there are plenty of sources of money for things like this that don’t completely rely on government spending. Bezo’s wife would be a source for example, as would other obscenely rich people and companies. We need to do something about the addiction levels, do you agree on that?
So we just take money from other people... not you of course, but others?
I'm shocked...
I didn’t say take it away from them. Let them donate and put their money where their mouth is
...and if they don't? Obviously, they haven't so far so where is the money for your little socialist utopia coming from?
first time in my life I have ever been accused of being socialist. Hilarious. I am saying wherever the money comes from we need more funding for inpatient treatment for addicts or things continue to get worse. It needs to happen
Oh, well if you know a guy
You don’t even know what my opinion is on it. Your basing an opinion an making an argument against a whole group of people based on you anecdote about one single person.If you have an idea on the majority of my tax dollars wont go toward feeding a drug users habit, I'd be all ears.
The reality of homelessness and what your propaganda tells you homelessness is are two completely different things.
You don’t even know what my opinion is on it. Your basing an opinion an making an argument against a whole group of people based on you anecdote about one single person.
Somewhat ironically you’re accusing me of buying into propaganda while your anecdote sounds like generic republican outrage propaganda.
I’m not getting mad. Just pointing out the massive glaring flaw in your reasoning.No, I'm basing an argument on what the reality of the situation is and I gave one example of it. My anecdote is a situation a family member got herself into recently with a guy.
You getting mad that I don't want to give my money toward housing drug addicts is all I need to know about your opinion.
"It needs to happen"
Define needs to? You mean you'd "like" it to happen?
In life, there will always be winners and losers. Nothing you can do will change that.
...and I didn't call you a socialist, I called your proposal.
I’m not getting mad. Just pointing out the massive glaring flaw in your reasoning.
All you need to know about my opinion? Guess what goober, I actually don’t think there is much we can do about it and don’t support some massive public housing project. I just have much better reasons than “I know this one guy”. Your money. Man some of you guys got the biggest victim complexs.
Obtuse about what? I’m trying to teach you a life lesson about making assumptions here. You didn’t explain shit. You just stated that this is a is reality. You aren’t basing it on anything other than your one example. Seeing as how you jumped to conclusions about my stance on it right away I have no reason to believe you have ever given any of this any real thought. No, you watched some right wing propaganda. That’s really where your opinions come from and we both know it.Now you're just being purposely obtuse. I just explained myself in the last post and you're doubling down on your initial assumption that is wrong. Not sure what to tell you at this point other than enjoy your strawman. When you grow up, get back to me and we can continue this.
Obtuse about what? I’m trying to teach you a life lesson about making assumptions here. You didn’t explain shit. You just stated that this is a is reality. You aren’t basing it on anything other than your one example. Seeing as how you jumped to conclusions about my stance on it right away I have no reason to believe you have ever given any of this any real thought. No, you watched some right wing propaganda. That’s really where your opinions come from and we both know it.
I don't know what exactly the girl holding this sign is trying to say. That if you can't pay for housing, other people or the government are morally obligated to pay your rent?
How many libs in this forum actually believe this?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ounce-new-eviction-moratorium-after-criticism
We shouldn't deny public funded or subsidized housing to homeless people based the % of homeless that will trash the place. Just as we shouldn't deny benefits to struggling people based on the % who abuse the system.Oh man, this is a conflicting issue for me. I did homeless outreach for a few years and I will tell you that being homeless is tough and I don’t wish that on anyone. I believe that housing should be a right but there are those that are currently homeless that simply could not exist in any type of living environment. They would tear the place up, not pay rent, and break any and all rules because of mental illness and addiction issues.
The question isn’t that housing is or is not a right but how do we pay for it and continue to pay for it for those that can exist in housing?
No, not “I want to” it needs to happen. We do not have nearly enough treatment centers or beds for inpatient treatment. We spend billions on unneeded shit but this is needed