Search results for query: *

No need to go that far back in time. Had it happened at any point prior to Cold war era, history would have remembered it only if some important figures had died from it. I can easily imagine a sentence like this in children's schoolbooks: "President X died that year from a particularly bad...

Yes, it was exaggerated, but not always by design. What's different about today's world is that nowadays everyone can be a sort of media. Just look at celebrities. They have millions of followers on social media who look upon them as gods. All it takes is one popular hypochondriac, and all of a...

Nah, it's just a cheap way to score political points with Ukraine since they know it's not going to happen.

Seeing her talk openly about it makes one think. I mean, if those biolabs are indeed that shady, shouldn't their owners and financers talk about possible complications in private?

He didn't say it; he worded it in such a way that simple-minded people who read it get this impression by "reading" between the lines. And he, along with the Western media in general, has been successful. There are tons of retards out there who believe Russians will literally die of hunger due...

I've linked the article in my previous post. No, my analysis of his article is that he worded it - at least in the beginning - as if he wanted to announce the literal doom of Russia, but at the end, when the time to outright say it came, he retreated from that position by stating their farmers...

If this is what you were referring to, I just read it, and must say I am very disappointed. He basically spewed a whole lot of bombastic doomsday statements, only to finish the article with: "I mean, of course eventually farmers and institutes will come up with something." In other words, they...

No, I think that Russians are perfectly capable of producing their own agricultural equipment. If they can construct nuclear bombs, then they can construct the thrashing machines. If it were that easy to topple Russia, the West would have done it a long time ago.

No, not "maybe". It's a historical fact. Something, and by that I mean common sense, tells me they'll be able to replace those parts with their own and survive.

Empty stomachs is the tipping point for Russians, and it's not going to happen.

Tu parles français? Si c'est le cas, regarde cette vidéo:

To those who want to find out a bit more about the origins of this conflict, here's a documentary by Anne-Laure Bonnel (a French journalist) on the civil war in Donbass:

Witnessing suffering of individuals is more emotionally impactful than that of groups. It might sound strange to some people, but a photo of a hundred pregnant women running away from bombs won't move as many people as a photo of one pregnant woman doing the same. Every movement, every important...

Allegedly, the deputy mayor of Mariupol is already accusing the Russians of not respecting the ceasefire.

Imagine the outrage and the overall narrative if the roles were reversed. Yikes...

Actually, his prediction makes perfect sense since no matter how it ends, the West will portray it as Putin's defeat. Since we're posting in a Chomsky-related thread, I must say it's a pity Baudrillard isn't around to witness this. His take on the propaganda war would have been most...

You think? If I had to bet, I would say he will make it out of this alive...

Ahh, you beat me to it... I was just about to ask: "Isn't it amazing how an invading force can simultaneously be on its knees and wreak havoc?"

<[analyzed}>

The key part is available in this clip. The rest of it was usual: "You attacked us; we didn't attack you!" "We're not terrorists!" etc.