well of course there's hindsight bias, but I remember doing my weak form of taping and thinking something along 'she might could', you get me? I wound up betting ribas in my parlay just to play it safe (lol, i bet fucking rountree anyways) but even so, there sure was value in her KO line, which even though was her only path to victory, is listed as +1415 on sportbets and 5dimes (i saw it on bestfightodds archive). that's value for sure, ain't it?
The TKO/KO prop does indeed look like value, but on the flipside, I can understand why it wasn't hit hard.
The most relevant question in this case isn't "was this value?" Of course looking back at the exact way the fight ended will yield some insane plus props. Rather, it's "was this
predictable?"
In this case...somewhat.
Marina Rodriguez definitely hurt Randa Markos, Jessica Aguilar, and Cynthia Calvillo badly with strikes during her UFC career (not so much Carla Esparza or Tecia Torres), but she wasn't able to finish any of them.
In Amanda Ribas, we're not only talking about someone with much better movement and defense than any of those past opponents, but someone who can take her down at will and avoid all that stand-up unpleasantness.
If we assume Marina was a little unlucky and that she would normally knock out someone the likes of Markos or Calvillo 25% of the time, how low does it go for someone who can take her down any time she pleases who is far more difficult to hit on the feet? Is it 10%? 5%? Hard to say, right?
At 10%, the line is value. At 5%, it's not.
An example of a predictable line was that Pena should be bet hard at big plus numbers after losing the opening round to McMann.
We've literally seen numerous fights where McMann wins or even dominates round 1 only to lose (almost Murphy, Tate, Viera, and especially Reneau) as well as numerous fights where Pena badly loses round 1 and comes back to win (Zingano, Montano). That was absolutely value at +250.