Search results for query: *

1. The Mueller Investigation was not found to be a lie. That’s complete nonsense. 2. The laptop story was so fucking weird that Fox passed on running it, and the NY Post writers only agreed to do it if their names were kept off the byline. The fact that some fishy, sus, weird-ass shit...

Based on your link, that Eagle Rare for 38 Euros is a great deal. That would be my choice for a classic bourbon experience for you. edit: haha I didn’t see how old your post was, and that I answered before with the same recommendation lol. I’ve tried Eagle Rare several times since I...

The Unicorn Killer! Great pick. For whiskey nerds, a unicorn is something like very rare, expensive, and hard to find. That Knob Creek holds its own with most anything, is readily available and about $50-$55. That’s why it’s called a Unicorn Killer. Here’s two more great unicorn killers...

Oh yeah! That one is—was?—only available in airports I think. Is that where you bought it? I’ve never had the chance to try it, but 100 proof is my perfect proof. Love whiskey at that proof.

Um… trying to get Congress to do their fucking job maybe? Executive Orders are frequently subject to legal challenges, and really isn’t the ideal way to handle things like this. Congress, you may recall, is supposed to pass laws. It’s especially laughable because the GOP isn’t getting any...

Since this post of mine is old, I wanted to update it. Regular Jack Daniels is still trash—but they’ve been putting out some amazing stuff otherwise. The Jack Daniels 10 Year, 12 Year, and Barrel Proof Rye are fantastic.

Yeah it’s ridiculous. Last bottle I got was $38.99, which is a steal imo. But I wouldn’t pay more than $50 or so for it. If I want a 10 year aged, 90 proofer, Russell’s 10 is readily available and is $31.99 in my neck of the woods.

Pics of digital feet?

I enjoyed the video, and honestly a Yale law professor like Jed Rubenfeld is quite a refreshing change from some of your other sources ;) I get that it’s kind of presumptuous of a non-lawyer like me to find fault, but he said a few things that I do disagree with or take issue with. 1. I...

I don’t actually ever see you source anything that you say, if I’m being honest. As far as I can tell from our discussions, you operate off of pure emotion and your subjective feeling and experience. Anything that disagrees with your emotional perception must be invalidated, although you don’t...

This might be a first, but I don’t really disagree much with what you said. I also noticed that bit where they thought Merchan might require unanimity to be safe. The way I think of that though, is: let’s pretend they charged Trump with all 3 of those object offenses, and the jury split 4-4-4...

You seem to be making the same mistake I talked about, and should read the article I posted. The jury must—and did—agree unanimously to every count of falsifying records that Trump was found guilty of. They also all unanimously agreed that he did so with intent to commit or conceal a secondary...

The judge is correct though, from my understanding. I’ve mentioned this before, but there are NY cases on record in which the defendant was actually charged with both the records offenses and whatever the object offense was, the jury found them guilty of the records falsification but either...

Higher than a highly accurate, multiply time Pulitzer Prize winning outlet? I eagerly await your list of approved sources, which we both know will never be forthcoming. But back to the point: both Trump and Hunter Biden have clean criminal records (well, Trump did before this), so jail time...

No, I’m going by what most legal experts believe and analysis has shown. Your favorite media outlet, the NYT, analyzed thousands of cases and found that the majority didn’t get jail time in similar circumstances. It would seem to me that if Trump gets a significant prison sentence where others...

I don’t mean to beat a dead horse here, but we know for a fact he tried to submit fake electors so he could “win” states where he didn’t have the votes to win. That’s serious. I take my right to vote seriously.

Hmm, I smell a bit of sarcasm here. I don’t think a person with Trump’s record and offenses would necessarily get jail time, and I don’t think it’s accurate to say that a lack of jail time means it’s all for show. Should we say that about Hunter Biden’s trials, or any average citizen’s felony...

You’re welcome. You too can look up these very public pieces of information, you know. I do think Trump has a couple of avenues for appeal, so bear with me until the end. But I don’t think this is quite the matryoshka doll that you do. There are a lot of different ways and reasons to...

Even if he avoids prison, I think it’s beyond embarrassing that a POTUS would need to get special permission to enter 38 different t countries because of his status as a felon. How embarrassing.

With all due respect, you’ve totally lost the plot here. Trump is part of conspiracy to disenfranchise tens of thousands of lawful voters (including me). No candidate we’ve ever had is worse than that. Biden being old, or not liking his immigration policy or whatever, is small potatoes...