Search results for query: *

Good.

Religion of peace.

That's terrible, I hope that captain gets caught and dies a slow death in prison.

Huge if true.

Well those stats are very misleading, the Ortega vs Moicano fight wasn't a comeback at all, all 3 judges had it at one round a piece going into the third, and Brian was winning the third when he got the submission.

Mostly agree, but Usman vs Edwards 2 is nowhere close to being in the same league as GSP/Serra, I mean the underdog won, but that underdog also won the rematch and the matchup between them was never considered a big mismatch. GSP is lightyears ahead of Serra, yet he managed to lose to him...

Quality posting sherbro my personal favourite was that 2006 open weight because Mirko winning it was extra special but there is no wrong answer. They were all epic.

The funny thing is even you don’t believe that nonsense.

LOL @ Ken Shamrock ahead of Cro Cop and DC.

You have a hot prospect coming in against a seasoned champ and he ends up losing the battle while winning the war. Both Erceg and GSP made a fundamental error that cost them the fight they were on their way to winning. I don’t know how good Mokaev is, but I can’t see too many guys being able...

I see you are both a gentleman and a scholar.

Yeah, I don’t see any change whatsoever, on the whole card last night was there even a single round that was scored anything other than 10-9? I don’t think so. Sure, I agree with you about the 10-10 as well, an average Fight card realistically should have rounds scored anywhere 10-10 right down...

Again as I mentioned above, a big part of the judging problem is that they feel compelled to score every round 10-9. That should only be if a round was very close, but anytime a guy clearly wins a round and inflicts more damage it should be 10-8 or less. That would fix a lot of problems and...

Part of the problem is their obsession with scoring every round 10-9. You gotta damn near kill your opponent to get a 10-8.

I would definitely prefer that they judge the fight as a whole, if they wanna give fighters a break every 5 minutes that's fine, but take the entire fight into account. IF you're not gonna judge the fight as a whole, then YOU CAN'T just judge every round 10-9. Yes I know they give a 10-8 once...

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you didn't even bother reading my initial post. If you took 30 seconds to read it, you would realize that I MYSELF SCORED IT FOR PANTOJA because I knew they would give it to him BASED ON THE CURRENT SCORING CRITERIA. What I'm...

Again, don't disagree with any of that, and didn't really care who won it, I like both fighters just the same so not at all mad about one guy beating the other, just watching it as a neutral fan and noticing a very flawed system. And yeah I'm ok with SLOOOOOW change, but how fucken slow do they...

Except "the fight" wasn't very close at all.

I don't disagree with any of that, but I think you missed my point. I'm telling you that I myself scored it for Pantoja knowing what the scoring criteria is, but it feels silly because I know that the guy who lost the decision actually won the fight and quite convincingly. I'm not criticizing...

What you're saying is true in many cases, it makes sense in close decisions where both guys did comparable damage, comparable control, etc. To me it doesn't ring true at all in this case because there's not much debate, everyone seems to be in agreement that Pantoja was the one who got his ass...