Search results for query: *

Could you elaborate on what you mean by the question, “who would enforce it”? What the rioters did was a last ditch effort to stall the certification and scare Pence into either accepting the fake electors, or accept none of the “disputed” (by Trump) electors and and send the vote to the House...

Should’ve just stopped at “Jan 6 Inches.” Maybe give it a subtitle, like: “January 6 Inches: Fuck Like Hell or You Won’t Have A Country Anymore.” Hmm. Or should we spell it “Cuntry”? I probably shouldn’t quit my day job.

Jesus Fucking Christ. This shit, I swear. <Neil01>

A true pioneer. RIP to him.

Fantastic response. If I was Judge Cannon, I’d set a hearing date 6 months from now for us to explore this “nope” business further. <lol><lmao>

What’s happening in FL isn’t an issue of rights, in an issue of Cannon’s complete inability to handle preliminary issues and to tell the difference between a motion that has legal basis and one that is frivolous.

Hey, that’s not true. I’m following these cases pretty closely, reading court filings, reading/listening to legal analysis, all kinds of things. The bickering is just a bonus. ;)

It honestly is really difficult to tell. I think it’s probably some of both; she favors Trump, but is also totally our of her league dealing with a case like this. <WhatIsThis> This is some projection. Right now, there are righties who believe that all those boxes of classified info which...

Well, she isn’t doing her job, Heretic. That’s kind of the point. Any experienced judge would move through these motions very quickly. There’s not a single good reason for it to take nearly a year to even decide preliminary issues like CIPA, and my saying so has nothing to do with my liberal...

Not what I said, but of course this is typical for you. I said she’s either biased, incompetent, or both. This case has been going on for nearly a year (more than 10 months), and not only do we not have a trial date even on the calendar, but important preliminary issues like CIPA Sec 5 have...

To your first paragraph, it *is* actually coordinated to a large degree, but not for tinfoil reasons. Since these are criminal cases, Trump has to be in present court for them, so they do schedule these things. For example, at one point Trump’s attorney tried to delay the NY trial on the basis...

13 songs you listen to when you're angry to blow off steam. 1. Under My Skin - Mudvayne 2. Downset - Ritual 3. The Jam - Eton Rifles 4. Korn - Good God 5. Papa Roach - Between Angels and Insects 6. Anti - Nowhere League - I Hate People 7. W.A.S.P. - Mean Man 8. Amduscia - Killing Mission 9...

I don’t see why it would. What the Board of Elections did is reprimand Fulton County because they (the Board) believes Fulton double-scanned some ballots during the recount. I don’t know that has actually been proven, nor would it change the election result in GA, or negate any of the charges...

Fedor was at 1.0 or so I believe, through his undefeated run.

I will also add that the other issue is influencing the jury. Saying, “the judge’s daughter once worked for Kamala Harris” is one thing (assuming that is in fact true). Calling the judge crooked and conflicted is baseless slander, and claiming all legal experts agree there is no case is just...

But if the jury finds Trump guilty and there’s reason to argue they weren’t impartial, it’s grounds for appeal, or even a mistrial. So we cannot just let anything go. I know this next point would shock Trump or his supporters, but Donald Trump is not the only person in that courtroom with...

I don’t think it’s to reinforce a weakness in the claim as much as it is to preemptively respond to and negate a potential counter-argument—-and that’s hardly propaganda. People do it in debates all the time. But not the 6th? Gag orders are far from uncommon. This gag order, as I understand...

Ahhhh, now we’re getting down to business. And here I thought you truly, sincerely wanted to know what this was about. ;) But you knew exactly what this is about. Let’s proceed then. As you probably know, Trump has 4 criminal cases pending. And I’ll be honest: I don’t know of another rich...

But do you really sound like a Bad Mother Fucker if they have to preface it with “Mini”?? <lol>

No, he could’ve done that without falsifying business records. What the trial is about—that was your question, right?—is illegally falsifying business records to cover up payments made to kill a story that would ostensibly harm Trump in the election, in an attempt to manipulate and undermine...