Flailing turned up to maximum I see. Pointing out how idiotic the "Soros funded" argument was in this case isn't defending Soros.
It's exactly what I said it is. Pointing out how that term is used by people who are too lazy and stupid to formulate an actual fact-based argument. In this case...
All you're telling me by repeating these idiotic claims is that either you're a disingenuous liar, or your reading comprehension is elementary school level.
I'll make it real simple for your dumb ass.
- I haven't defended any campaign financing by Soros or anyone else.
- I have pointed...
That's what you're going with? Pathetic. I'd love to make it illegal for billionaires to make unlimited contributions to politics. But the conservatives on the supreme court made sure that is impossible for at least another generation. I pointed out, that Soros, the conservative boogeyman...
Ah yes, so you've just assumed that they can't be fair because of where the trial is located. Solid reasoning as always.
So many excuses. So many tears. You're pathetic.
How exactly is it easy to illustrate that the jury is an "abomination" in this case? You don't even know how they're going to vote.
I welcome prison for Trump too if he's convicted. Good to see we're on the same page in regard to a lifelong piece of shit, conman, getting what he deserves from...
Of course he ignored that part. It doesn't fit the fantasy narrative he's created, where Trump is just an innocent victim in all of this. What a clown.
And you've got proof that the 300k since 2017 is why these protests took place? You know what is a more realistic answer for who is behind these protests?
The students participating in them. Pretty damn simple. No need to shoehorn in big bad Soros.
Reread my post. I said it's ridiculous to claim he's somehow behind these protests as the NYPost article suggests and the numbers they dug up to "prove" that are equally ridiculous.
The fact that you keep using the term "pro-criminal" DAs says to me all I need to know about how honest of a...
This is literally the exact same argument made against creating the minimum wage in the first place. Yet it didn't destroy the economy. It's bullshit. This subservience to corporate interest over the basic needs of employees hasn't always existed. FDR proved they could be reigned in.
Wow, contributing to political campaigns!?!?! That monster. He does the same fucking thing that other billionaires and multi millionaires do during elections.
But the right has created such a Boogeyman caricature of the man, that "soros-funded" is all that needs to be said to send the mouth...
By allowing the companies to pay poverty wages it means many of their employees are going to be using tax payer funded public assistance. So you either force companies to pay more (through minimum wage increases) or continue the cycle.
I didn't say anything about a spouse and kids. A vehicle...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.