6 Ways To Improve Brain Health In Contact Sports Athlete's

SandaKicker

Green Belt
@Green
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
391


Hopefully this is cool me posting this here.

With so much media hype about CTE these days, the brain health of contact sports athlete's has received a lot of attention. In the UK they are restricting heading soccer balls for younger players and in the USA it's received a massive amount of media attention.

The discussion of a brain disease has seemingly become as critical a part of striking training as anything else.

There are some markers of brain health which are dependent on how a striker trains in the gym and how often they compete. There are some other markers of brain health which are dependent on lifestyle factors.

I made this video quoting from half a dozen medical experts and a dozen medical research studies which show there is a lot more for a healthy brain which can be done than seemingly the average person off the street thinks. In reality there are far more variables than training in a contact sport.
 
Interesting but I’m gonna need cliffs please
 
Interesting but I’m gonna need cliffs please

Cliffs I guess.

Study estimates that 50-70% of Alzheimer's risk is determined by controllable environmental factors. There are many scientists who reckon once all the research is done on CTE, it will be the same;

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306987704006000

Study shows that Obesity shrinks the brain 99.9% of the time. It's worth noting when they show brain shrinkage in the autopsy of contact sport athletes in the media that Obesity also shrinks the brain;

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hbm.22159

Stress also causes brain shrinkage;

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00401-013-1223-5

Study looks at how the brain regenerates brain cells after brain injury;

https://www.neurosurgery.theclinics.com/article/S1042-3680(06)00123-9/abstract

60 neurologists asking for a call for balance on CTE reporting;

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(19)30020-1/fulltext

If you want to read any of the studies that are behind a paywall head to sci hub;

https://twitter.com/scihub_love?lang=en
 
This is great to see. Thank you. I retired from professional football here in Canada, as a result of concussions. My neurologist and brain specialist recommended reading, meditating, exercise and managing my mental health as a great way to manage these issues. It's been six years since I've retired and my brain health appears to be great. I have returned to combat sports but do not spar, limit my wrestling, with a focus on pad work and my bjj.

Moving forward I hope more information like this becomes mainstream for young athletes.
 
@-dirtywhiteboy- , besides the additional reading, mediation, and exercising; has your diet change? And if so, have you notice any major improvement by switching up your diet? Thanks.
 
@-dirtywhiteboy- , besides the additional reading, mediation, and exercising; has your diet change? And if so, have you notice any major improvement by switching up your diet? Thanks.

I have switched up my diet. More greens and fruit. I avoid excess processed sugar and dairy. I supplement the hell out of gingko biloba, I've found that to be a big help. I recommend it.

I'm also a counselor in the mental health field so I've found consistantly learning has been a massive help. The need to examine challenges and find solutions has been so beneficial.
 
It's an interesting field for sure, and while I agree with the overaching points you make and it's a good video, there's some issues there as well. What's your degree in btw?
 
It's an interesting field for sure, and while I agree with the overaching points you make and it's a good video, there's some issues there as well. What's your degree in btw?

Medical science (I’m British) it’s a research focused degree
 
Medical science (I’m British) it’s a research focused degree
Yeah that makes sense, I think the car analogy somehow gave it away. Figured something in biochemistry or similar.
 
While hopefully not sounding too nitpicky, this is more of a professional critique. I think the main issue is not clearly distinguishing between late stage neurological degeneration and concussion or post concussion syndrome, as well as not making a distinction between degrees of TBIs. I know they are in similar category, but the complexity of the pathophysiology makes them somewhat dissimilar in actuality. Secondly I think it's important when dealing with laymen to really hammer home the message that correlation doesn't equal causation. Last thing is, and this is something I often take issue with when experts make conclusive statements as the one's presented by the scientists in the video, is that it's easy to cherrypick one, or two, or even five studies on a subject and reach a biased conclusions. I think there's a very dire lack of being critical about internal and external validity of much of the research and more importantly, not casting a wide enough net when examining the evidence. In my view, you need to evaluate the body of the literature before you can even begin to make tentative recommendations, and that's what I view good science as as well.
 
While hopefully not sounding too nitpicky, this is more of a professional critique. I think the main issue is not clearly distinguishing between late stage neurological degeneration and concussion or post concussion syndrome, as well as not making a distinction between degrees of TBIs. I know they are in similar category, but the complexity of the pathophysiology makes them somewhat dissimilar in actuality. Secondly I think it's important when dealing with laymen to really hammer home the message that correlation doesn't equal causation. Last thing is, and this is something I often take issue with when experts make conclusive statements as the one's presented by the scientists in the video, is that it's easy to cherrypick one, or two, or even five studies on a subject and reach a biased conclusions. I think there's a very dire lack of being critical about internal and external validity of much of the research and more importantly, not casting a wide enough net when examining the evidence. In my view, you need to evaluate the body of the literature before you can even begin to make tentative recommendations, and that's what I view good science as as well.
Could you explain in layman terms how the pathways of short term and long term brain damage differ? Also what are some of the differences in the treatment of short and long term trauma?
 
Also what are some of the differences in the treatment of short and long term trauma?
You by short term trauma mean for example head trauma in a bout or smoker?
I mean trauma that does require ring doctor do his job? Cos what they later will do in hospital is different stuff.
 
Last edited:
Could you explain in layman terms how the pathways of short term and long term brain damage differ? Also what are some of the differences in the treatment of short and long term trauma?
I can do my best, it's a bit complicated and there's a lot that researcher don't know, yet. There is some overlap between the two as well.

Basically, long term damage is late stage neurological degeneration. More akin to Alzheimers or Parkinson, with changes in brain metabolism, cerebral blood flow, brain atrophy and build up of plaque like the tau protein. This is where CTE would be. The environmental risk factors for developing this are mostly in line with the OP, as well a high volume of sustained (sub)concussive trauma over a long duration of years or decades.

Short term damage is concussive damage with immediate changes in brain metabolism, blood flow, autonomic function, mood, cognitive function and often accompanied by cervical pathology/whiplash syndrome. Roughly 10-15% will experience long term symptoms which is defined as post-concussion syndrome (PCS). This can become chronic and last for months or even years, and in some cases indefinitely. Environmental risk factors are not really well understood, however previous concussions and being female, as well as having had psychosocial difficulties prior to the initial trauma, may elevate risk. A concussion is classified as a mild traumatic brain injury, with moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries have similar but more severe injury mechanisms, often with macro damage to the brain akin to that of a stroke. This often results in an additional loss of cognition, sensory input and motor function.

In regards to the rehabilitation of long term damage like Alzheimers or CTE, compared to PCS, as I said initially there is an overlap there but the way in which the treatment is administered can be very different. Considering exercise and cognitive stimulation, for example. Exercise is good for both, as it normalises cerebral blood flow as well as autonomic regulation, however many PCS patients have what is called exercise intolerance. Any physical exertion makes them experience symptom exacerbation. Here you would have to use a very strict and sub-maximal aerobic protocol to improve exercise tolerance. In regards to cognitive stimulation, higher levels of cognitive activity can actually prolong the duration of recovery in PCS patients, which is seemingly not the case for late stage neurological degeneration. Which is why rest and activity has to be managed thoughfully, and it's here that stress reducing activities as well as meditation, mindfulness, stretching, breathing exercises or otherwise, come into play. This is applicable to both, I'd say. Stress is not good for the brain.

Anyway, that's a small example. I'm currently co-authoring a paper on PCS in physical therapy, but it's geared towards healthcare professionals and it's not completely encompassing. I'll have a thorough section on PCS pathology, risk factors and recovery strategies on my website when I finally get time to sit down and do it over the next few months. I will most likely be posting both here when it's done, for anyone who wants to read it.
 
Last edited:
While hopefully not sounding too nitpicky, this is more of a professional critique. I think the main issue is not clearly distinguishing between late stage neurological degeneration and concussion or post concussion syndrome, as well as not making a distinction between degrees of TBIs. I know they are in similar category, but the complexity of the pathophysiology makes them somewhat dissimilar in actuality

I see what you are saying.

It’s really a question of target audience in my opinion.

I think if a lot of people in the UFC discussion forum saw someone with post concussion syndrome they would call it CTE even though they are obviously completely different things.

If there was a goal of my video, I’d say it was to open people’s eyes that there is more to brain health than getting hit in the head playing sports and not playing sports because my perception is the average guy off the street thinks it’s that simple because of all the media coverage on CTE.
 
I see what you are saying.

It’s really a question of target audience in my opinion.

I think if a lot of people in the UFC discussion forum saw someone with post concussion syndrome they would call it CTE even though they are obviously completely different things.

If there was a goal of my video, I’d say it was to open people’s eyes that there is more to brain health than getting hit in the head playing sports and not playing sports because my perception is the average guy off the street thinks it’s that simple because of all the media coverage on CTE.
Yeah it makes sense, and it was a good video. Some useful information for sure! I would just generally advocate being sceptical of the sweeping conclusions many researchers portray in their presentations. Like the guy who said that the ketogenic diet is good for the brain but will give you a heart attack, yeah no. I dislike almost all diet "fads" and I don't personally advocate for any keto diet, but that's just not supported by any evidence. Claiming high fat diet necessarily equals a prolonged increase in serum lipids is pretty cringy. There's a lot of people like that out there always wanting to push their narrative, especially in the US.
 
It's very interesting to see where science is taking us regarding the effects of brain trauma & how to treat it. I'd love to be a case study but unfortunately, as my neurologist told me when I broached the subject with him last year, there's not much demand for case studies of healthy people.
But I'd still like to know why my experience is so much different from my peers who aren't as fortunate as I am regarding brain health after a lifetime of combat sports. I began training in Isshin-Ryu Karate at 13, Switched to Tae Kwon Do about three years later & then discovered boxing at 17.
Over the course of my career that followed, I had over 50 amateur & professional fights as a boxer, fought several exhibition bouts & I had a pro kickboxing bout. I was also very active as a sparring partner for many world champions & top contenders for a number of years. And my style was that of an aggressive walk-in banger so I wasn't the type of fighter who was particularly defensively sound. Which means I soaked up quite a bit of punishment over the years. But I was never knocked out or even TKO'd on my feet as I had an excellent chin & I was very durable. The only time that I was stopped inside the distance was when I was stopped on cuts twice & stopped due to excessive bleeding from my nose when it was broken in the Empire State Games quarterfinals match.
Anyhow, I had a long career with a lot of fights & I took a lot of blows but all my scans have come back perfect over the years since I retired. I show no signs whatsoever of any form of cognitive decline & I don't have any physical issues like poor balance, trembling, frequent headaches, etc.. The only reason that I see a neurologist is because all those years of using my neck as a shock absorber have wrecked a bit of havoc on it. I needed reconstructive surgery on it a few years ago to repair my cervical spine & some nerve damage. Other than that & some issues with my lower back as well I'm in good physical health.
Contrast that with two good friends of mine who I came up through the amateur boxing ranks with & the difference is dramatic. They're both only two years my senior & they both were recently entered into assisted living facilities suffering from Pugilistic Dementia. They both fought professionally as well but the only difference between their careers & mine is that they were both KO'd on a few occasions. But, there are many other retired fighters that have been KO'd several times as well but they're not in the same horrible shape as my two friends are.
So, I wonder what it is that separates me from them?
I'm hoping that one day soon science will come up with some answers. No matter if they're some complex theory or it's as simple as my exceptionally hard head.
 
Back
Top