UFN 101 pbp/discussion

that had better be

FOTN: brunson-whittaker

POTN: volkanovski
POTN: pedro

nothing else makes sense.

so, naturally, they're gonna screw up FOTN again.
I'd give FOTN to Kelly/Camozzi over Whittaker/Brunson.
 
Announced on the post-fight show:

FOTN Whittaker/Brunson
POTN Whittaker & Pedro
 
Jon Tuck thinks he won every round lol, please cut him.
 
Nah cut him, send him to Bellator then fade him. LOL at Both Mattews and Tuck losing by spilt. At least I parlayed them together. 0-6 on last 6 splits. Chook, Johnson, Pearson, Ottow, Tuck, Matthews.
Johnson is the only one that's bs
 
It's the only one that is clearly bs, there are a few that you could argue either way. I wish you could buy insurance on your bets for splits.
 
It's the only one that is clearly bs, there are a few that you could argue either way. I wish you could buy insurance on your bets for splits.
all the others clearly lost. Matthews is the only iffy one but in the rounds he lost he did nothing while Holbrook was going for subs. Didn't even throw punches while on top, horrible performance
 
all the others clearly lost. Matthews is the only iffy one but in the rounds he lost he did nothing while Holbrook was going for subs. Didn't even throw punches while on top, horrible performance
Matthews need to stop training with his dad and go to a high level camp. Can't believe him and Tuck lost. Both are superior fighters on paper but they just couldn't perform. If you actually listen to that Tuck interview you'll understand how deluded he is, guys a head case.
 
Matthews need to stop training with his dad and go to a high level camp. Can't believe him and Tuck lost. Both are superior fighters on paper but they just couldn't perform. If you actually listen to that Tuck interview you'll understand how deluded he is, guys a head case.
Tuck is just shit, he's a head case

Matthews is 22. I'd never bet on a 22 year old.
 
unless it's an good looking woman
62320e36d84c688485e6a30c1785d9a2.jpg
 
Ended up down 9.5 units after a promising start with a big bet on Lausa.

Played Matthews for 2u at -275. Kalikas warned me that Holbrook could outgrapple him, which I thought was completely insane when I first heard it... but somehow he was right.

Thankfully I only chased 1u on Brunson at evens. He fought like an idiot. I should have known given that that's how he fought Alvey, who you would expect he'd be cautious against.

Noke, Hooker, Roundtree, Ham, and Tuck all let me down as well... had the best possible prices on all of them, at least.

Brutal event.
 
I keep doing the misstake of having too many units on juiced faves in parlays, even though I tell myself all the time to stop doing this. I have to stop, FOR REALS THIS TIME!

Edit: For the record i thought Matthews won r2 and r3. He did more on the feet and the ground was mostly a stalemate. Matthews had top position most of the time while Holbrook was going for subs but never had Matthews in any real danger.
 
Last edited:
I keep doing the misstake of having too many units on juiced faves in parlays, even though I tell myself all the time to stop doing this. I have to stop, FOR REALS THIS TIME!

Edit: For the record i thought Matthews won r2 and r3. He did more on the feet and the ground was mostly a stalemate. Matthews had top position most of the time while Holbrook was going for subs but never had Matthews in any real danger.

Agreed. Ive lost out on 28 units profit over a week cos the judges went against tim and jake. Twice in a week fuckin sucks
 
I think part of my evolution as a gambler has to be growing the balls for a 5u play on a line I see serious value in. For example, Camozzi vs Kelly goes the distance at -105 is one of the best lines of the year. I felt that way strongly, yet only had maybe 1.5u on that line. I was scared away by my o1.5 and Kelly plays, but if I wanna make bank, I think I need to start recognizing when to pull the big play trigger
 
Back
Top