scott’s conclusion in his report. "

Here's the California State Athletic Commission report (I cannot find the Nevada State Athletic Commission report).

https://www.dca.ca.gov/csac/meetings/minutes/20180227.pdf


Edit: let me know if you find anything in a primary source that conflicts with my analysis.
 
Last edited:
SG123 said:
Don’t you mean ‘when I bang’? Gimp
Click to expand...
Well you are clearly a virgin. I'll inform you child that when you bang you cum at the end and it's over thus AFTER you bang. I see your av is your love life.
 
I think the guy to do it has to have beaucoup de power, a very respectable reach, and, very importantly, some unpredictability. It always seems like Jon is wise to every strike coming his way long before it gets to its target. Somebody needs to get him expecting one thing and then surprise him with something else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,239,099
Messages
55,604,745
Members
174,847
Latest member
MaleRousyStan

Share this page

Back
Top