- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Messages
- 18,895
- Reaction score
- 10,154
Lol wtf kind of logic is this
THE sherbro logic. MMAth solves everything.
Lol wtf kind of logic is this
Different style of jujitsu maybe? Maybe he's a closer match weight and cardio wise of Diaz, why have one to train with when you can have bothCan anyone understand why Denis was brought in to teach Conor jits when he is supposedly coached by a second degree black belt?
Why would you do that? I just don't think Kavanaugh's coaching may not be legit.
Need to do a little more research before you post bro. Conor's already said he's certain there'll be a trilogy fight with Nate http://www.mmafighting.com/2016/8/1...of-going-back-to-145-after-ufc-202-interestedno they don't, if conor had won the first fight, this fight wouldn't have happened in a million years. if he gets one back here, he'll start campaigning for a 155 push at the postfight press conference. nate even said as much himself, that this isn't built for him, he knows this is all built for conor.
Magny is 10-1 in his last 11 fights ALL in the UFC. His only loss coming to Maia. It's just really hard not to bet on him at his current price when he's beaten so many top tier WW's.
I have no clue what you're talking about.rankings exist for a reason. a guy who beat gastelum wont lose to a guy who lost to tumenov. Magny has 1 loss to a guy ranked higher than him. larkin has 5 losses to guys ranked lower than magny. is why i pointed out their records. there is no room for flukes etc
obv conor lost to nate so he is not beating him the second time around. same thing
wasnt talking to you kiddoI have no clue what your talking about.
rankings exist for a reason. a guy who beat gastelum wont lose to a guy who lost to tumenov. Magny has 1 loss to a guy ranked higher than him. larkin has 5 losses to guys ranked lower than magny. is why i pointed out their records. there is no room for flukes etc
obv conor lost to nate so he is not beating him the second time around. same thing
LOL, The biggest criticism I have about Magny is that he hasn't been fighting the best fighters in his long run, some people think he lost to Alex Garcia and his Gastelum victory could have been scored a draw.
Need to do
Can anyone understand why Denis was brought in to teach Conor jits when he is supposedly coached by a second degree black belt?
Why would you do that? I just don't think Kavanaugh's coaching may not be legit.
Even if his black belt is legit, which it probably isn't, there is a huge difference between a black belt and Dillon Danis
Lombard and Silva were winning the fights until they gassed. That path of victory won't be available for Magny against LarkinI'm not trying to butt heads, I respect your opinion. But wins over Lombard, Gastelum, and Erick Silva aren't impressive?
I mean I know Larkin beat Lawler back in Strikeforce, but Lawler is a completely different beast now.
His black belt is 100% legitimate
Yeah don't pick a fighter mate you'll get lynched lolPost usada Silva gave Magny a very close fight. Just putting it out there i have no bet or lean really as done no research.
I do have larkin dec but pretty small actually.
the champion is not necessarily ranked 1. then you have people who improved over a longer period of time.Exactly, man. People, who don't get it, look at it this way, when was the last time a UFC champion lost a fight? If you take out Jon Jones vs. the law, it's practically years. Rankings, guys. Rankings.
Long time lurker here!
Looks like money is coming in on Teixeira and Story. Johnson now -165 and Cerrone -115.