- Joined
- Dec 18, 2002
- Messages
- 19,761
- Reaction score
- 4,984
Yoel Roth
lol
sounds like a shout from Skyrim.
Yoel Roth
lol
this is gonna open his fat ass up to getting sued for posting libelous nonsense all day on Twitter.
It's wunderbar entertainment, that's for sure.We're all living in Amerika
Amerika ist wunderbar
Watching this administration circle the toilet is satisfying, but November can't come fast enough to get this clown out of office.You're gonna need to keep working on that.
The whole thing is bananas. Trump is getting more and more extreme but he's still doing the exact same shit he did in 2016. Just trying to distract and divide people.
this is gonna open his fat ass up to getting sued for posting libelous nonsense all day on Twitter.
So, if he says some vile shit, or someone like Alex Jones does, will they be liable as well?
This will change nothing lmao
Crybaby Trump attempting to abuse his power as usual. Wahhhhhhhhh
So let me get this straight, when a liberal President inevitably comes, he can go after Fox News and Rush Limbaugh (bye bye Freedom Medal or whatever the fuk that participation trophy was) ?
Watching this administration circle the toilet is satisfying, but November can't come fast enough to get this clown out of office.
They're going to have to power wash the Lincoln bedroom to get the Burger King smell out.
If twitter becomes more liable for their content, you can bet your sweet ass that they will pay that liability forward to their users. You don't have to be able to think that far ahead to realize there is no way in holy hell that Twitter is going to take the brunt of this.To my knowledge, individual users are already liable for libel charges. For example, at least a few if not all of Trump's recent tweets about Joe Scarborough seem libelous to me. Being on twitter doesn't exempt Trump or any other user from such charges to my knowledge. It shouldn't.
However, since Twitter doesn't make an honest attempt to be a neutral platform, why should they be shielded from responsibility for the venom spewed forth on their site daily?
ThisI’m all for going after social media censorship but I’m not convinced this will be an effective approach. Seems like it would incentivize more censorship, not less.
So let me get this straight, when a liberal President inevitably comes, he can go after Fox News and Rush Limbaugh (bye bye Freedom Medal or whatever the fuk that participation trophy was) ?
Maybe this is worth it after all.
Again, this is really simple...this, in the end, would come down on users...not Twitter.I feel like you guys haven't actually read the EO. It doesn't impose liability on anyone, it clearly and simply defines those who act as publishers. Actual publishers aren't going to be subject to any more scrutiny or punishment than they were before.
I feel like you guys haven't actually read the EO. It doesn't impose liability on anyone, it clearly and simply defines those who act as publishers. Actual publishers aren't going to be subject to any more scrutiny or punishment than they were before.
They'll make a Conservative friendly social media platform and it will fail.
Burger King and McDonald's have very different smells. But yes, power washing is in order.Watching this administration circle the toilet is satisfying, but November can't come fast enough to get this clown out of office.
They're going to have to power wash the Lincoln bedroom to get the Burger King smell out.
Morbidly obese people who eat lots of fast food make terrible smells that go beyond farting.Nah, the powerwashing was needed after all the cum from the Clinton days. Trump's failures could be removed with a bowl of vinegar left overnight. I'm assuming Trump has farted on each and every wall in the complex at this point.
living the dreamDoes this mean I can spam I hate s on social media without getting banned? It’s a political opinion after all.