They are overwhelmingly civilians who never had a chance to vote for the government. By that logic, middle schoolers in America are fair game for their parents voting for GW Bush.
What's the definition of loitering in your mind? Or to put it more concretely, how does a law distinguish between someone loitering on the side walk for 2 hours and me standing on the sidewalk for 2 hours because I like the view?
A basic rule of thumb with laws like this is a person has to be...
Your entire premise ignores that supply is not finite.
They have repeatedly gotten ahead in human history. Are you really arguing that the lives of those in the bottom third of income are worse now than they were in 1800?
People act like this also has not been studied to death by economists (actual economists not popular ones who aim for cable news spots). The evidence is pretty strongly in favor of the labor market and economy being able to absorb fairly large minimum wage increases without too much pain.
Well it's a good thing that background checks aren't only reliant on records.
And again, men qualify for Medicaid if they meet the income limits. I don't know where you are getting this fantasy that men do not qualify for welfare. Not to mention I don't know what one would describe unemployment...
Well it's a good thing that more bodies paying into the system helps benefit the social safety net and otherwise improve the country's overall economy.
No, and they already do not. Not to mention this thread has nothing to do with illegal immigration.
Lexmark was too busy using illegal labor tbh haha. It's mostly HP that has locked down the cartridge grift and subscriptions most.
And none taken, I don't work in the print industry.
So you too don't wanna answer what welfare programs these refugees would get access to, even though everyone in this thread is convinced it's a gravy train?
Hint...the point of these refugees is they become citizens and thus net benefits to the US ledger, civically and economically. It's how...
Yeah, the HP cartridge and ink subscription models are some of the most anti-consumer business practices you'll find today, on top of cannibalizing the market long term. But it makes money short term so print companies don't care at this point.
They would be coming from Egypt, which is not a warzone (at least that part of the country). You keep insisting that the government won't screen them despite the story literally saying they will. You're the one trying to argue with all the facts we have so far.
And men quality for cash welfare...
How many cities do you think have a homeless population of 2500 or more do you think? You're acting like every random city and town has this problem.
Also how did you arrive at your estimate that housing and feeing 2500 people for a year costs $100 million?
The better question is what makes you think they can't be screened? They are presumably interviewed and have to offer some references, plus a relative.
And yeah the US let plenty of IRA members and sympathizers emigrate.
What people coming through the border are screened? And the article you...
If only there was a way to screen refugees. It's not like they have to jump through many security and bureaucratic hurdles and also have a relative in the US.
I suppose in the 80s you were clamoring for the US go stop Irish immigration cuz there were too many IRA sympathizers and members?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.