Search results for query: *

You seem unable to distinguish between an entire nation and its paramilitary arm that wasn't even democratically elected. You also seem to be unclear on why the US is pressuring its proxy to dial back operations and avoid excessive casualties. There's pretty of blame to go around, and Israel...

Yes, but cheerleading and justifying what shouldn't be acceptable in the first place is baffling, both morally and strategically in this situation.

For violence and war, to put it mildly. You seem to be implying that children are fair game in war.

They are overwhelmingly civilians who never had a chance to vote for the government. By that logic, middle schoolers in America are fair game for their parents voting for GW Bush.

If that's the case, why has the Japanese government been so obsessed with increasing the supply of labor through a higher birth rate?

What legal hurdles do you think your ancestors had to overcome to become Americans?

What's the definition of loitering in your mind? Or to put it more concretely, how does a law distinguish between someone loitering on the side walk for 2 hours and me standing on the sidewalk for 2 hours because I like the view? A basic rule of thumb with laws like this is a person has to be...

Most vagrancy laws would be tossed out by courts if challenged. That's partly why they are not enforced very vigorously.

Why is it irrelevant? If not then 1900. The idea that the minimum wage has never helped is wildly ignorant.

Your entire premise ignores that supply is not finite. They have repeatedly gotten ahead in human history. Are you really arguing that the lives of those in the bottom third of income are worse now than they were in 1800?

I'd explain how that's shitty sampling but I don't think you've ever taken a basic stats class based on your logic.

People act like this also has not been studied to death by economists (actual economists not popular ones who aim for cable news spots). The evidence is pretty strongly in favor of the labor market and economy being able to absorb fairly large minimum wage increases without too much pain.

Well it's a good thing that background checks aren't only reliant on records. And again, men qualify for Medicaid if they meet the income limits. I don't know where you are getting this fantasy that men do not qualify for welfare. Not to mention I don't know what one would describe unemployment...

Well it's a good thing that more bodies paying into the system helps benefit the social safety net and otherwise improve the country's overall economy. No, and they already do not. Not to mention this thread has nothing to do with illegal immigration.

Lexmark was too busy using illegal labor tbh haha. It's mostly HP that has locked down the cartridge grift and subscriptions most. And none taken, I don't work in the print industry.

So you too don't wanna answer what welfare programs these refugees would get access to, even though everyone in this thread is convinced it's a gravy train? Hint...the point of these refugees is they become citizens and thus net benefits to the US ledger, civically and economically. It's how...

Yeah, the HP cartridge and ink subscription models are some of the most anti-consumer business practices you'll find today, on top of cannibalizing the market long term. But it makes money short term so print companies don't care at this point.

How did you arrive at those estimates? You're quoting me a cost approaching annual tuition for private colleges.

They would be coming from Egypt, which is not a warzone (at least that part of the country). You keep insisting that the government won't screen them despite the story literally saying they will. You're the one trying to argue with all the facts we have so far. And men quality for cash welfare...

How many cities do you think have a homeless population of 2500 or more do you think? You're acting like every random city and town has this problem. Also how did you arrive at your estimate that housing and feeing 2500 people for a year costs $100 million?