Ah, I see. First you change your argument mid-debate because you sounded like a moron, and now you are creating a strawman to argue against. Being a fan of Gordon is completely irrelevant and you admitted yourself he is the best at what he does. You are trying to make that the topic when it isn't. No-gi is more pure, because there are less rules. It's just straight grappling and trying to finish someone. That's as pure as it gets besides adding in strikes. You want everything to be weighed equally when it simply isn't. Take away all the restrictions and just let guys go, Gordon comes out on top; straight fact. That isn't because anyone is hanging off his nuts, it's because he is the best at the most free form of grappling we have.
This is like arguing that sport TKD is as good as MMA as a martial art because they have different rule sets and someone can be the best at sport TKD so he is equal to Miocic or whoever is the current champ at whatever weight class, when the reality is MMA if better for fighting and no-gi is better for grappling. The more rules you remove, the more bs nonsense you takeaway, the closer you get to the truth of fighting/grappling.