In hindsight best value on the card was Zalal ML and Valentina ITD.
What does this mean, exactly? Are you just picking random bets that hit? If that's the case, Williams KO round 1 prop against Morono was clearly the best value.
But if you mean predictable bets, neither Zalal ML at even +200 and especially not Valentina ITD at +170 were obviously sound.
Zalal-Lingo was a fight with limited information, as we knew so, so little about Lingo aside from him having tremendous boxing. We had no clue what his takedown defense was like or how he looked off the bottom, or his cardio.
We knew a lot more about Zalal; namely that his boxing was very raw and mediocre, his defense flawed, that he is a very average wrestler (being taken down at will by Mariscal and struggling to take down anyone half-decent) with okay jits, and his cardio is decent.
Zalal won by putting on his track shoes for the entire fight, avoiding any sort of toe-to-toe exchanges, and clinching for dear life at every opportunity. A smart strategy, and one that not many 23 year-olds are able to implement, let alone so well.
Thus, there was no reason to think Zalal at +200 was necessarily value with such unknown variables unless you just like to cap every young, talented unknown like Lingo as being +100 whenever he steps up in competition.
And if that's so, okay, you win on Zalal here, but you lost your shirt on Bochniak against Woodson, or Shahbazyan versus Stewart, Byrd, and Tavares with that same approach.
As for Valentina ITD or Valentina decision, I've said it earlier in the topic; Valentina never, ever forces anything. She takes whatever her opponents give her and nothing more. Deciding whether she is going to finish or simply win a dominant decision is a fool's errand.
If Chookagian merely wanted to survive to the final bell, like Carmouche, she absolutely could have. Instead, she actually tried to win, and was finished thanks to the additional risk. Nevermind that the stoppage was a little premature, as Jacob Montalvo suddenly suffered a horrible flashback to what happened to Mario Yamasaki when he allowed Valentina to inflict GNP on an opponent on a similar level to what we frequently see in men's MMA that go the distance.
A ITD choice mostly dependent on one fighter's mindset and some random circumstances with a takedown and referee? That's not solid, even at +170.
I wasn't a fan of the Valentina decision prop everyone was hitting, but excluding hindsight bias, I'm also not going to pretend that Valentina ITD was particularly good, either.