Elections Democrat insurrectionists question primary results in NYC after 135k test ballots counted

cottagecheesefan

Steel Belt
@Steel
Joined
Apr 3, 2002
Messages
30,247
Reaction score
28,344
More in the saga of most secure elections ever in the history of the universe.







In addition, they also are finding more ballots cast than actual voters.



Further, the board of elections removes the poll watchers who founds these over votes, rather than commenting on the issue

“We have discovered discrepancies that raise concerns and deserve further exploration,” the report continued. “These were reported to the coordinators at each poll site and directly to the Board of Elections. The Board of Elections responded by removing our project leader as a poll watcher and changing the information our poll watchers were allowed to view. Now we cannot collect the data necessary for the successful completion of the project.”

All interesting since there are ongoing civil cases against the NYC board of elections, as they have a reputation of being incompetent and having corrupt poll workers who feed ballots into the scanners.



“We chose the 45th City Council District, partly because there is an ongoing civil court case here alleging corruption and poll workers ‘fraudulently feeding ballots into the scanner.’ We are not making those allegations, or taking a position on them. We are simply aware that allegations are moving forward in the courts, and they indicate that there is some lack of confidence in the process.”
 
Bamboo fibers would be my guess. Who let you out of the AZ audit thread?
 
Back
Top