- Joined
- May 6, 2008
- Messages
- 61,018
- Reaction score
- 22,579
More dangerous CRT
It's probably going to take a while, but eventually you guys are going to understand that isn't CRT.
I guess the important question is: Do you guys care what CRT is?
More dangerous CRT
I don't care much for the differences between the strict academic definition of CRT and woke identity politics that borrow ideas from it.It's probably going to take a while, but eventually you guys are going to understand that isn't CRT.
I guess the important question is: Do you guys care what CRT is?
I don't care much for the differences between the strict academic definition of CRT and woke identity politics that borrow ideas from it.
Loiosh + CRT threads = comedy gold.
Meh the definition of CRT was never really clear to begin with. What do you suggest they call it instead?You really should.
Laws are being created, definitions matter.
Meh the definition of CRT was never really clear to begin with. What do you suggest they call it instead?
I think the whole thing is racist
I believe they have defined it as CRT. And I've already said I'm okay with that because this woke garbage (and thats what it is) uses ideas from CRT.They're creating laws to ban something that they haven't defined, don't you think that's a problem?
LOL at it being the truth. Most of the shit I see that is getting exposed is insanity. I hope teachers are getting scared. They should stick with the history book and leave their own personal opinions out it.They're trying to scare teachers away from teaching the truth, which is why when polled a majority of students in the south said the civil war was fought over states rights.
I believe they have defined it as CRT. And I've already said I'm okay with that because this woke garbage (and thats what it is) uses ideas from CRT.
LOL at it being the truth. Most of the shit I see that is getting exposed is insanity. I hope teachers are getting scared. They should stick with the history book and leave their own personal opinions out it.
I have mixed feelings, on one hand it would be nice to have full definitions. However, one of the problems you run into is these wacko teachers are already looking for ways to get around the bans - CRT Mega Thread Vol.1. So I'm not sure if its better or not to keep things vague. Maybe its better to not let them know exactly how far they can go before crossing the line.CRT is a name, not a definition. If there are laws banning it, there has to be a specific definition. Agree or disagree?
Thats just an opinion. I don't see it as controversial. I'm assuming the classrooms are still teaching about slavery.As for truth, you're being led down a dark road. I mentioned the poll, are you OK with that?
This is what gets said every time something new comes up and the problems keep escalating. You're okay with revolutionary commies hanging Mao posters and crazy Karens telling kids to pledge alliance to the Pride flag?Conservative media is selling you on the outliers and you're buying that it's a nationwide problem. They sold "CRT" by having conservatives operatives put on performance pieces at school meetings, recording and broadcasting them. You're OK with legislation being driven by performances and extreme outliers?
noIt's probably going to take a while, but eventually you guys are going to understand that isn't CRT.
I guess the important question is: Do you guys care what CRT is?
I have mixed feelings, on one hand it would be nice to have full definitions. However, one of the problems you run into is these wacko teachers are already looking for ways to get around the bans - CRT Mega Thread Vol.1. So I'm not sure if its better or not to keep things vague. Maybe its better to not let them know exactly how far they can go before crossing the line.
Thats just an opinion. I don't see it as controversial. I'm assuming the classrooms are still teaching about slavery.
This is what gets said every time something new comes up and the problems keep escalating. You're okay with revolutionary commies hanging Mao posters and crazy Karens telling kids to pledge alliance to the Pride flag?
As long as tax payers are funding public schools, legislation is fair game.Parents should be involved in their children's education and if there are any concerns with the curriculum, they should be addressed on a school by school basis. The answer shouldn't be undefined blanket bans across the state.
Sure it is. Many historians have debated this. I actually had a professor in college that thought it was about state's rights too (and I'm pretty sure she was a lesbian).Except it isn't just an opinion.
I just googled it. It sounds like its a reaction to that awful 1619 project grift. I'm not really interested in diving deep into it but it doesn't sound like its trying to "falsify history".Actual legislation is being enacted to falsify history, and did you take a look at the 1776 Project?
More dangerous CRT
Virtue signaling is part of the religion of woke. It makes it easy to expose them.I'm just glad the dangers of CRT and it's horrible teachings are being exposed, at least somewhat. Intolerance of others and special treatment based on skin color shouldn't be taught in schools.
Virtue signaling is part of the religion of woke. It makes it easy to expose them.
My sisters already been indoctrinated at her uni. Impressionable youth fallen for it hook line and sinker. Keeps describing so and so as a "white boy". I'm just like ffs why use a racial slur against your own race? But of course describing adult males as "white boys" isn't racist to CRTers.