Social Hunter Biden dodged questions about his laptop.

[Darkballs]

I’m not going to bother anymore.

You bumped the thread and tagged me numbnuts.

Christ kid, the only thing I've asked you is: why did you post a year old article and what do you think it proves? For about half a dozen posts, that simple question has remained impossible for you to answer.

 

[ElKarlo]

You bumped the thread and tagged me numbnuts.

Christ kid, the only thing I've asked you is: why did you post a year old article and what do you think it proves? For about half a dozen posts, that simple question has remained impossible for you to answer.

I told you already. I posted it while on my phone and can’t edit. I also posted recent articles that you ignore and or dismiss

I do like your reasoning. Don’t believe Rudy. As if that had anything to do with Hunter flying to China in air force 2 to set up a Henry’s fund. Or him getting appointed to a board in Ukraine for a job he had no skills in and in a language he doesn’t speak. Guess there was no mask e trail of bread crumbs. Still glad I tagged you, you resorted to the age old implausible deniability the left is all about

 

[Darkballs]

Still glad I tagged you, you resorted to the age old implausible deniability the left is all about

I just asked what your argument is and you still can't state it.

That's not plausible deniability. That's very plainly asking you over and over again what the hell you are talking about and having you just move on to a the next slew of topics with no real opinion of your own. You still can't explain what the first posts of yours were even supposed to prove.

Again, you dumped: 1) One article citing the fbi that russia wasn't behind it, with no context of your own or what you think it proves; 2) an retraction on NPR, with no context of your own or what you think that proves; 3) an article about an upcoming book citing a Ukrainian who exchanged emails with Hunter, with no context of your own or any indiction what you think it proves; and finally, this wall of shit:

As if that had anything to do with Hunter flying to China in air force 2 to set up a Henry’s fund. Or him getting appointed to a board in Ukraine for a job he had no skills in and in a language he doesn’t speak. Guess there was no mask e trail of bread crumbs.

Can you not see how all over the place you are? Can you not see that you haven't structured a single coherent argument for me to work with here?

I agree. If you have no words of your own to add, and just want to tag me next ot a year old article that contains nothing new (as it's a fucking year old), and are just going to categorically refuse to offer a reason as to why you linked it, then yeah, don't bother tagging me.

 

[ElKarlo]

I just asked what your argument is and you still can't state it.

That's not plausible deniability. That's very plainly asking you over and over again what the hell you are talking about and having you just move on to a the next slew of topics with no real opinion of your own. You still can't explain what the first posts of yours were even supposed to prove.

Again, you dumped: 1) One article citing the fbi that russia wasn't behind it, with no context of your own or what you think it proves; 2) an retraction on NPR, with no context of your own or what you think that proves; 3) an article about an upcoming book citing a Ukrainian who exchanged emails with Hunter, with no context of your own or any indiction what you think it proves; and finally, this wall of shit:




Can you not see how all over the place you are? Can you not see that you haven't structured a single coherent argument for me to work with here?

I agree. If you have no words of your own to add, and just want to tag me next ot a year old article that contains nothing new (as it's a fucking year old), and are just going to categorically refuse to offer a reason as to why you linked it, then yeah, don't bother tagging me.

What? Your argument isn’t anything. It’s just dodging and pretending things didn’t happen. There’s piles of evidence. But that’s not what you’re arguing here and we both know it. Typical and awful of you

 

[ElKarlo]

WTF is wrong with you?

Is that prefect? Look at the rittenhouse thread. Dude is out of his mind

 

[Mr Holmes]

There is nothing wrong with pointing out Trumpers who are fetishly in love with a laptop full of dick pics.

It would appear you're the one obsessed with dick pics.

 

[terrapin]

I am not sure how accurate it is. It was on 4chan and even the NYP stated there was CP on it.
Iirc his underage niece was pictured topless or he was nude under his robe on a bed. Not sure the details but one or both was in a state of undress and they were close to each other on a bed.

If you are not sure how accurate it is you should not say it that's slander and bearing false witness. basically it's lying.

4chan is not a news source.

 

[High Test With da Best]

One would think but then again Yuri introduced us to a generation of Clifford Harris. Brainwashed, demoralized children who wouldn’t believe anything until a boot kicks them in the pussy…

I misread "kicks" as "licks" and was about to bust a rib laughing..."like, licks with it's tongue?"

Still funny though

 

[ElKarlo]

If you are not sure how accurate it is you should not say it that's slander and bearing false witness. basically it's lying.

4chan is not a news source.

I said allegedly

alsohttps://thespectator.info/2020/10/2...xposed-with-certain-minor-joe-biden-is-lying/
https://trendingpolitics.com/report...-child-endangerment-with-minor-family-member/

So apparently he was seen with his 14 year old niece who was topless. Take that for what you will.

 

[ElKarlo]

It would appear you're the one obsessed with dick pics.

Oh he does play himself, more than what would be considered healthy

 

[Prefect]

It would appear you're the one obsessed with dick pics.

I would have started the thread but a Trumper beat me to it.

Biden hate + Dick Love > Dick Love.

 

[HARRISON_3]

Uranium One > Hunter Biden

 

[Darkballs]

What? Your argument isn’t anything.

My argument? You bumped the thread buddy. Now the question remains, what the fuck was I supposed to respond to? The year old article that cites FBI officials that you say can't be trusted? The six-month old NPR retraction? The article about the book that hasn't been released?

Any time I ask you why you posted either article, you just yell an insult run away. So do you want to actually give us an argument to respond to?

 

[Mr Holmes]

My argument? You bumped the thread buddy. Now the question remains, what the fuck was I supposed to respond to? The year old article that cites FBI officials that you say can't be trusted? The six-month old NPR retraction? The article about the book that hasn't been released?

Any time I ask you why you posted either article, you just yell an insult run away. So do you want to actually give us an argument to respond to?

Its a recent update. A Politico journalist verified some of the emails were authentic.

 

[Darkballs]

Its a recent update. A Politico journalist verified some of the emails were authentic.

Yes. As discussed earlier, this recent update is in regards to an upcoming book in which a Politico reporter talks to a former businessman who worked with Hunter. That businessman states that two emails he sent to Hunter, are authentic. Both of these emails are ones that say essentially, from the guy to Hunter, "Thank you for the meeting with your dad," (both emails are quoted in the article if you need it word-for-word) These emails have been discussed before, and everyone pointed out that a businessman emaiingl Hunter thanking him does not prove that the meeting was nefarious, nor illegal, nor does this Ukrainian expound upon these emails having any further meaning other than "Thanks." These two emails don't even relate to the supposed Hunter dropped his laptop off in Delaware and forgot CT, which this thread was originally about.

So I'll put the same question to you: What do you think this book's claims prove?

 

[andnowweknow]

Yes. As discussed earlier, this recent update is in regards to an upcoming book in which a Politico reporter talks to a former businessman who worked with Hunter. That businessman states that two emails he sent to Hunter, are authentic. Both of these emails are ones that say essentially, from the guy to Hunter, "Thank you for the meeting with your dad," (both emails are quoted in the article if you need it word-for-word) These emails have been discussed before, and everyone pointed out that a businessman emaiingl Hunter thanking him does not prove that the meeting was nefarious, nor illegal, nor does this Ukrainian expound upon these emails having any further meaning other than "Thanks." These two emails don't even relate to the supposed Hunter dropped his laptop off in Delaware and forgot CT, which this thread was originally about.

So I'll put the same question to you: What do you think this book's claims prove?

They just lament the fact that unvetted info wasn't able to be used to slime the Biden's pre election. Didn't Rudy have this stuff for like a year before the election?

This email fetish is just more sour grapes from Corpse Biden pushing the fat orange one's poo in at the ballot box. If these people wanted to be constructive, they'd stop blaming the media for the terrible presidency of Trump.

 

[Darkballs]

They just lament the fact that unvetted info wasn't able to be used to slime the Biden's pre election. Didn't Rudy have this stuff for like a year before the election?

Yep. Rudy has had access to this information for over a year. But for some reason, neither him nor the shop owner have stepped up and just said what they saw. Either one of them could step in front of cameras tomorrow and say, "I read and email from Hunter to X that said.........". Or better yet, they could have just made copies.

There is nothing whatsoever preventing anyone who saw the contents of this laptop to go in front of the media tonight and tell us everything. Yet they haven't. Not for an entire year. And none of the trumpers find that suspicious. None of them find it odd that recently disbarred Giulliani hasn't just said what he saw.

 

[Mr Holmes]

Yes. As discussed earlier, this recent update is in regards to an upcoming book in which a Politico reporter talks to a former businessman who worked with Hunter. That businessman states that two emails he sent to Hunter, are authentic. Both of these emails are ones that say essentially, from the guy to Hunter, "Thank you for the meeting with your dad," (both emails are quoted in the article if you need it word-for-word) These emails have been discussed before, and everyone pointed out that a businessman emaiingl Hunter thanking him does not prove that the meeting was nefarious, nor illegal, nor does this Ukrainian expound upon these emails having any further meaning other than "Thanks." These two emails don't even relate to the supposed Hunter dropped his laptop off in Delaware and forgot CT, which this thread was originally about.

So I'll put the same question to you: What do you think this book's claims prove?

It shows the claim of Russian disinformation claim isn't as cut and dry as the democrats and media made it out to be.
Also shows Joe lied about not being involved he his son's business. Which makes it more plausible that he strong armed Ukraine for corrupt reasons.

 

[Tairy Hesticles]

Not sure why I am getting quoted I have always said Hunter was a Junkie but not running for President.
Some of you Trump guys constantly think I am some huge Biden fan and a socialist because I give Trump shit for being a snake oil salesman.
I like balanced budgets but the last 3 Presidents and the 4th including this one spends like a sailor on shore leave.

As a drunken sailor about to go on shore leave in 2 months, I greatly resent your statement. Once I get back home and sift through all of the Amazon boxes I have saved in my "order when home" list, and once I get them all situated in the new house I'm buying on leave, and once I marry my fiancé and return from my two week Caribbean honeymoon, I am going to give you a piece of my mind, Sir.

 

[Darkballs]

It shows the claim of Russian disinformation claim isn't as cut and dry as the democrats and media made it out to be.

No, it shows that the Hunter traveled to Delaware and left his laptop CT was not a story concocted by russians. Now I can't remember any prominent democrat, nor any MSM source making that claim. They were all ver clear, that these allegations were coming from a computer shop owner being represented by Rudy Giulliani.

Now most of the media dismissed the claims as dumb as fuck, but I don't recall a genuine push to blame the story on the russians. Do you have a link to any media source making that claim?

Also shows Joe lied about not being involved he his son's business. Which makes it more plausible that he strong armed Ukraine for corrupt reasons.

It most certainly fucking doesn't.

It's a Ukrainian businessman who used to work with Hunter confirming that HE penned Hunter an email saying "Thanks for the meeting with your dad." That's it.

So how do you get from that to, it proves Joe lied about his involvement in Hunters business? If I pen you a PM right now saying "I saw you fuck a dog," and then later confirm, as this Politico story does, that indeed, that PM is authentic, would that somehow prove you fucked said dog?

So in your own words, explain to me how you extrapolate from that email that Joe was lying.