- Joined
- Feb 26, 2017
- Messages
- 2,928
- Reaction score
- 476
Tragic event for me
rewatch it tomorrow u trippin49-46? fuck off, please
i'm pretty fucking shocked that there was not one 47-47 or even a score for moreno. i'm floored.
horrendous night.
No? Round 1 was far from a 10-8 cause no damage was being dealt and no close submissions only control. Round 2-3-4 was pettis for sure and the fifth was questionable... get with it
You have never seen more dominantion displayed than Moreno did in round one? I will rewatch it now lolwow! I bet Sergio BIIIIIG but thought that decision was wrong.
So I think the CORRECT guy won.
The BETTER fighter won.
But if r1 wasn't a 10-8 then what is?
Buuuut.... I thought r3 Sergio was 10-8 as it was extremely lopsided and under new rules its a 10-8
Sorry any Serg backers. I will show you a parlay I have busted with Randa that made me cry if it's any consolation.
I had not a single fucking doubt in my mind that that was a unanimous decisionIt's funny how you act like its inconceivable for draw lol…Moreno didn't win but it def could be judged draw.
Randa lost round 3 when she had such poor positioning when she was in Grasso's guard, allowing an easy push off with the legs for her to get up. At that point, Grasso just tagged her a little and made the Mexico judges job easy.
But if r1 wasn't a 10-8 then what is?
pettis was better and deserved to win for sure. i agree with decisionI had not a single fucking doubt in my mind that that was a unanimous decision
That's crazy. We seen less dominant rounds be scored 10-8 under the new scoring criteria. I'm too tired to think of any specific example but i'm 100% sure of that.I had not a single fucking doubt in my mind that that was a unanimous decision
Why are you assuming judging consistency though? MMA judging has never been consistent and I doubt it ever will be.That's crazy. We seen less dominant rounds be scored 10-8 under the new scoring criteria. I'm too tired to think of any specific example but i'm 100% sure of that.
Similar for me. This event put me back in the black after significant losses last weekend.i would have won about 2k if rashad had just been more active in the clinch, aggravating.
up £654 which is still good, but i need to claw back way more after getting killed the previous 2 events.
Are you even taking into account round 1 could have been 10-8 or that the fight is in Mexico?? Just seems like you are purely basing this off your own views and not thinking about other variables,..,I had not a single fucking doubt in my mind that that was a unanimous decision
Based on previous scorecards with the new judging criteria this should have been 10-8. My assumption was based on that.Why are you assuming judging consistency though? MMA judging has never been consistent and I doubt it ever will be.