Crime Ohio social worker had sex with 13-year-old client, tried to intimidate their family with a gun.

[Sara]

You already come off as mentally unstable but you have to be completely disconnected from reality if you think a younger tween wouldn't brag to all his friends after smashing an older woman.

Like I question your experience, if any, with that world view.

I don’t I think if the child knew it was wrong, they’d hide it. It’s like when you disobey your parents you don’t just confess.[/QUOTE]

 

[Sinister]

You already come off as mentally unstable but you have to be completely disconnected from reality if you think a younger tween wouldn't brag to all his friends after smashing an older woman.

Like I question your experience, if any, with that world view.

I'll take that as a compliment from someone who thinks grown women having sex with underaged boys is in any way admirable.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

They'd brag about it however if they didn't want to go through with it or they regretted it they probably wouldn't tell anyone that either.

So what? Even as an adult you wouldn't want to admit to certain people.

If we can't agree that a younger boy would be bragging to his friends then we are clearly dealing with some delusional people in this thread right about now.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

I'll take that as a compliment from someone who thinks grown women having sex with underaged boys is in any way admirable.

I never said that you dunce cap. Nice strawman.

 

[Hellowhosthat]

So what? Even as an adult you wouldn't want to admit to certain people.

If we can't agree that a younger boy would be bragging to his friends then we are clearly dealing with some delusional people in this thread right about now.

I'm not disagreeing with that but the issue is that if it does impact the young boy negatively then based on this thread there aren't many people who are going to want to hear that.

 

[Sinister]

They'd brag about it however if they didn't want to go through with it or they regretted it they probably wouldn't tell anyone that either.

Nothing I said implied they wouldn't brag about it, just...for the record.

 

[WklySportsMemes]

Come on dude, don’t throw rocks if you make statements like this.

I don't think he was talking about the weird fetish or fantasy some dudes have about girls who are raped that wind up enjoying it during the act....

He's probably talking about the pedophiles who engage in a relationship with minors where both parties believe they are consenting. Which is still rape.

 

[Sinister]

I never said that you dunce cap. Nice strawman.

 

[Source]

Yea, I get it, but this situation just doesn't invoke the thoughts or imagery that are typically associated with the word "abuse". Quite the opposite really.

It did say she was charged with sexual misconduct which sounds reasonable enough.

Out of curiosity, seeing as in how you make the distinction that she was in a position of power and advocacy being a qualifier for abuse, what would your stance be if it was just a random woman on the street encountering a boy the same age. To you, in what way would that differ, if it all?

Your response tells me that you without a doubt you don’t “get it”. Your feelings on what feels like abuse is irrelevant.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Concession accepted.

You were more fun when when you were Queen B btw.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Your response tells me that you without a doubt don’t “get it”. You don’t want accept that it is abuse because you’re blinded by your bias. Your feelings on what feels like abuse is irrelevant.

Yea I'm not on board with the modern trend of expanding and stretching the limits of a definition so much that the term becomes functionally meaningless.

What's telling is that you didn't even take the opportunity to answer the question that might have revealed a blind spot on your part. Wouldn't want hold your views under scrutiny now would we?

 

[Sinister]

Concession accepted.

You were more fun when when you were Queen B btw.

You implied that you're not even sure this is "abuse." You and the rest of the "teenaged boys are horndogs so its borderline cool"/double-standard crowd in here have downplayed that since the first page, and you since you chimed in. Its abuse, that's WHY it's wrong. When an adult in literally any position of power or influence over said child sexualizes the child for their own personal gratification and subjects that child to the social and legal risks of everything from unwanted pregnancy, to disease, to being publicly outed...that's what makes it wrong. So saying something as plainly f*ckin stupid as "I'm not sure this is abuse" out of one side of your mouth while saying "its wrong and she should face consequences" shows your completely lack of stability on the subject.

I'd bet this tune changes in a heartbeat if the teacher was a man...and the victim was a boy, even IF that boy is gay.

 

[Sinister]

Your response tells me that you without a doubt you don’t “get it”. Your feelings on what feels like abuse is irrelevant.

Lol@"its not abuse because it doesnt make me think of abuse"

This guy is pretending he doesnt understand why we have laws against ALL adults having sex with children.

Next we'll get the Matt Walsh "what even IS adolescence?" argument

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

You implied that you're not even sure this is "abuse." You and the rest of the "teenaged boys are horndogs so its borderline cool"/double-standard crowd in here have downplayed that since the first page, and you since you chimed in. Its abuse, that's WHY it's wrong. When an adult in literally any position of power or influence over said child sexualizes the child for their own personal gratification and subjects that child to the social and legal risks of everything from unwanted pregnancy, to disease, to being publicly outed...that's what makes it wrong. So saying something as plainly f*ckin stupid as "I'm not sure this is abuse" out of one side of your mouth while saying "its wrong and she should face consequences" shows your completely lack of stability on the subject.

No it shows that your incapable of telling the difference. Which makes sense because you aren't stable.
Try as hard as you want but I made the case that it was wrong while also suggesting that it's not the same. Too bad so sad.

I'm a "victim" btw. I have relevant, lived experience here. Don't speak on my behalf.

I'd bet this tune changes in a heartbeat if the teacher was a man...and the victim was a boy, even IF that boy is gay.

I already spoke to that effect. You would know that if you weren't so busy having your period all over this thread.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

Lol@"its not abuse because it doesnt make me think of abuse"

This guy is pretending he doesnt understand why we have laws against ALL adults having sex with children.

Next we'll get the Matt Walsh "what even IS adolescence?" argument

Lol @ thinking some 13 year old kid isn't sitting there with the biggest smile on his face after getting laid.

You're a virgin. Like this much is obvious. The teacher shouldn't have done what she did and she's a degenerate but this kid isn't turning to drugs or in the same category as a girl who's gone through the same.

But I don't expect you to get it because you also pretend to be a girl on an online karate forum that you moderate LOL

 

[USA!USA!]

No idea. I'm a little flabbergasted. I remember being a late teen (16, 17) and 13 year olds flirting with me and I thought it was the same as a 6 year old flirting with me -- just silly. They're children. It didn't matter if they had been blessed with puberty changes.

I can't imagine being a grown woman and seeing a 13 year old boy, idc if it's LeBron James or Brock Lesnar at 13, and seeing them as a "man" that you want to fuck. That isn't a mentally stable human being.

I don't think anyone is questioning that the Woman was sick. If anyone is, I'd definitely disagree with them there. It's not normal to be attracted to minors, especially when you hold power over them as a counselor or teacher or whatever.

I do think its normal that a teenage boy would want to fuck an attractive woman if given the opportunity, though. It is still against the law - I'm not saying I am for it - but I don't get why it is wrong to say that a teenage boy would voluntarily fuck a hot young woman if given the opportunity. You don't have to think its right and should be happening to come to that conclusion.

 

[Sara]

Lol@"its not abuse because it doesnt make me think of abuse"

This guy is pretending he doesnt understand why we have laws against ALL adults having sex with children.

Next we'll get the Matt Walsh "what even IS adolescence?" argument

Why what does he say? That you’re a child until you’re 18?

 

[Sinister]

Why what does he say? That you’re a child until you’re 18?

No, he says the moment children are capable of doing or considering doing adult sh*t, then they're an adult.

 

[Source]

Yea I'm not on board with the modern trend of expanding and stretching the limits of a definition so much that the term becomes functionally meaningless.

What's telling is that you didn't even take the opportunity to answer the question that might have revealed a blind spot on your part. Wouldn't want hold your views under scrutiny now would we?

I said not to mentions the victims age which should have been an indication to you that I have a problem with that as well.

This isn’t a stretching of the definition of abuse. This situation is the standard of it. Your post is ironic seeing it’s you that are unwilling or more likely incapable of evaluating your own views. You keep holding on to that losing position based on your feelings.

 

[EL CORINTHIAN]

I said not to mentions the victims age which should have been an indication to you that I have a problem with that as well.

This isn’t a stretching of the definition of abuse. This situation is the standard of it. Your post is ironic seeing it’s you that are unwilling or more likely incapable of evaluating your own views. You keep holding on to that losing position based on your feelings.

Still not answering the question I see.