Search results for query: *

  1. B

    Dana White's Contender Series - Season 6, Week 7 - September 6

    Gabriel is the rightful favorite but the line is getting out of hand now. Gabriel wants to put you out or sub you, and fights similar to his training partner, Luque. In that sense, he can be hit just like Luque because of his forward pressure, and he got rocked and dropped already in one of his...
  2. B

    UFC 273: Volkanovski vs. Korean Zombie

    When has Malott won anything by outworking his opponents when he isn’t getting a round 1 finish? He has never won a fight outside of round 1 in his career, and he hasn’t been to round 2 in almost 7 years. That’s insane to bet a favorite just on that alone, you have no clue what his cardio is...
  3. B

    PFL Challenger Series 6

    This! Not sure how anyone can be confident in Cunningham at this line, absolutely insane. The guy has never been 3 mins into a MMA fight, fighting super low level competition and using amateurish head and arm throws, the guy is super green for MMA. Buckley is low level too, but he has has some...
  4. B

    Bellator 275: Mousasi vs. Vanderford

    Lmao, it’s a good thing you didn’t follow his other bets. Two months into this year and he hasn’t even made a profit yet, -4.86 for the year. But hey you can purchase his betting package if you like losing money.
  5. B

    UFC Fight Night - Barboza vs Chikadze - Offical discussion

    Some thoughts on this Lee/Rod fight. Lee almost always wins round 1. He has finished Cheisa and GG in round 1. He won round 1 off Ferg, RDA and Al as well as others. I think you wait to see how round 1 goes, how Rod is defending tds and how Lee looks in round 1. If he wins round 1 like he has...
  6. B

    UFC Fight Night - Barboza vs Chikadze - Offical discussion

    Not to pile it on, but I think the true successful MMA bettors know it’s not about having a high accuracy, it’s about beating the bookies and identifying value plays. The proof is in the pudding. Here is results of my bets lifetime and you will see, accuracy never tells the whole story...
  7. B

    Bellator 264: Mousasi vs Salter

    As the other guy said, kind of hard to fade a +300 dog but i guess you think so badly of Cummings, but there is barely any tape at the same time. Regardless, at the end of the day you’re also putting your faith in a HW who hasn’t shown much himself outside of 2 quick wins over bums and showing...
  8. B

    Bellator 264: Mousasi vs Salter

    <mma4> haha not bad, not bad. I like it!
  9. B

    Bellator 264: Mousasi vs Salter

    Lmao at these Franklin bets. Guys that a really square bet. Franklin is super green, he has only 3 pro fights and against serious bums. Two quick finishes over bums and another fight where he didn’t get the round 1 finish he gassed badly and was put in some tough spots, got full mounted in...
  10. B

    UFC 265: Lewis vs Gane - Discussion Thread

    Oh man, kinda bummed discussion on this card has already started due to low limits at the moment for this card. But that said the cat is out the bag already, Cheisa is a play for sure at these odds in a nutshell. Luque has faced lots of strikers in his career and not many if any grinders and...
  11. B

    UFC Fight Night - Strickland vs Hall - Official discussion

    You missed the point, Belal was not said to have great takedown defense before that fight, or it hadn’t been tested much before that Maia fight. It was a big assumption Belal wouldn’t have good takedown defense and Maia could look -500 lol. Assumptions and actually seeing it is two different...
  12. B

    UFC Fight Night - Strickland vs Hall - Official discussion

    I mentioned TJ as a bet last event, and said the angle for Jordan/Gall was Jordan Ml and Gall hedge sub or just Gall sub if you didn’t like Jordan ML. Hope some cashed. That said, this card is garbage
  13. B

    UFC Fight Night - Strickland vs Hall - Official discussion

    I remember the same thing was said about Maia’s path could make him look -500 vs Belal and how did that turn out? In this betting game, assuming without evidence behind it to back it up is a risky game your playing.
  14. B

    UFC Fight Night - Sandhagen vs Dillashaw- Offical discussion

    I hear ya, TJ could definitely not look like the same TJ. Personally I would rather play the +180 side to find out than the -170 or -200 side. respect your opinion so may the best man win tonight. I am a big fan of Sand too and have bet him many times in the past, more or less have always have...
  15. B

    UFC Fight Night - Sandhagen vs Dillashaw- Offical discussion

    I have a hard time agreeing Jordan Ml is a hard pass at -165 when Sandhagen is a play at -170. I know different fights at etc, but I personally think Sandhagen at around -125 is more a play. -170 and def -200 is too high imo. How much are you actually putting into Tj looking slower at age 35...
  16. B

    UFC Fight Night - Sandhagen vs Dillashaw- Offical discussion

    All the Jordan vs Gall talk, Jordan Ml and a small Gall sub hedge at +375 is the way to play that. Or just Gall sub if you don’t feel like playing Jordan Ml. Gall isn’t a round winner, and he is 1-2 in fights that go the distance. That one decision win was against Salim lol. I have a hard time...
  17. B

    UFC Fight Night - Sandhagen vs Dillashaw- Offical discussion

    Those weirdos do it because they charge people money for their picks, the better ROI the more buyers, which is hilarious and just tasteless when you are misleading potential buyers with your numbers. You don’t even charge for your picks so I believe your numbers and ROI, what reason do you have...
  18. B

    UFC Fight Night - Sandhagen vs Dillashaw- Offical discussion

    I know some that bet more than they show on their betting tips page, so I know first hand for sure ROI they show on that page is not a reflection of their real overall ROI. Not saying that’s the case with you, but that is the case with others. Then you got some like Jordan that had their first...
Back
Top