Chinese virus from a Wuhan laboratory?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 159002
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 159002

Guest
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/co...pete-us-sources.amp?__twitter_impression=true

There is increasing confidence that COVID-19 likely originated in a Wuhan laboratory not as a bioweapon, but as part of China's effort to demonstrate that its efforts to identify and combat viruses are equal to or greater than the capabilities of the United States, multiple sources who have been briefed on the details of early actions by China's government and seen relevant materials tell Fox News.

This may be the "costliest government coverup of all time," one of the sources said.

The sources believe the initial transmission of the virus was bat-to-human, and that "patient zero" worked at the laboratory, then went into the population in Wuhan.
Click to expand...

We shall see. Do you believe the original story, that it came from the wet markets? Or do you think that's a coverup story?
 
Honestly both stories are pretty plausible. Their government is so opaque it is easy to believe the cover-up theory. The wet market theory is "palatable" as well. It almost feels like a coin flip as far as trying to choose between the two.
 
Take this conspiracy bullshit to the great beyond psycho
 
But I thought Bill Gates created this in his kitchen while he was installing 5G networks.
 
yeah, read that. So it was started by China trying show they were superior then covering up the screw up, both times it's all about FACE.

How can you expect transparency post the screw up when it was all started by an attempt to obscure transparency by deceiving (trying to look like something they're not)?

Once a crook always a crook
 
It will behoove anyone in that lab to cover it up because the penalty for a major fuck up in China is death
 
Looks like this story is gaining traction in news outlets on both sides of the aisle.

Was it made to be a bioweapon? No.

Was it part of a program to help Chinese labs to be able to identify, isolate, and cure a spectrum of coronaviruses? Possibly

Was the safety and security of the facility a concern? It looks that way.

This raised enough red flags that State wrote a cable to try to get DC attention.
 
sabretruth said:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/co...pete-us-sources.amp?__twitter_impression=true



We shall see. Do you believe the original story, that it came from the wet markets? Or do you think that's a coverup story?
Click to expand...

This was a few weeks ago so it may be outdated already, we'll see what the consensus is when this is all over.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/03/200326144357.htm

Using comparative analysis of genomic data, the scientists show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.

Professor Holmes said: "There is simply no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 -- the cause of COVID-19 -- came out of a lab. In reality, this is the sort of natural disease emergence event that researchers in the field like myself have been warning about for many years."
 
sabretruth said:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/co...pete-us-sources.amp?__twitter_impression=true



We shall see. Do you believe the original story, that it came from the wet markets? Or do you think that's a coverup story?
Click to expand...
From the UK government's COBRA committe.

Wuhan lab virus leak ‘no longer discounted’: Cobra

Latest UK intelligence suggests there is a credible alternative view to the theory that the virus came from animals

NOTE: The UK government committe does not say the virus came from the lab, what it does say is that it can't be ruled as escaping from the lab. This is a significant change in thinking because originally , for months, the consensus was that the virus came out of the seafood wet-market in Wuhan

-
While “the balance of scientific advice” is still that the deadly coronavirus was first transmitted to humans from a live animal market in Wuhan, a leak from a laboratory in the Chinese city is “no longer being discounted” by UK ministers, according to a report in The Mail on Sunday.

One member of Cobra, the emergency committee led by Boris Johnson, said that while the latest intelligence did not dispute the virus was “zoonotic” – originating in animals – it did not rule out that the virus first spread to humans after leaking from a Wuhan laboratory, the report said.

The member of Cobra, which receives classified briefings from the security services, said: “There is a credible alternative view [to the zoonotic theory] based on the nature of the virus. Perhaps it is no coincidence that there is that laboratory in Wuhan. It is not discounted.”
-

https://asiatimes.com/2020/04/wuhan-lab-virus-leak-no-longer-discounted-cobra/
 
So many silly replies for a serious issue.
 
Voodoo_Child906 said:
This was a few weeks ago so it may be outdated already, we'll see what the consensus is when this is all over.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/03/200326144357.htm

Using comparative analysis of genomic data, the scientists show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.

Professor Holmes said: "There is simply no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 -- the cause of COVID-19 -- came out of a lab. In reality, this is the sort of natural disease emergence event that researchers in the field like myself have been warning about for many years."
Click to expand...
It may have escaped from the lab and still be a natural development, not a man-made virus.

Possible options:

a) virus originates in bats, especially the horseshoe bats found in Yunnan province. Virus jumps to another species, possibly a pangolin. At the Wuhan market, the virus jumps from the Pangolin to patient zero
b) Patient zero brings the virus into the Seafood market, and starts the outbreak
c) Virus originates in Asian Pangolin and jumps to humans at the Wuhan market
d) Researchers at one of the 2 virology labs in Wuhan are studying the virus, and the virus infects a researcher unbeknownst to staff.
e) Researchers at one of the 2 labs , while studying and experimenting with the virus introduce a process or organic matter to the virus which allows it mutates. Unbeknownst to the staff the virus infects a researcher and esacpes.
-

Shi Zhengli , affectionately referred to as China's batwoman, is famous for studying coronaviruses in bats, first wondered if the virus had escaped from her lab. Because she found a remarkable similarity between this virus and coronavirus in Yunnan horseshoe bats. She was skeptical of the Wuhan seafood market theory because these horseshoe bats are not found in that area. She looked at her notes to see if the SARS-Cov-2 virus matched the genome of the viruses she studied and was relieved to find it didn't . But there is another virology lab in Wuhan that was also studying bats and viruses.
 
Last edited:
Lowiqredneck said:
Honestly both stories are pretty plausible. Their government is so opaque it is easy to believe the cover-up theory. The wet market theory is "palatable" as well. It almost feels like a coin flip as far as trying to choose between the two.
Click to expand...

I find it interesting that they have allowed the Wet Markets to start back up. Weird, right? Almost like they don't care because they know that's not where it originated
 
SBJJ said:
I find it interesting that they have allowed the Wet Markets to start back up. Weird, right? Almost like they don't care because they know that's not where it originated
Click to expand...
News I read say the wet-markets have started back up, but they are not selling wild animals.

Wet-markets aren't really the problem, the problem is selling exotic species, live animals and wild species all alongside each other in inhumane unhygenic conditions. The inhuman conditions matter because when animals are stressed their immune systems are compromised. The inhumane conditions also correlate with unhygenic conditons.
 
I think those posters who belittled those who said this was not only a possibility but a probability will never admit they were wrong.

No matter what, those posters will say it's a stupid CT. All the while not realizing they were the ones believing a CT drummed up by the CCP and their allies at the WHO and scientific community
 
I think thats the most likely source of this, I dont see why some find it so outrageous of a claim?
 
I thought we had like 3 of these conspiracy threads merged already.

Maybe it was robots
Or 5g birds
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,661
Messages
55,432,562
Members
174,775
Latest member
kilgorevontrouty

Share this page

Back
Top