Opinion Explain the Great Reset to me

Hellowhosthat said:
But how are you linking that with the information provided?
Click to expand...

How not, honestly are you blind or willfully dumb?

How will the welfares trash ever be my equal unless you take away my assets ? that is the big idea in all the bs ain't it, pretending we are all equal.
 
Legicato said:
How not, honestly are you blind or willfully dumb?

How will the welfares trash ever be my equal unless you take away my assets ? that is the big idea in all the bs ain't it, pretending we are all equal.
Click to expand...

Not really based on the information that's there, no.
 
...The truth is, people, society, and governments all evolve over time, the Great Reset is simply a phrase that is being used to indicate the direction that things seem to be headed. ( more control, less freedom)
Just look around and judge for yourselves , how has the world changed over the last decade, and has that change accelerated?
The rulers who control the media clearly have an agenda, that agenda is The Great Reset..
 
Hellowhosthat said:
The Great Reset agenda would have three main components. The first would steer the market toward fairer outcomes. To this end, governments should improve coordination (for example, in tax, regulatory, and fiscal policy), upgrade trade arrangements, and create the conditions for a “stakeholder economy.” At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action.

Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.

The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability. Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ($826 billion) recovery fund. The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans.

Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.

The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges. During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centers; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.
Click to expand...
Yikes

Not sure how anyone could read this and not see the obvious red flags
 
Legicato said:
Yes it is, maybe read the article you posted lol.
Click to expand...

You're making assumptions. When they're talking equality if you watch any of the videos, they're talking about farmers in Rwanda, not someone who likes playing Warcraft and doesn't want a job in Detroit.
 
Hellowhosthat said:
You're making assumptions. When they're talking equality if you watch any of the videos, they're talking about farmers in Rwanda, not someone who likes playing Warcraft and doesn't want a job in Detroit.
Click to expand...

LMAo keep telling yourself that. Because they surely will achieve their commie agenda with out decimating the middle class.

How will the millions welfare leeches in North America achieve the fairy tale of equality without me getting severely taxed for the audacity of owning property and multiple vehicles ?
 
Legicato said:
LMAo keep telling yourself that. Because they surely will achieve their commie agenda with out decimating the middle class.

How will the millions welfare leeches in North America achieve the fairy tale of equality without me getting severely taxed for the audacity of owning property and multiple vehicles ?
Click to expand...

It's the World Economic Forum, the stated goals are worldwide, not just for the US and they have no power to implement any policy in America.

What have you actually read about their goals other than what you've read in this thread and where have you read it?
 
Hellowhosthat said:
It's the World Economic Forum, the stated goals are worldwide, not just for the US and they have no power to implement any policy in America.

What have you actually read about their goals other than what you've read in this thread and where have you read it?
Click to expand...

lmao, what cant reply to what I said. what what what
 
Legicato said:
lmao, what cant reply to what I said. what what what
Click to expand...

Like I said, I don't have a side when it comes to this debate. I'm just interested in what people actually know about the issue and am looking to further my understanding of it.

It seems you don't know very much about it, though.
 
Pretty sure its got something to do with taking our likes away.
 
Hellowhosthat said:
There's far more information on the link I posted than that, that's just a brief introductory video for a presentation.

EDIT - These are the stated goals

The Great Reset agenda would have three main components. The first would steer the market toward fairer outcomes. To this end, governments should improve coordination (for example, in tax, regulatory, and fiscal policy), upgrade trade arrangements, and create the conditions for a “stakeholder economy.” At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action.

Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.

The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability. Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ($826 billion) recovery fund. The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans.

Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.

The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges. During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centers; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.
Click to expand...
As far as the stated goals, it sounds pretty reasonable.

I thought the great reset was some NWO/George Soros/the great replacement CT. Obviously they have to throw communism in there too. All the hits.
 
Hellowhosthat said:
I don't see any issue with any of the goals stated there. I started the thread because I'm open minded as to what other information people can provide (as long as it's reasonably sourced).

I don't have a concrete opinion yet.
Click to expand...
They sound fine in vague statements, but as they say the devil is in the details.
 
Sano said:
As far as the stated goals, it sounds pretty reasonable.
Click to expand...

Even Communist ideas seemed reasonable early on, ever see how it turned out.

Nazis were quite reasonable to the average German weren't they ehh.
 
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/

"Welcome to the year 2030. Welcome to my city - or should I say, "our city". I don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any appliances or any clothes."

author says this is just an idea to be considered the future might be like, i dunno read this article and consider it

guranteed some people are going to own things, prob 100% of all things, as opposed to the ~60-70% they prob at now
 
Legicato said:
Even Communist ideas seemed reasonable early on, ever see how it turned out.

Nazis were quite reasonable to the average German weren't they ehh.
Click to expand...
Huh? What does the ideas have to do with communism? Or nazism?

Headkicktoleg said:
Everything being equal for everyone sounds reasonable when you don't give it any thought.
Click to expand...
Where did it say that everything should be equal for everyone?
 
Sano said:
Huh? What does the ideas have to do with communism? Or nazism?


Where did it say that everything should be equal for everyone?
Click to expand...
One thing I saw from the Great Reset and the WEF said that you will not own anything and you will be happy.

In communism, private property is replaced by public property, the state owns it, you don't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,629
Messages
55,506,275
Members
174,800
Latest member
kechan123

Share this page

Back
Top