Social "Fighters Against Socialism" Jorge Masvidal leading charge for better fighter pay

WOW...just WOW.

He is literally arguing for the workers to have more control of the means of production while advocating for capitalism.....

He doesn't understand that capitalism is where the owners get rich while the workers build and produce everything.....just amazing.

He's taken one too many shots to the head.
 
Naaa I dont care what another man makes let alone another rich man. To me it is cucked to care so much for what another already superior and famous man than yourself makes

The UFC subforum is a funny place I promise you most of the guys posting there have low paying jobs, are out of shape yet they argue so hard for someone they dont know to make more $$$ yet they wont argue for themselves to make more money $. Half of then are also "anti Socialist Trump supporters" so it is even funnier to see them advocate for fighter pay increases in a socialist manner yet they wont use those tactics for jobs that really matter...

So bizzare

You got people saying Poirier and Conor deserve even more money and it just screams of being cucked. It is like almost as bad as donating $100 or $20 to an already Rich man (Trump) but at least if you agree with Trumps politicial ideology then him having more $$$ to influence politics can work to your advantage if you feel his policies help you

Yet an MMA fighter will never do anything of real value for your life and yet we got half of this entire forum of losers whinning about fighter pay. So cucked

So simp like
Well it's not bizarre in other sports. Like the NBA and NFL who split around 50-50. Just look at what top boxers make compared to top UFC fighters. Conor is an anomaly and coddled. Most fighters have few rights and are subject to retaliation.
 
Well it's not bizarre in other sports. Like the NBA and NFL who split around 50-50. Just look at what top boxers make compared to top UFC fighters. Conor is an anomaly and coddled. Most fighters have few rights and are subject to retaliation.

I dont care I want everyone to be payed less and maintain it is the male version of simping to be so concerned about these men pay you dont know
 
I dont care I want everyone to be payed less and maintain it is the male version of simping to be so concerned about these men pay you dont know
I'm concerned about the fighters on the lower end of the pay scale and that includes most of the female fighters.
 
Something capitalists spend lots of money to convince workers to be against.
I think my favorite part is how those same “conservatives” that are anti union are always against the least amount of regulations and laws… until it comes to poor people trying to use collective bargaining to get their fair share. The law is their to protect those poor little conglomerates from Big Union.
 
It's not even near the highest. The top ten states with the highest levels of people living in poverty are, according to the U.S. government's own stats, as of 2019:

Tennessee, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, West Virginia, New Mexico, Louisiana, Mississippi. California looks to be just about right in the middle, 24th or 25th.

https://data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?ID=17826#Pe0aa821e1eb44f96b05a16756cc127ee_2_229iT3
<{anton}>
He won’t let the truth change his mind though
 
Ah yes, supporting these two clowns is a bulletproof way of increasing worker pay:

images
 
If unions weren't good for workers, the Jeff Bezoses of the world wouldn't put so much effort into keeping their workers from unionizing.

Those dastardly Conservative Bezoses
 
Of course the state with the most people is going to have the most poor people. Do you think you're proving something here?

You have no clue.

CA has the steepest income inequality. It's basically becoming Mexico. Uber Rich on the coasts. Everyone else barely getting by.
 
If unions weren't good for workers, the Jeff Bezoses of the world wouldn't put so much effort into keeping their workers from unionizing.

Hehe.
Amazon is in Sweden and they tried the usual stuff.
A engineer working for Amazon broke his leg at work, during his sick leave Amazon fired him.
Amazon got to meet the Swedish Unions.... Lets just say Amazon did not win that fight.
 
You have no clue.

CA has the steepest income inequality. It's basically becoming Mexico. Uber Rich on the coasts. Everyone else barely getting by.
Plenty of people are barely getting by everywhere.
 
Hehe.
Amazon is in Sweden and they tried the usual stuff.
A engineer working for Amazon broke his leg at work, during his sick leave Amazon fired him.
Amazon got to meet the Swedish Unions.... Lets just say Amazon did not win that fight.
What's Sweden's policy on refugees from The U.S.? I always say, the best trick capitalism ever pulled off was convincing the poor and middle classes that simply existing and functioning in a capitalistic system makes one a capitalist.
 
scjm13.png


Jorge Masvidal hopes more people bring attention to fighter pay ‘because I think it’s messed up’

https://www.mmafighting.com/2021/9/...-to-fighter-pay-because-i-think-its-messed-up

Jorge Masvidal said he was “leading the charge” for better fighter pay in the UFC. But these days, he’s just not quite sure how 600-some independent contractors get together to make that happen...“Fighters are very individual creatures,” Masvidal said recently on The MMA Hour. “We’d have to come together under a roof, or something like that, and have each other’s best interests at heart, so we could sit down with everybody together. And that, in itself, is a problem.

Masvidal has said his mission is to get fighters their fair share of the revenue produced by their work in the octagon. According to court documents brought to in an anti-trust case against the UFC, the promotion expects to pay no more than 20 percent of that revenue to the fighters. “Gamebred” cited a recent Twitter graphic that put it at 16 percent, the share that went to fighters in 2012, according to internal projections made public through the lawsuit.

Masvidal believes things will change one day...he’s not sure what will be the catalyst.


The catalyst will be when it starts trickling down, Jorge. Just be patient.
<36>
He's a typical thug Miami moron. I follow his dumb ass on Instagram and his posts are becoming increasingly asinine. The latest I saw was him going apoplectic over Cuba doing mass immunizations of children. Of all the things to get mad with the Cuban government over, that's what this idiot picks. There were lots of other moron fighters chiming in as well. A lot of whom I want to like but they're making it hard for me these days as someone who's based in logic and reality and not low IQ conspiratorial thinking.
 
Now, In Jorge's defense, his hot take was at least better than Sam Alvey's was:

"I'm strongly against the unions. I've said it before. The unions want to pay everybody the same amount, and I don't support that. Conor McGregor earned his multi-millions by the way he runs his mouth and the way he wins. As much as I'm not a fan of his, I'm with that. With a union, he wouldn't be worth that. He wouldn't get half of what he's asking. Now for some of the guys that don't stand out like him, I think a union could do well. But I think that they are taking something from someone that has earned it. Myself, I don't want it, because I think I'm going to be worth every penny of what Conor is. I just need to get that win streak going and run my mouth a little bit. With a union like that I just don't like it. I'm worth more than some of the other fighters. As bad as that sounds, I am."

He's 0-6-1 in his last 7 fights and looks like he was making about $65,000 a fight in recent fights.
Fucking pendejo. Because in every sport with a union, athletes get paid exactly the same. LeBron James and the guy riding the Lakers' bench? Exactly the same money. Michael Jordan and Luc Longley back in the 90s? Same money. That's socialism, bro!

{<doc}
 
Back
Top