UFN 114 PBP/Discussion

Based on previous scorecards with the new judging criteria this should have been 10-8. My assumption was based on that.
The history of scoring fights under the new criteria is extremely short and I think it's wrong to assume we know the direction it's headed. Also are you sure the new scoring was to be used at this event and not the new rules? I heard Stann say something like that but he has been saying a lot of dumb crap recently (Stann Bless).
 
I don't disagree. In fact I would have coached her to lay on Alexa as well. But you could tell from Randa's tired body that if she didn't get kicked off, Grasso would've scrambled out.

Yeah you could be right. Randa was definitely tiring. That was a matter of who wanted it more and was willing to hustle for the win. But Randa has good wrestling and good top control and she should have stuck to her like fucking Velcro. She should've never postured up at all until the ref started issuing warnings. She got greedy and as soon as she gave Alexis just that little bit of space she got her feet on Randas hips, and pushed her off easily. From there it was a formality.

But I did think that was the best Randa that we've ever seen on the octagon in terms of technique, conditioning and physique. You?

BTW: did you do OK tonight?
 
? what fight have you guys been watching?

I mean the first round could have been a 10-8. Plus it's in Mexico. I did think that Pettis won but thought the judges might get it wrong.
 
I had it 49-46 pettis

are all you draw scorers on Moreno???

How is rd 1 a 10-8? There was very little damage and no close sub. 10-8 isn't a horrendous score, but its still a 10-9 to me.

Then pettis won every other round 10-9.

Hit pettis ML and the over.

Went 2-1 on bets and make 2.43u, im not complaining :)

New scoring Rd 1 and even Rd 3 should have been 10-8s

There was a huge difference from those rounds and 2, 4 & 5. That's the reason for the new criteria. It doesn't have to be TOTAL domination now
 
rewatch it tomorrow u trippin
if anyone should have a 10-8 its pettis for fucking moreno up in the third(?), hanging onto someone back without doing anything is not a 10-8 even with the new ruling criteria

This is my view as well. I think it was the 3rd in which Moreno got dominated.

Full disclosure though, I was on Pettis.
 
The history of scoring fights under the new criteria is extremely short and I think it's wrong to assume we know the direction it's headed. Also are you sure the new scoring was to be used at this event and not the new rules? I heard Stann say something like that but he has been saying a lot of dumb crap recently (Stann Bless).
Idk what we are arguing about. You have to base your assumption on SOMETHING so why not on the data we actually have? What else should you base your assumption on? Stann said it multiple times so i'd assume so.
 
I mean the first round could have been a 10-8. Plus it's in Mexico. I did think that Pettis won but thought the judges might get it wrong.
Yeah this pretty much sums my thoughts up…
 
It was a tricky card from the outset. I think we all knew that...some very close ones
 
Imo rd 1 was 10-9

Pettis was in no danger and didn't take any shots.

I put too much stake into it being scored a 10-8. We just don't know what the judges are going to do and I thought it was highly unlikely 3 judges would score it a 10-8

I bet on Moreno ml.

Wil be haunted by visions of the +300 screen on 5 dimes with the enter your password prompt. Got greedy and didn't take it

Upon further review, Pettis easily survived the most dangerous position he could be put in, for 3 minutes. It was a fluke take down that got Moreno there anyway.

Moreno had no chance on the feet and he doesn't have a takedown game. I knew where the fight was gonna go but figured Moreno could win one more round. Dumb of me not to free roll live betting

Gotta be quicker on my decision making live betting. That was easy money
 
Idk what we are arguing about. You have to base your assumption on SOMETHING so why not on the data we actually have? What else should you base your assumption on? Stann said it multiple times so i'd assume so.
There is no pattern in the data we have, and the data we have are very few. I wouldn't make any assumptions.
 
That's crazy. We seen less dominant rounds be scored 10-8 under the new scoring criteria. I'm too tired to think of any specific example but i'm 100% sure of that.

We've seen less dominant rounds scored 10-8 under the old scoring criteria as well.
 
I love live betting


How soon will they limit your bets if you win a lot?
 
2 judges scored r1 a 10-8
 
There is no pattern in the data we have, and the data we have are very few. I wouldn't make any assumptions.
When you get the draw at +3300 in the 5th round it is 100% worth to make that assumption and bet it. I'd do the same bet again without a doubt.
 
Yea. The +300 pettis was gold

On a side note. Did someone really say trippin in here? I think I saw it. Justin Beiber up in here?
 
When you get the draw at +3300 in the 5th round it is 100% worth to make that assumption and bet it. I'd do the same bet again without a doubt.

I think that was a great bet
 
Wow.mBiggest night i have had so far doing this shit!

2 team parlay
Sam alvey + Alejandro perez

Risk:$155.00
Win:$528.85


3 team parlay
Dustin Ortiz + rani yahya + joe morales

Risk:$500
Win:$1,065.09


7 fucking team parlay wtf
Jose quinonez
Dustin ortiz
Jack hermansson
Sergio pettis
Sam alvey
Alexa grasso
Alejandro perez

Risk:$45
Win:$1,455.20

UFN 114 results

Total risk $700
Total profit $3,049.14
Also lost about 5 or 6 long 12 team parlays adding up to $100ish in loss

Like i said biggest night of my 8 month betting stint, couldnt have done it without you fellas. Have bet slips posted in the bet slip thread except the 7 team parlay which ill post tomorrow.
 
The hilarious thing is if u go back and read the PBP everyone was saying Rd 1 was 10-8 and no one was arguing against it. But when the fight changed and it would make a difference in the final score the debate began
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,234,816
Messages
55,309,384
Members
174,732
Latest member
herrsackbauer
Back
Top