International [U.S COVID Vaccine News] CDC to Lift COVID-19 Testing Requirement for international Travelers

COVID-19 vaccines hold strong against Delta, protection waning in older adults over 75
By Julie Steenhuysen | September 10, 2021

ASAZC3JCXRPIFPVR2YH36VZQQI.jpg

Three U.S. studies suggest COVID-19 vaccines offer strong protection against hospitalization and death, even in the face of the highly transmissible Delta variant, but vaccine protection appears to be waning among older populations, especially among those 75 and older.

U.S. data on hospitalization from nine states during the period when the Delta variant was dominant also suggests that the Moderna Inc vaccine (MRNA.O) was more effective at preventing hospitalizations among individuals of all ages than vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer Inc (PFE.N) or Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N).

In that study of more than 32,000 visits to urgent care centers, emergency rooms and hospitals, Moderna's vaccine was 95% effective at preventing hospitalization compared with 80% for Pfizer and 60% for J&J.

Overall, the findings, released on Friday in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's weekly report on death and disease show that vaccines continue to offer strong protection from COVID-19.

https://www.reuters.com/business/he...ta-protection-waning-older-adults-2021-09-10/
 
The CDC says vaccine protection is waning for older Americans, though they still work very well for younger people
By Hilary Brueck | Sep 10, 2021​

US health officials are releasing new data that suggests older adults should start lining up for booster shots in just a matter of weeks.

On Friday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shared two new data sets showing that the immunity people over age 65 got from their initial COVID-19 vaccines is possibly starting to wane.

The drop offs are most stark in people aged 75 and up, who, according to one CDC report, are increasingly at risk of hospitalization or death from COVID-19, even when fully vaccinated.

Taken together, the reports suggest that the vaccines are still doing very well at their primary job of keeping people under the age of 65 alive and out of the hospital — but for older people vaccine protection is not as strong.

The reports provide an argument for offering boosters to older Americans soon. They also suggest that, although more than 80% of adults over 65 are already fully vaccinated, that may not be enough to protect them from severe disease.

The first report tracked 1,175 veterans hospitalized at five different VA medical centers across the country, taking into account their age and vaccination status.

The study only included veterans who'd been fully vaccinated with two shots of Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, excluding anyone who mixed brands, or who got Johnson & Johnson's vaccine.

Almost all of these study participants (93%) were men (most veterans are), but the veterans were also "older, more racially diverse," and had higher prevalence of underlying medical conditions than the general US population, CDC study authors wrote. This makes veterans an important group to study, as they may be some of the most vulnerable vaccinated patients.

Encouragingly, the study found that even among veterans, vaccine protection against hospitalization remained high (at 95%) for those fully vaccinated under age 65 — even with the Delta variant dominating over the summer, causing some mild infections in the vaccinated.

In veterans over age 65, however, vaccine protection against hospitalization was much lower (around 80%), suggesting older adults are not as well protected from infection as others with two shots on board.

The second study measured how well all three US-authorized vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J) protect people from being hospitalized with COVID-19, taking a look at more than 32,000 hospital and ER visits across nine US states over the summer.

The data from that study suggests that the vaccines are about 86% effective against hospitalization overall, but that figure drops to 76% among adults who are 75 or older.

When people over 75 years old were left out of the equation, vaccines were nearly 90% effective at preventing hospitalization.

These kind of vaccine efficacy drops in older adults had not been seen as much in earlier studies, conducted before Delta took over.

It's tough to know for sure what's driving the decline. It could be that vaccine immunity is waning for older adults, who were vaccinated earlier during the initial rollout. But it's also possible that the Delta variant is making vaccine efficacy lower in this group. The decline could be due to "a combination of factors," the CDC report authors said.

"It actually may be very difficult for us to disentangle time since vaccination and the impact of the Delta variant, especially in some populations that we know were vaccinated earlier," the CDC's Sarah Oliver said during a meeting of independent vaccine advisors, on August 30.

https://www.businessinsider.com/cdc-booster-shots-for-people-over-65-are-needed-now-2021-9
 
Last edited:
The CDC says vaccine protection is waning for older Americans, though they still work very well for younger people
By Hilary Brueck | Sep 10, 2021​

US health officials are releasing new data that suggests older adults should start lining up for booster shots in just a matter of weeks.

On Friday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shared two new data sets showing that the immunity people over age 65 got from their initial COVID-19 vaccines is possibly starting to wane.

The drop offs are most stark in people aged 75 and up, who, according to one CDC report, are increasingly at risk of hospitalization or death from COVID-19, even when fully vaccinated.

Taken together, the reports suggest that the vaccines are still doing very well at their primary job of keeping people under the age of 65 alive and out of the hospital — but for older people vaccine protection is not as strong.

The reports provide an argument for offering boosters to older Americans soon. They also suggest that, although more than 80% of adults over 65 are already fully vaccinated, that may not be enough to protect them from severe disease.

The first report tracked 1,175 veterans hospitalized at five different VA medical centers across the country, taking into account their age and vaccination status.

The study only included veterans who'd been fully vaccinated with two shots of Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, excluding anyone who mixed brands, or who got Johnson & Johnson's vaccine.

Almost all of these study participants (93%) were men (most veterans are), but the veterans were also "older, more racially diverse," and had higher prevalence of underlying medical conditions than the general US population, CDC study authors wrote. This makes veterans an important group to study, as they may be some of the most vulnerable vaccinated patients.

Encouragingly, the study found that even among veterans, vaccine protection against hospitalization remained high (at 95%) for those fully vaccinated under age 65 — even with the Delta variant dominating over the summer, causing some mild infections in the vaccinated.

In veterans over age 65, however, vaccine protection against hospitalization was much lower (around 80%), suggesting older adults are not as well protected from infection as others with two shots on board.

The second study measured how well all three US-authorized vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J) protect people from being hospitalized with COVID-19, taking a look at more than 32,000 hospital and ER visits across nine US states over the summer.

The data from that study suggests that the vaccines are about 86% effective against hospitalization overall, but that figure drops to 76% among adults who are 75 or older.

When people over 75 years old were left out of the equation, vaccines were nearly 90% effective at preventing hospitalization.

These kind of vaccine efficacy drops in older adults had not been seen as much in earlier studies, conducted before Delta took over.

It's tough to know for sure what's driving the decline. It could be that vaccine immunity is waning for older adults, who were vaccinated earlier during the initial rollout. But it's also possible that the Delta variant is making vaccine efficacy lower in this group. The decline could be due to "a combination of factors," the CDC report authors said.

"It actually may be very difficult for us to disentangle time since vaccination and the impact of the Delta variant, especially in some populations that we know were vaccinated earlier," the CDC's Sarah Oliver said during a meeting of independent vaccine advisors, on August 30.

https://www.businessinsider.com/cdc-booster-shots-for-people-over-65-are-needed-now-2021-9
I saw the headline for the data published by Moderna itself. It's perfectly consistent with the previous separate study from independent researchers I've quoted in this thread, and mentioned here. As Moderna noted, the vaccine offered half the protection after five months, and the prior study noted a 22% decline per month.
The VE has ranged from as low as 39% in other countries to as high as 89% in our own during the Delta dominant period. The most comprehensive figure in the USA I posted in here recently was 79% (but that VE diminishes 22% with each month since the vaccine).

Ivermectin, meanwhile, requires 2 doses spaces 48-72 hours apart, and only maintained effectiveness in reducing the spread of the disease for a month after that dosage. That's in the studies like those in India or Argentina that showed a positive benefit at all.

Yet for some reason people are obsessed with Ivermectin. It makes no sense. The truth is if the government prescribed Ivermectin to every American, requiring that drug for work rights in public spaces, suddenly, every American anti-vaxxer would become anti-Ivermectin overnight.

This reluctance is not founded on education or reason. That's why the incredibly low rate of side effects of the vaccine, for example, most notably in comparison to the disease itself, are ignored.
 
I saw the headline for the data published by Moderna itself. It's perfectly consistent with the previous separate study from independent researchers I've quoted in this thread, and mentioned here. As Moderna noted, the vaccine offered half the protection after five months, and the prior study noted a 22% decline per month.
So after say 9 months are vaccinated people as defenceless as unvaccinated?

I've noticed this tall about Pfizer and moderna but haven't seen much about astra declining and I think one of the creators of astra said a booster shot may be needed once in your life time if at all.
 
So after say 9 months are vaccinated people as defenceless as unvaccinated?

I've noticed this tall about Pfizer and moderna but haven't seen much about astra declining and I think one of the creators of astra said a booster shot may be needed once in your life time if at all.
No, assuming that decline in deterioration holds, it would take 21 months for the vaccine to drop to the resilience of the unvaccinated, and only for the Delta variant (since vaccines are more effective against previous variants).

*Edit*
Oh, it just occurs to me that's wrong. The problem is the 4.6x less likely to contract COVID for the vaccinated during the delta-dominant phase was sampled many months after most received their first vaccine (with varying time differences for each patient). Previous studies, done closer to the first vaccination window, particularly those focused on the previous dominant variants, showed the vaccinated to be 11x or more resilient against contracting the disease.

So, in fact, the vaccinated will enjoy protection for probably 3+ years. It would take a lot of work to offer a more accurate estimate.
 
Last edited:
CDC study finds Moderna vaccine most effective against hospitalization
Moderna's vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization was 93%, while the Pfizer-BioNTech and Johnson & Johnson vaccines was 88% and 71% respectively
By Justine Coleman | September 17, 2021​

A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study released Friday found the Moderna vaccine to be the most effective against COVID-19 hospitalization, although all three vaccines provided "substantial protection."

Researchers calculated Moderna's vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization was 93 percent, while the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Johnson & Johnson vaccines was 88 percent and 71 percent, respectively.

"Although these real-world data suggest some variation in levels of protection by vaccine, all FDA-approved or authorized COVID-19 vaccines provide substantial protection against COVID-19 hospitalization," the report said.

The study involved more than 3,600 adults who were hospitalized at 21 U.S. hospitals across 18 states between March 11 and Aug. 15. Out of those, 1,682 received positive COVID-19 test results, while the others were considered controls. Immunocompromised adults were not included in the research.

Most of the participants - 64 percent - were unvaccinated. Almost 13 percent were fully vaccinated with the Moderna vaccine, 20 percent were fully vaccinated with the Pfizer shot and 3.1 percent were fully vaccinated with the Johnson & Johnson dose.

Vaccine effectiveness among Moderna recipients hit 93 percent between 14 to 120 days after the second dose and dropped slightly to 92 percent after about four months.

But researchers documented a larger decline in effectiveness among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients, which contributed to the lower overall vaccine effectiveness. The Pfizer shots were considered 91 percent effective between 14 to 120 days after the second shot and just 77 percent after 120 days.

The scientists said the apparent higher effectiveness of the Moderna regimen after about four months could be because of higher mRNA content in the Moderna vaccine or the difference between the timing between doses. Recipients of Moderna get their second dose after four weeks, while Pfizer-BioNTech recipients get theirs after three weeks.

The study also analyzed antibody levels in 100 healthy volunteers at three hospitals two to six weeks after vaccination and found anti-RBD antibody levels higher in the Moderna vaccine than the other two products. The measure of IgG antibodies was similar in Moderna and Pfizer vaccine recipients, which were higher than Johnson & Johnson recipients.

The CDC wrote that the data suggests both mRNA vaccines, Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech, "provide more protection" than the Johnson & Johnson shot. Figuring out the effectiveness could potentially effect policy recommendations on booster shots, the agency noted.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthca...a-vaccine-most-effective-against-covid-19?amp
 
Last edited:
As expected, the FDA's scientific advisers only recommend boosters for those who actually needs it, as data clearly shows protection is waning for their demographic, rather than the general population whose protection remains strong.

Sorry Pfizer executives, no easy billions of dollars worth of third shots in wealthy countries for you! Not when much of the world are still waiting for their first dose.
---

FDA advisers vote to only recommend Pfizer booster shots for those over 65 and at high risks



Scientific advisers to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have voted not to recommend a third shot of the Pfizer vaccine for most Americans, a potentially significant blow to the Biden administration after it announced a plan to “boost” adults before advisory committees had a chance to review scientific evidence in public.

The committee chair, Dr Arnold Monto, a University of Michigan epidemiologist, continued deliberations after the vote. Sixteen of 18 advisers opposed the broad proposal for boosters for those older than 16, even as some members believed there is “a role” for a third dose.

After the initial “no” vote, the committee recommended a much smaller number of Americans receive third shots of the Pfizer vaccine at least six months after their first doses, this time under emergency use authorization rather than full approval.

The 18-member panel unanimously recommended a “booster” dose to people older than 65 and at high risk of severe Covid-19. As a result of the emergency use authorization, study will probably continue on booster shots as Pfizer works to achieve full approval.

The advisory panel then further clarified the emergency use authorization should include health workers and those at high risk of “occupational” exposure to Covid-19.

The decision by the FDA’s vaccines and related biological products advisory committee is not binding, but the FDA usually follows its advice.

The decision came after significant public scientific dissent regarding a third dose. Much of the data in favor came from Israel, while data was sparse on whether a booster could help protect people against hospitalization and death.

“There are too many questions for me to feel comfortable saying ‘yes’ to this,” said A Oveta Fuller, a member and associate professor of microbiology and immunology at the Medical School University of Michigan, summing up the views of several voting members.

Another committee member, Dr Eric Rubin, a Harvard assistant professor of microbiology and molecular genetics, said he “strongly” suspects the vaccine will be low-risk, “but we don’t have that right now, and I don’t think I’d be comfortable giving it to a 16-year-old for all the reasons everyone has raised”.

In its application for approval, Pfizer submitted safety data on only about 300 adults aged 18 to 55 who received a booster shot, a sample size several members said was too small.

The decision throws into question the Biden administration’s plan to provide a third Pfizer shot to fully vaccinated Americans older than 16. It also throws into question broader booster plans, which the administration had made sound nearly inevitable.

Another Covid-19 vaccine maker, Moderna, has applied to provide booster shots. Administration officials have not recommended booster shots for people who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, though they still may.

All vaccines currently available in the US are highly effective against hospitalization and death from Covid-19. FDA committee members’ questions about “waning” vaccine immunity tended to focus on how effective vaccines remained against preventing infection, transmission and prevention of mild to moderate disease, and whether that would significantly change the direction of the pandemic.

Scientists said they had “trouble” supporting the Pfizer application for booster doses for most Americans for reasons including the risk of myocarditis, or heart inflammation, in young men especially; a lack of evidence that boosters would significantly curb the direction of the pandemic; and questions about whether boosters should be confined to older Americans.

Much of the debate focused on how vaccines provoked immunity: did waning immunity in mild and moderate disease, which requires circulating antibodies, indicate there would be waning immunity from severe disease requiring hospitalization, which relies on a different part of the immune system? Several members felt there was insufficient evidence to answer the question.

However, not all voting members agreed.

“Immunity clearly seems to decrease over time,” said Dr Jay Portnoy of Children’s Mercy hospital in Kansas City, a committee member who said he was already prescribing a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

“Do we want to wait until more previously vaccinated people get sick before we prevent them from getting sick,” Portnoy said. “I’d rather not get the Covid disease.”

There was agreement on the question of waning immunity in older people, who also face the highest risks of severe Covid-19.

The administration’s booster plan for the general public has been criticized by scientists and global health leaders. Dissent intensified as the FDA’s meeting neared, culminating with two scientists leaving the organization over the booster plan.

In an article published in the Lancet, the departed scientists warned: “Current evidence does not appear to show a need for boosting in the general population, in which efficacy against severe disease remains high.”

The benefits of boosting, they said, “will not outweigh the benefits of providing initial protection to the unvaccinated”.

The most potent criticism has argued that providing booster shots to people in wealthy, western nations is not nearly as effective as vaccinating new people around the world, and that providing booster shots necessarily reduces vaccine supply in poorer countries. The FDA excluded this debate from its deliberations.

Regardless of the FDA, some healthy Americans have felt compelled to seek third shots. The US plan for booster shots may have influenced other wealthy nations to roll out booster programs, further reducing available vaccine supply.

There is little debate that third shots are appropriate for people who are immunocompromised and mount a less robust response to the vaccine. The FDA recommended third shots for this group in August.

https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/17/fda-pfizer-booster-shots-covid-vaccine-advisers
 
Last edited:
Novavax Vaccine getting ready to apply for full approval
By Joeli Poole | September 7, 2021​



The Novavax Covid vaccine has undergone months of clinical trials against not only the original coronavirus strain but also the new variants.

The Maryland based biotech company says it’s 2 dose vaccine is around 90 percent effective and is safe – after being tested on nearly 30 thousand trial participants.

“Where we are currently as investigators reviewing data with the sponsor. The FDA is looking at safety data and following up with patients who were vaccinated early this year to see if any of them have breakthrough cases and then trying to give efficacy results to the public so we can have another option out there for Covid,” says Dr. Mark McKenzie, Regional Medical Director for ClinSearch.

Recently The CDC announced that participants in the Novavax PREVENT-19 Phase 3 clinical trial are considered fully vaccinated two weeks after they have completed the vaccine series.

Chattanooga resident Brooke Marsh was one of these participants.

“I was really glad to hear that they considered it fully vaccinated. It’s a more traditional vaccine. I have had nothing but good experiences from it. I didn’t have any side effects from either set of shots. I think they are very trustworthy,” says Marsh.

The company says they plan to seek full authorization to distribute the vaccine within the next few months- with the focus being on low to middle income countries.

“It’s a different type of vaccine though. Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA vaccines. This one is a protein subunit vaccine. It’s a type of vaccine that we have used for flu, hepatitis, and HPV in the past. But this one is targeting the world. It will be available to people around the world in addition to what’s out there. Hopefully it will be at a lower cost for some countries that don’t have the resources like the United States has,” says Dr. McKenzie.

Dr. Mark McKenzie is hoping that with this fourth vaccine being a more familiar type of vaccine – those who have felt uneasy, will finally feel comfortable with getting vaccinated.

On Tuesday, Japan secured 150 million doses of the Novavax vaccine.

https://www.wdef.com/novavax-vaccine-getting-ready-to-apply-for-full-approval/


I might get this one next year if good studies come out on it.
 
I might get this one next year if good studies come out on it.

The ball is in Novavax's court. They're supposed to send their trials data in to the FDA for analysis months ago but delayed it multiple times already. Hopefully there wouldn't be any more set-backs, or else we might not even see it being deployed here in the U.S. and probably just deployed in other mid-income countries.

Tens of thousands of Novavax's trial participants in the U.S, U.K, E.U, and Australia have been stuck in limbo for months now while waiting for the company to submit their approval request to the FDA:

Novavax COVID vaccine trial participants left battling a tough decision after FDA submission delayed
www.wral.com/coronavirus/novavax-trial-participants-left-battling-a-tough-decision/19878523/

Australian Novavax trial participants remain unrecognised by vaccine register
https://amp.theguardian.com/austral...pants-remain-unrecognised-by-vaccine-register

There's now a political row brewing between the U.K and the E.U because of that:

Ministers told to bar EU from UK trial data in Novavax vaccines row
https://amp.theguardian.com/society...-row-england-deputy-chief-medical-guinea-pigs

They seems to have no shortage of pre-ordering customers though, as there are still many countries who had just barely begun their immunization drive after being walloped by Delta, so at least there is money in the bank for them to plan their international manufacturing and distribution.
 
Last edited:
Moderna, Novavax developing combined COVID-19 and Flu shots
By Reuters | September 09, 2021​

virus-outbreak.jpg

Moderna Inc. said on Thursday it was developing a single-dose vaccine that combines a booster dose against COVID-19 and a booster against flu.

"Our number-one priority as a company right now is to bring to market a pan-respiratory annual booster vaccine, which we plan to always customize and upgrade," chief executive officer Stéphane Bancel said.

The company said the benefits of a pan-respiratory vaccine would be immense, pointing to Centers for Disease Control data that indicates there were over 400,000 hospitalizations due to influenza in the U.S. in the last pre-pandemic year, with the seasonal flu representing an average economic burden of $11 billion US annually.

The drugmaker already had several influenza vaccine candidates in development. The new vaccine combines the experimental flu shot that is furthest along with its COVID-19 vaccine.

Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine received its emergency authorization for people aged 18 and older in Canada and the United States in December 2020. The vaccine was approved by Health Canada for those 12 to 17 in late August, and the company is in an ongoing mid-stage trial testing its authorized COVID-19 vaccine in children aged six months to less than 12 years.

The Massachusetts-based drugmaker signed a memorandum of understanding with the federal government in Ottawa in early August to build an mRNA vaccine manufacturing plant in Canada.

Novavax Inc. said on Wednesday it had initiated an early stage study to test its combined flu and COVID-19 vaccine.

Its trial, to be conducted in Australia, will enrol 640 healthy adults between the ages of 50 and 70 and who have either been previously infected with the coronavirus or given an authorized COVID-19 vaccine at least eight weeks prior to the study.

Participants will receive a combination of the company's COVID-19 vaccine candidate, NVX-CoV2373, and its influenza shot NanoFlu, along with an adjuvant or vaccine booster.

"Combination of these two vaccines … may lead to greater efficiencies for the health-care system and achieve high levels of protection against COVID-19 and influenza with a single regimen," Gregory Glenn, president of research and development at Novavax, said in a statement.

Novavax trial results expected in first half of 2022

Novavax had said in May it expects seasonal influenza and COVID-19 combination vaccines to likely be critical in combating emerging COVID-19 variants. Its vaccine NanoFlu/NVX-CoV2373 had elicited robust responses to both influenza A and B and protected against the coronavirus in pre-clinical studies.

The company, based in Maryland, expects the trial results in the first half of 2022.

Novavax has yet to file for emergency use authorization of its two-dose COVID-19 vaccine in North America or Europe.

The company signed a deal with the European Union this month to supply up to 200 million doses of its COVID-19 vaccine. Novavax said in its most recent earnings announcement that it planned to submit its data to the EU "within weeks" of its filing to British regulators, setting the likely timeline between late September and early October, a spokesperson said.

https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6169305
 
Last edited:
Novavax Vaccine getting ready to apply for full approval
By Joeli Poole | September 7, 2021​



The Novavax Covid vaccine has undergone months of clinical trials against not only the original coronavirus strain but also the new variants.

The Maryland based biotech company says it’s 2 dose vaccine is around 90 percent effective and is safe – after being tested on nearly 30 thousand trial participants.

“Where we are currently as investigators reviewing data with the sponsor. The FDA is looking at safety data and following up with patients who were vaccinated early this year to see if any of them have breakthrough cases and then trying to give efficacy results to the public so we can have another option out there for Covid,” says Dr. Mark McKenzie, Regional Medical Director for ClinSearch.

Recently The CDC announced that participants in the Novavax PREVENT-19 Phase 3 clinical trial are considered fully vaccinated two weeks after they have completed the vaccine series.

Chattanooga resident Brooke Marsh was one of these participants.

“I was really glad to hear that they considered it fully vaccinated. It’s a more traditional vaccine. I have had nothing but good experiences from it. I didn’t have any side effects from either set of shots. I think they are very trustworthy,” says Marsh.

The company says they plan to seek full authorization to distribute the vaccine within the next few months- with the focus being on low to middle income countries.

“It’s a different type of vaccine though. Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA vaccines. This one is a protein subunit vaccine. It’s a type of vaccine that we have used for flu, hepatitis, and HPV in the past. But this one is targeting the world. It will be available to people around the world in addition to what’s out there. Hopefully it will be at a lower cost for some countries that don’t have the resources like the United States has,” says Dr. McKenzie.

Dr. Mark McKenzie is hoping that with this fourth vaccine being a more familiar type of vaccine – those who have felt uneasy, will finally feel comfortable with getting vaccinated.

On Tuesday, Japan secured 150 million doses of the Novavax vaccine.

https://www.wdef.com/novavax-vaccine-getting-ready-to-apply-for-full-approval/

Wonder if this one will be broader than the mRNA vaccines? As they seem to have less proteins for the body to react to. Which seems to be the cause for the quick decrease in immunity erosion
 


A two-dose version of Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine provides 94% protection against symptomatic infection, the company said Tuesday — making a two-dose regimen of J&J’s Janssen vaccine comparable to a two-dose regimen of Moderna’s or Pfizer’s.

Plus, the company said, adding a booster dose to a single shot of the vaccine raised immunity even more, and should also protect people strongly against infection.

The company released some details of three studies looking at various aspects of its Janssen vaccine, and said that, taken together, they showed the vaccine provided long-lasting protection that could be boosted with an extra shot.

“Our large real-world-evidence and Phase 3 studies confirm that the single-shot Johnson & Johnson vaccine provides strong and long-lasting protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations,” Dr. Mathai Mammen, global head of Janssen Research & Development, said in a statement.

“Our single-shot vaccine generates strong immune responses and long-lasting immune memory. And, when a booster of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine is given, the strength of protection against COVID-19 further increases.”

Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose vaccine was given emergency use authorization by the US Food and Drug Administration on February 27. It has been given to about 14.8 million Americans, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The company’s ongoing Phase 2 trial of a two-dose regimen showed giving two doses 56 days apart provided 100% protection against severe Covid-19 and 94% protection against moderate to severe Covid-19 in the United States. Globally, the two-dose regimen provided 75% protection against moderate-to-severe Covid-19, the company said.

A second study showed people given a booster shot six months or longer after their first dose had a 12-fold increase in antibodies — compared to a four-fold increase for people who got a second dose at two months. So protection should be stronger if people get boosters later, Dr. Dan Barouch, head of Beth Israel Deaconess’ Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, told CNN.

“If you wait longer and have boost at six months or later then you likely will have better boost,” said Barouch.

Third, the company said a real-world evidence study of 390,000 people in the US, using health insurance records through July — so covering the Delta variant — showed the one-shot J&J vaccine was 81% effective at preventing hospitalizations.

“The Johnson & Johnson single-shot COVID-19 vaccine showed vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-related hospitalizations at 86% for participants younger than 60 years, and 78% for those 60 years and older,” the company said.

“Among 390,517 vaccinated and 1,524,153 matched unvaccinated individuals, vaccine effectiveness 79% for COVID-19 and 81% for COVID-19-related hospitalizations,” the Janssen-led research team wrote in a study posted online in a preprint.

“In high-Delta-incidence states, rates of observed COVID-19 were higher in both groups than in the national cohort,” they added.

“In these states, vaccine effectiveness for observed COVID-19 was 79% overall and 78% during June and July, the months where Delta variant incidence was highest,” they added.

Barouch, who has worked with Janssen to test the vaccine but who was not directly involved in the three studies, said people who got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine should be reassured by the data.

“All the vaccines in the US have shown robust and durable protection against severe disease and hospitalization,” he said.

“Ultimately, the job of a vaccine is to keep you from being sick and keep you from going into the hospital and to keep you alive, and all of the vaccines are doing that.”

Data on the J&J vaccine has come later than data about the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines because J&J’s was authorized around two months later. Johnson & Johnson has said it will submit all of this data to the FDA for potential consideration for adding a booster dose, and perhaps for consideration to authorize a two-dose regimen.

The Janssen vaccine is made using a different technology from Moderna’s and Pfizer’s vaccines. They deliver messenger RNA or mRNA directly to the body wrapped in compounds called lipids. The J&J vaccine is made using an adenovirus, a common cold virus, that’s been engineered so it can get into cells, but then stops. It delivers genetic instructions that way.

Barouch said there is room for a variety of approaches.

“A single shot gives robust and durable protection over a substantial period of time of time with minimal evidence of decline,” Barouch said.

“I think the single dose vaccine is a reasonable option for people and for countries that want a simple and convenient vaccine that can be administered quickly,” he added.

“For outstanding protection, then a second shot can be given at any time between two months and eight months — and the longer you wait, the better.”

That, he said, is because the body mounts a variety of immune responses. Antibodies — immune system proteins that can either flag an invader or directly attack and neutralize it — build up quickly but can wane over time.

The body also produces cells called B cells and T cells, and these contribute to longer-term protection. Stimulating B cells with a boost after time — after they have become less active — appears to cause them to generate fresh antibodies more effectively, he said.

Barouch said the J&J vaccine may appear less effective in countries outside the United States because it was tested in many countries when variants were circulating that can evade the protection offered by vaccines.

The Beta or B.1.351 variant is an example — it has so-called escape mutations that help it hide from the immune response. It circulated widely in South Africa but has been outcompeted in the US by Delta, which does not appear to escape immune protection as well.

https://www.ocregister.com/2021/09/...ne-94-effective-against-covid-19-study-finds/
 
California Now Has The Lowest Coronavirus Transmission Rate
in the U.S.

Sep 20, 2021



LOS ANGELES (AP) — California has the lowest coronavirus transmission rate of any state following a sharp decline in cases and hospitalizations after a summer surge.

The nation's most populous state is the only one experiencing “substantial" coronavirus transmission, the second-highest level on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's color-coded map. In all other U.S. states, virus transmission is labeled as “high," defined as 100 or more cases per 100,000 people in the last week.

California's rate is 94 cases per 100,000. By comparison, Texas is 386 and Florida is 296.

State health experts say relatively high vaccination rates in California ahead of the arrival of the delta variant made a difference, and additional measures, such as masking, also helped stem the surge. Nearly 70% of eligible Californians are fully vaccinated, and another 8% have received their first shot, state data shows.

“The overall secret to California has been the vaccination rates were high enough that we started off in an OK place," said Dr. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, a professor of epidemiology at University of California, San Francisco's medical school. “We just never reached the height we saw in Florida, for example, because it's against the backdrop of fairly high vaccination rates.”

On Monday, a state mandate went into effect requiring attendees at indoor events with 1,000 or more people show proof of full vaccination or a negative test. Patrons previously were allowed to just attest they were vaccinated or had a negative test.

Los Angeles County, which is home to one in four of the state's residents and has some of the state's strictest virus mandates, reported a 1.2% positivity rate on Monday.

Barbara Ferrer, LA County's director of public health, said safety measures that encourage masks and limit places where large numbers of unvaccinated people gather are needed to head off “a continual cycle of surges fueled by new variants of concern.”

In neighboring Orange County, which has looser restrictions than LA, coronavirus cases, positivity rates and hospitalizations also have declined in recent weeks, said Dr. Regina Chinsio-Kwong, the county’s deputy health director. She said she believes vaccinations made a difference, noting the recent surge was initially detected in the county's coastal areas and other places with lower vaccination rates.

“In terms of case rates and hospitalizations, everything is downward trending,” she said, adding the county's positivity rate has fallen to 3.7% from 6.8% in late August. “We are starting to get out of this surge, which is good.”

www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2021-09-21/california-now-has-nations-lowest-virus-transmission-rate?context=amp
 
Last edited:
Seems like the surge is going down here in Texas as well.
 
FDA authorizes Pfizer booster for people over 65 and at high risk
By Maggie Fox | September 22, 2021



The US Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it would grant emergency use authorization for a booster dose of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine in people 65 and older, people at high risk of severe disease and people whose jobs put them at risk of infection.

"After considering the totality of the available scientific evidence and the deliberations of our advisory committee of independent, external experts, the FDA amended the EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to allow for a booster dose in certain populations such as health care workers, teachers and day care staff, grocery workers and those in homeless shelters or prisons, among others," acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock said in a statement.

On Friday, vaccine advisers to the agency unanimously recommended emergency use authorization for a booster dose of Pfizer's vaccine for people 65 and older and those at risk of severe disease, to be six months after they get the first two doses.

"The FDA considered the committee's input and conducted its own thorough review of the submitted data to reach today's decision," Dr. Peter Marks, who directs the FDA's vaccine arm, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a statement.

"We will continue to analyze data submitted to the FDA pertaining to the use of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines and we will make further decisions as appropriate based on the data."

It was a consolation prize for Pfizer, which has asked for FDA approval to give its vaccine to everyone 16 and older six months after they are fully immunized with two shots. Pfizer had argued that it had enough evidence that immunity starts to wane after six months and that giving a booster restores the immunity safely.

Vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been discussing boosters, and will meet Thursday to act on the FDA's decision. The CDC must give its stamp of approval for any booster doses to be officially given.

CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices can further tweak recommendations for how any vaccine booster doses should be given.

In a letter sent Thursday and obtained by CNN, the CDC urged local and state health officials to wait to administer boosters until both agencies had signed off.

Third doses are already approved for certain immunocompromised people, but not for the general public. About 2.3 million Americans have already received third doses of Pfizer's vaccine, according to the CDC.

Moderna has asked the FDA to approve booster shots for its vaccine, but the FDA so far has only considered Pfizer's bid. Johnson & Johnson released partial data this week that it said showed a booster dose greatly raised immunity, but the company has not yet applied with the FDA to consider a booster vaccine dose.

The FDA's Dr. Doran Fink told ACIP Wednesday that there is no data on the safety or efficacy of mixing and matching vaccines - boosting with a dose of a brand of vaccine that is different from that used for the original immunization.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/09/22/health/fda-authorizes-covid-booster-bn/index.html
 
Last edited:
Looks like most people who got both Moderna doses don't need boosters this year either. Sorry greedy execs, no easy billions in unnecessary third shots for you!

Moderna’s vaccine efficacy held strong, did not wane after 5 months, new study shows
By Alexi Cohan | September 23, 2021



Coronavirus protection offered by Moderna’s mRNA vaccine held strong and did not wane for more than five months after the second shot, a new study out of Brigham and Women’s Hospital shows.

In a study of more than 30,000 participants, the vaccine remained safe and effective for an average of 5.3 months after their second shot. Even after the time had passed, the shot was 93.2% effective in preventing illness from COVID-19, and 98.2% effective in preventing severe disease.

Strong protection remained in all subgroups including elderly participants and those with comorbidities. Researchers also found there was protection against asymptomatic coronavirus.

Dr. Lindsey Baden, infectious disease specialist at BWH and co-corresponding author of the research published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine said, “Overall, our results continue to demonstrate that vaccines work and work extremely well at preventing COVID-19.”

Baden said, “We are continuing to explore questions about duration of immunity following vaccination and the impact of variants. But even as we examine the possibility of waning immunity, we see evidence that the vaccine is still very protective.”

https://www.ocregister.com/2021/09/...-did-not-wane-after-5-months-new-study-shows/
-----

Hey anti-vaxxers, especially those in southern states, can you guys please stop unnecessarily prolonging this pandemic now, rather than allowing it to continue thriving and keeps the ICUs packed for no good reason whatsoever? Other sick people with unavoidable illnesses need those hospital beds too ya know!
 
Last edited:
Hey anti-vaxxers, especially those in southern states, can you guys please stop unnecessarily prolonging this pandemic now, rather than allowing it to continue thriving and keeps the ICUs packed for no good reason whatsoever? Other sick people with unavoidable illnesses need those hospital beds too ya know!
Hey big pharma bootlickers in here, can you please stop trying to tell people what to do and mind your own fucking business? People don't want your soy nose in their business ya know.
 
Back
Top