Social Black people are 2.9 times more likely than white people to be killed by cops, report says

all of this will get forgotten in the next police shooting thread and the libs will go back to their old talking points as if this never existed.

You see the right headline and assume you have game breaking evidence. This isn't that.
 
Probably 2.9% more likely to kill cops too. Wonder if there's some correlation there. Will never know for sure though because its my understanding that the violent crime statistics of certain racial demographics arent being accurately tallied. In other news, departments around the nation are reporting steady climbs of violent crimes committed by races marked as 'other' to the tune of 13% or so.
 
Yeah… full of race baiters and grifters maybe



This Harvard professors research paper got buried when he revealed NO bias towards blacks in police shootings… in 2016.

His colleagues turned on him

Just saw this this morning. Likely needs its own thread. But I need to dig into it more.

Don't really post in the WR anymore, but this is the same economist mentioned in the Gay thread (surname, not disparaging remark ... the Harvard president who was ousted over plagiarism post-congressional comments on speech policy regarding Israel) who was essentially censured by Harvard for his work via re-opening sexual harassment charges he had been previously vindicated from.

FWIW, he is back now after a 5 year suspension. I'm curious to see if his work continues in the same venue as before, or if he adjusts to the threat.

P.S. No idea why this is showing up in social media or the WR now, Fryer's work on this subject is ~7 years old at this point. I've always sympathized with him, he is a solid economist who was pushed to loftily positions in part because he checked all the boxes the DEI crowd wanted to see, and then published honest research they felt betrayed them. LOL. I like Fryer, and hope he is the same economist after his unjust persecution. Time to see if he can follow Williams and Sowell, or if he bends the knee.
 
Last edited:
i mean, the guy had to get bodyguards. who do you think those were for?

Death threats from the left are incredibly rare, while incredibly common from the right. One DA in New York refused to prosecute Trump because he didn't want to spend the rest of his life with a protective detail. One comment from Trump about an election fraud conspiracy forced two women to change their identities and move into hiding.

Are you really surprised this economist is still alive?
 
Death threats from the left are incredibly rare, while incredibly common from the right. One DA in New York refused to prosecute Trump because he didn't want to spend the rest of his life with a protective detail. One comment from Trump about an election fraud conspiracy forced two women to change their identities and move into hiding.

Are you really surprised this economist is still alive?
incredibly rare? that's pure lying.
you should go on X and read all the kill whitey comments.
and yeah i'm surprised. the worst of the left are legit psychos. you become a target by demolishing their ideological beliefs, especially the core one which is about oppression, and one might come for you. this guy is brave to come out with his study.
 
Lot of violence coming from the left, is there?

Yes - The Left is very tolerant


After he published the study, “all hell broke loose,” Fryer toldWeiss, noting people “lose their mind when they don’t like the result.”

“I lived under police protection for about 30 to 40 days,” he said during the interview. “I had a seven day old daughter at the time…I was going to the grocery store to get diapers with an armed guard.”

Colleagues warned him not to publish it because it would “ruin” his career, Fryer said.
 
Death threats from the left are incredibly rare, while incredibly common from the right. One DA in New York refused to prosecute Trump because he didn't want to spend the rest of his life with a protective detail. One comment from Trump about an election fraud conspiracy forced two women to change their identities and move into hiding.

Are you really surprised this economist is still alive?
Antifa, your idols, all they do is commit violence
 


This article is absolutely wild and I'm surprised it ever saw the light of day.

"Fryer said people quickly "lost their minds" and some of his colleagues refused to believe the results after months of asking him not to print the data.

"I had colleagues take me to the side and say, 'Don't publish this. You'll ruin your career,'" Fryer revealed."


Imagine telling somebody NOT to publish the factual findings of a study?? How much more proof do we need that this tired old narrative is on death's door and the left if desperately performing CPR to keep it alive?

"The world-renowned economist knew from comments by faculty that he was likely to garner backlash. Fryer admitted that he anticipated the results of the study would be different and would confirm suspicions of racial bias against minorities. When the results found no racial bias, Fryer hired eight new assistants and redid the study. The data came back the same."

This is the craziest part. Fryer WANTED his study to support the "cops are racist" narrative and even redid the whole study in the hopes the original results were wrong. I think it would be much more truthfully symbolic if the dorks who kneel for the National Anthem had their fingers in their ears at the same time.
 
This article is absolutely wild and I'm surprised it ever saw the light of day.

"Fryer said people quickly "lost their minds" and some of his colleagues refused to believe the results after months of asking him not to print the data.

"I had colleagues take me to the side and say, 'Don't publish this. You'll ruin your career,'" Fryer revealed."


Imagine telling somebody NOT to publish the factual findings of a study?? How much more proof do we need that this tired old narrative is on death's door and the left if desperately performing CPR to keep it alive?

"The world-renowned economist knew from comments by faculty that he was likely to garner backlash. Fryer admitted that he anticipated the results of the study would be different and would confirm suspicions of racial bias against minorities. When the results found no racial bias, Fryer hired eight new assistants and redid the study. The data came back the same."

This is the craziest part. Fryer WANTED his study to support the "cops are racist" narrative and even redid the whole study in the hopes the original results were wrong. I think it would be much more truthfully symbolic if the dorks who kneel for the National Anthem had their fingers in their ears at the same time.

And Claudine Gay did her best to bury him and strip his tenure

Mr Roland got an upfront look at the left and ended up red pilled

 
This article is absolutely wild and I'm surprised it ever saw the light of day.

"Fryer said people quickly "lost their minds" and some of his colleagues refused to believe the results after months of asking him not to print the data.

"I had colleagues take me to the side and say, 'Don't publish this. You'll ruin your career,'" Fryer revealed."


Imagine telling somebody NOT to publish the factual findings of a study?? How much more proof do we need that this tired old narrative is on death's door and the left if desperately performing CPR to keep it alive?

"The world-renowned economist knew from comments by faculty that he was likely to garner backlash. Fryer admitted that he anticipated the results of the study would be different and would confirm suspicions of racial bias against minorities. When the results found no racial bias, Fryer hired eight new assistants and redid the study. The data came back the same."

This is the craziest part. Fryer WANTED his study to support the "cops are racist" narrative and even redid the whole study in the hopes the original results were wrong. I think it would be much more truthfully symbolic if the dorks who kneel for the National Anthem had their fingers in their ears at the same time.
It doesn't help the screamers to know their oppression fantasies are imagined. Of course they are going to lose their minds about it.
 
Riley Gaines gets death threats routinely and has been assaulted at speaking events
let's not forget some of the conservatives that went to go to colleges to speak and the number of threats against them where they need to bring additional security. I think a few events even had to be canceled. Like Shapiro for sure
 
This article is absolutely wild and I'm surprised it ever saw the light of day.

"Fryer said people quickly "lost their minds" and some of his colleagues refused to believe the results after months of asking him not to print the data.

"I had colleagues take me to the side and say, 'Don't publish this. You'll ruin your career,'" Fryer revealed."


Imagine telling somebody NOT to publish the factual findings of a study?? How much more proof do we need that this tired old narrative is on death's door and the left if desperately performing CPR to keep it alive?

"The world-renowned economist knew from comments by faculty that he was likely to garner backlash. Fryer admitted that he anticipated the results of the study would be different and would confirm suspicions of racial bias against minorities. When the results found no racial bias, Fryer hired eight new assistants and redid the study. The data came back the same."

This is the craziest part. Fryer WANTED his study to support the "cops are racist" narrative and even redid the whole study in the hopes the original results were wrong. I think it would be much more truthfully symbolic if the dorks who kneel for the National Anthem had their fingers in their ears at the same time.
Yea it's very telling, the demand for racism is very outweighed by the supply. That's why people jumped al in the Smollet thing and other fake hate crimes. The high they get from the virtue signaling from it all is powerful along with the victim complex.
 
More than that, there's a chunk of people that make a living as activists. The study not only destroys their ideology, its also taking money out of their pockets.
well the guy's study was basically dismissing himself.
respect that he published anyway.
imagine how many studies like this, where the conclusion is the beginning of the study, end up hidden or destroyed when the results contradict the world view.
"oh the study results say there's less oppression that i imagined? fuck, gotta destroy that! i need to still get conference invites!"

the intellectual capitulation in social studies is enormous.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top