UFC 201 - Lawler vs Woodley - Atlanta

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL oh no no Barry operates like this:

Says he's now a "pro" and will only give out "free picks" here and there. Blathers on about his amazing capping abilities and all that crap.

When the picks he posts win, he comes back and brags. When they lose, he owns up to it (and also makes excuses) BUT BUT BUT he also claims that it's always just a small hiccup in his otherwise hugely profitable betting career. Even betting something like Rousey at -1250 is somehow made up for in his world by all his other winning. Only...

...he doesn't post his picks here or even let anyone know how to sign up for his service to verify anything so he makes up #'s and comes in here and posts them trying to brag. It's transparent as hell, but he's kept it up for probably close to 2 years now. Yet just prior to that were all his posts about him going belly up (yet again) and needing to take out cash advances on a credit card to continue gambling (these are verified posts of his and I was here for them as was EZFlyer and a few others). Barry basically got tired of being "The cooler" and a punchline here so he invented this new persona and somehow went from pathetic loser to master handicapper in the matter of maybe a month. It's a joke, and he's pathetic.
Oh. I thought he actually had signups, I just wanted to see his record

That's sad
 
Damn I wish I would've bet on KK when she was @ +195 or so.

Glad I got Benoit at +115, now it's basically a pick 'em.

I'm trying to think of some good undercard props -- Pearson by decision maybe? Herman by sub at +600 has pretty good value.
 
In
Damn I wish I would've bet on KK when she was @ +195 or so.

Glad I got Benoit at +115, now it's basically a pick 'em.

I'm trying to think of some good undercard props -- Pearson by decision maybe? Herman by sub at +600 has pretty good value.

Great minds...

I got KK @3.0, Person dec @4.0 and Herman ITD @4.5.
 
In


Great minds...

I got KK @3.0, Person dec @4.0 and Herman ITD @4.5.

I should've pounded KK when she was @ +195. She's at +150 now, I really don't like betting on WMMA, so I'm not sure if I wanna bite on this line or not. Gonna have to see how the rest of my bets go.

I'm torn on Woodley/Lawler too. I've broken down the fight and Lawler should win, but if he survives the first couple of rounds I may just livebet him.
 
I should've pounded KK when she was @ +195. She's at +150 now, I really don't like betting on WMMA, so I'm not sure if I wanna bite on this line or not. Gonna have to see how the rest of my bets go.

I'm torn on Woodley/Lawler too. I've broken down the fight and Lawler should win, but if he survives the first couple of rounds I may just livebet him.

I'm big on Woodley KO, small R1/R2. Really big Fight ends in KO/TKO , small Lawler R4. Will live play Robbie after R2.

Also played Rose SUB small 3.5
 
Barry and Robbie are different.

One is clearly a troll, while the other is unable to interact with his online peers without annoying them.

I rather keep the guy who has offered a couple picks that turned out to be winners, and doesn't expect anything in return aside from everyone to stroke his e-cock a bit.
Eh, id rather keep winning on my own with friendly discussions amongst our community and be rid of the assclown who thinks two picks make him God, and keep the guy who provides epic troll posts. Just me though :)
 
Eh, id rather keep winning on my own with friendly discussions amongst our community and be rid of the assclown who thinks two picks make him God, and keep the guy who provides epic troll posts. Just me though :)
I've not seen you win much though. Didn't you recommend a bet on Peggy Morgan last night? Is that why you're being mean?
 
Last edited:
For anyone new taking a peek here, a few of Barry's "value town" picks from the last couple years (he says he's a dog bettor but these are plays he recommended here):

Rousey over Holm at a whopping -1250
Cain over Werdum at -500 or so
Conor over Nate at -400 or so
Rockhold over Bisping at roughly -700ish

It's kind of tiring constantly reminding everyone of how much a fraud Barry is based on the picks he has recommended here. But for anyone actually considering taking him seriously, think about how much bankroll you'd have left if you bet the above (hint: you'd basically have nothing given those odds, the losses would be staggering). Barry's M.O. is to brag about the +200 dog he hits and pretend we don't remember picks like the above he recommended (among other losers). Oh, and also he's good at making excuses for his losses. "Good" as in they provide some comedy here.

View Barry as anything more than punchline to the peril of your BR. He was literally given the nickname "The Cooler" here and BluntTrauma recently posted a bunch of Barry's posts from as recently as a couple years ago where he's whining about being ruined, taking out cash advances on credit cards to gamble more, etc. The guy is a complete fraud. All the regs here know it. This post is just for anyone who might be dropping in for the first time or who haven't seen Barry's ridiculous nonsense before.

Yeah I remember thinking damn it is hard to be wrong that often. It was actually amazing. I don't know if I ever saw a betting angle better than "opposite of Barry"
 
I've not seen you win much though. Didn't you recommend a bet on Peggy Morgan last night? Is that why you're being mean?
You've been here for what, two events? Trust me buddy, I've hit on more than two dogs Since I've been here. Funny enough, for the Lineker card my big dog bet was at worse odds than yours (Boetsch)

I put my money on Anderson, but I try to see different ways a fight can play out instead of going your route (which will hurt you at some point) of getting overconfident which leads to neglect of other things that can happen.

The saddest part about this is, despite how many people have called you out/tried to help you, you still seem completely dumbfounded why youre unlikable
 
Guys we need a hall of fame thread in this forum. Barry has to be a first inductee.
 
This guy knows his stuff. Respect

I gave reasons why the lines were off and why they would win and they came to fruition exactly how they said they would

I've won everyone 17 units for free while I've been here and not got a single thank you... I wouldn't call that trolling

Thank you, I "liked" your posts I thought that was the longest lasting thing I could do lol
 
You've been here for what, two events? Trust me buddy, I've hit on more than two dogs Since I've been here. Funny enough, for the Lineker card my big dog bet was at worse odds than yours (Boetsch)

I put my money on Anderson, but I try to see different ways a fight can play out instead of going your route (which will hurt you at some point) of getting overconfident which leads to neglect of other things that can happen.

The saddest part about this, is despite how many people have called you out/tried to help you, you still seem completely dumbfounded why youre unlikable

First of all, there's no excuse for recommending a bet on Peggy Morgan

Overconfident? I said Alers only has a wrestling advantage so gave him a small chance to win, I was right. Stanciu didn't have an advantage anywhere so her chances to win were extremely low, I was right. I tried helping people by talking them out of bets on Alers and Stanciu and no one listened

This time I give Serrano a small chance to win with his wrestling. Benoit has much more than a 50% chance to win so there's value. It doesn't matter if it loses, bets like that win longterm. Serrano is a bad bet even if he wins

Why would I care about being unlikeable on a forum and what exactly do I need help with? I'm doing just fine.
 
Just peeping the official bets topic, seems like almost everyone who has bet the Pearson/Masvidal fight is either on o2.5 or one of them to win by decision, myself included.

Obviously no fight result is a lock, but it seems like one of those bets that's difficult to see it going awry, which is odd given how both are legit strikers. Seeing nearly everyone on a bet like that is something you'd expecting with a grinding wrestler as opposed to 2 fighters known for throwing down. It's weird but at the same time it doesn't feel like group think influencing everyone's decision to be on it or anything, just it seeming like such a logical outcome for the fight.

If Pearson ends up sparking out Masvidal in 10 seconds or something, you can blame me for jinxing the fight with this post.
 
Last edited:
First of all, there's no excuse for recommending a bet on Peggy Morgan

Overconfident? I said Alers only has a wrestling advantage so gave him a small chance to win, I was right. Stanciu didn't have an advantage anywhere so her chances to win were extremely low, I was right. I tried helping people by talking them out of bets on Alers and Stanciu and no one listened

This time I give Serrano a small chance to win with his wrestling. Benoit has much more than a 50% chance to win so there's value. It doesn't matter if it loses, bets like that win longterm. Serrano is a bad bet even if he wins

Why would I care about being unlikeable on a forum and what exactly do I need help with? I'm doing just fine.
Well first of all, I didn't reccomend a bet on Peggy Morgan.

You're overconfident. You made it sound like Knight was a lock, and a takedown at the end of the first likely saved him from a loss. People can come to their own conclusions, no one here needs you being so brash. And if you're trying to "talk people out of bets", is that how you think they'll listen?

This isn't about hitting value bets helping you win long term. We all know that.

Well, when everyone considers you an asshole, I just figured maybe you'd wanna check yourself. But if you don't care, than you must enjoy being an egocentric douche. If you like hitting bets and flaunting your ego rather than talking with us productively, fair enough, I guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top