This is the thing the casuals don't get. You choose a style and everything that comes with it.
You choose an exciting hands down head out bait style? then you have to take when that fails and you get knocked out and go on a 6 fight skid.
Anderson simps be cherry picking a discrete "oh prime...
which one of us has a cheerleader they are egging on, arguably in a child like manner?
The irony being the cheer leader is inadvertently shooting them in the foot
too easy - its your own posts
just give it up bro
You can never win when its your own posts which are your undoing.
[edit] even to entertain your laughable cope, the article I linked is titled
"Spelling has nothing to do with intelligence, so why do we keep acting like it does?"
so even if you are not specifically saying a low IQ, you are (undeniably) attempting to use spelling to gauge someones intelligence...
lmao the cope
the back tracking - "I never specifically said" lmao, you really trying to take that out????
Go read your posts kid (I know your'e an adult, but your'e acting like a kid). You tried to imply that an online handle is an indicator of how one spends their time. It is not. Its an...
That was more of a low key insult than a factual statement, again context. You probably very limited on both IQ and EQ.
See how I instantly addressed that?
yet you can't address anything... lmao
You've taken the L that you don't know the difference between a something thats purely an...
it writes itself, it really does.
Think hard sherbro. Am I commenting on the specifics of what was said in his post? or am I commenting how sherdog likes to ignore context
what would the example I provided indicate?
think hard sherbro
hahah are you 12? did you just get back from the spelling bee and trying to flex on me?
Firstly you have to establish that spelling mistakes are correlated with a low intelligence, which they are not...
just stop bro, you tried to make a correlation between online handle and what someone might have been doing with their time - as if their handle implies how someone might spend their time. I pointed out that all that is, is an assumption. Which is correct.
Which is different to making...
hahah love the projection there kid, which one of us in a persistent online circle jerk of irrational hate against certain UFC fighters?
also how do you keep up the consistency of 15 posts a day, day in day out? you do have a life outside of this don't you?
sorry must have confused you, pretty sure I didn't agree (or disagree) with his post just offered an explanation as to why this forum loves to take things at face value without context of detail
and then used Izzy / Alex as an example.
If you want my opinion on it, 1-0-1 really requires a...
lmao, just because your'e the one guy without a record breaking incel post count to tenure ratio doesn't invalidate anything I said. Your'e an outlier.
But yeah, you still fall folly to this forums low IQ way of thinking - what your handle is doesn't actually prove anything, I may have played a...
a bit rich coming from a sher... bro
Of course any post actually fact checking appears delusional to you, your'e a sher"bro" lol
Go look at what I posted here, pulled up one guy saying Izzy is next to useless for the company, reminded they / them that Izzy is also the highest paid guy for good...
lol and then what happened? he broke all your hearts by breaking Costa
aww the incel is mad he (they / them) got a reality check that the warped little world of shertards doesn't call any shots... Dana does.
I joke your'e an incel, but whats with your post count? you did what took me near 2...
dude its sherdog, that is peak analysis for most of these posters, they are not that smart to begin with, and then they get in this echo chamber of stupidity
Remember the whole "0-3" Izzy - Pereira thing? when it was obvious Izzy was always better (well to anyone who actually looked into the...
Dude stop coping. It is fact Izzy called him up and twisted the UFCs arm to get Sean this title shot
Credit to Sean being ready and going out winning of course. But don't discount how it all happened prior to them stepping in cage.
Bro these incels on sherdog @TempleoftheDog get mad at the mere mentioning of this being a possibility lmao
They are coping that much over this loss. Like any talk of rematch or izzy winning said rematch has them shook.
Except miss out the bit where he's no 5 not anywhere near a title shot until Izzy calls him up and convinces the UFC to book Sean in for Sydney.
Just over look that bit. I guess when you're a mix of butthurt and deluded (by hey most are here on sherdog) you need to cherry pick whenever you can.
If only keyboard tappers like yourself called the shots and not Dana.
Imagine if the criteria for rematch privilege wasn't being an active champ or putting in work for the UFC, but instead if you're loved / hated by a keyboard tapping online mma community.... imagine
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.