Mike Tyson vs Alexander Karelin in the UFC. The ultimate striker vs grappler fight.

Chuck Rock

Blue Belt
Banned
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
692
Reaction score
0
Who takes it?

The most dominant greco roman wrestler of alltime vs one of the most feared strikers of alltime. Both heavyweights.

[YT]7agMuy63-50[/YT]


[YT]P9MDNMIbwOE[/YT]



In their prime, who wins an MMA bout and how?
 
oh boy.. i think it's easier to judge round 1 of GSP-Hendricks than this
 
Does Tyson take the fight seriously and actually train some TDD?
 
Karelin via low single and subsequent GnP.
 
Wrestling will almost always prevail against boxing IMO. If you are not properly trained, takedowns are not easy to stuff, and boxers have to get close to land.

Even the kickboxers in UFC that do well typically have a solid takedown defense. A straight boxer would always lose IMO, even if the wrestler couldn't strike.
 
Karelin via ragdoll.

Inb4 wasteland.
 
Tyson no doubt, Karelin lost to rulon Gardner for gods sake, what would the baddest man alive have done to him. Remember, he bites too
 
Wasteland via spinning titty twister
 
It would be like Royce vs Jimmerson in ufc 1, but more sloppy and a crappier sub.
 
Karelin wins if he wrestles. Tyson is bat shit crazy though. You cant train for crazy.
 
Imagine Don King and Dana White promoting this?
 
Tyson no doubt, Karelin lost to rulon Gardner for gods sake, what would the baddest man alive have done to him. Remember, he bites too

Tyson lost to Kevin McBride and Danny Williams.
 
Karelin via ragdoll.

Inb4 wasteland.

This if he can get close.. its over. If you just threw them in a ring its hard to tell but if each were trained a bit... Karelin.
 
1395289909359.gif
 
Back
Top