- Joined
- Mar 13, 2011
- Messages
- 41,746
- Reaction score
- 22,759
Ah I came on to make a "he couldn't find the right gloves" joke, well done.He wouldn't be able to find a pair of gloves that fit. It's not for him.
Ah I came on to make a "he couldn't find the right gloves" joke, well done.He wouldn't be able to find a pair of gloves that fit. It's not for him.
You can.I hope I can change my vote.
I like this question, let's see if we can work with this. Not that I dislike the others, mind you.Forgot this question.
* In an recent article, sherdog journalist Eric Stinton -- a scholar and wordsmith of great renown -- said that Poirier vs Hollaway and Kelvin vs Israel prove that you don't need bad blood to have a badass fight. But that begs the question, ignoring hype and marketing, do you guys think that heated feuds actually produce better fights overall?
What would they do, throw in Conor instead? And make Ferguson vs Poirier, the battle of the interims?I feel Poirier is gonna get screwed one way or another.