• Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) We may experience a temporary downtime. Thanks for the patience.

So this kid Kang was supposed to be legit? (Caceres vs Kang Decision Merged Threads)

Why is every close fight a robbery? Alex had sweeps, sub attempts and better ground and pound. TF is everyone bitching about?
 
He gave us a great fight but fell short in the last 3 minutes. You can't blame a newcomer for that, he will make wave at BW.
 
He looked very strong and dangerous. He got a bit mesmerized by Alex's style. I really had no idea who won that fight.
 
That first two rounds were not close. how were they close? Kang was doing better in the standup, getting all the takedowns, submissions,and dominated on the ground. All Alex did in the first two round was escape.

I agree Kang lost the third big and gassed terribly. but he won the first two rounds. I dont see how anyone can argue it.
 
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA where the people talking like that guy was the next Fedor
 
Kang ragdolled him the first two rounds. i have no idea how the judges gave caceres the fight
 
how is his IQ worst?

He was either super gassed or kind of dumb. He should not have stayed in guard, should have tried to get up. He seemed content with pulling guard instead of scrambling to the top in the third round. Very strange because he was getting takedowns almost at will.
 
From what I saw it was a robbery. But I really wasn't watching it closely.
 
223470580_YouMad_xlarge.jpeg
 
all kang did was get top position but never threaten with anything. alex was punching, posturing up striking. Kang never went for anything except for the first round. then he got tired. Thought he could finish alex but Alex was game and kept reversing and rained down punches every chance.
 
29-28 For Kang But It Was A Good Fight

He Should've Won But He'll Be Back
 
Not a robbery. Close fight. Kang looked good, but faded in the third.
 
I think it was 29-28 for Kang. I say Caceres won if it was Pride scoring, though.
 
It was a close fight...
Blame on Kang's fight IQ, he should have won it if he fought smart.
 
that was a fukin robbery. they seriously have to do something about shitty judges. its destroying the sport.
 
Lol all the rounds were not even close. The first two clearly go to Kang, and the third to Caceres. I think it's just because Caceres is a likeable guy, that gave him the nod.
 
Lol all the rounds were not even close. The first two clearly go to Kang, and the third to Caceres. I think it's just because Caceres is a likeable guy, that gave him the nod.

probably the stupidest comment ive seen on this fight
 
Anyone who says this is a robbery wasn't watching the fight and/or is on the Kang hype train. Caceres won a close fight.
 
Back
Top