since you rubes are incapable, and it doesnt fit your agenda, i will post the url for you:
https://i.ibb.co/C5fW0wd/skynews-women-midterms-4475644.jpg
oh yeah, sky news. womens midterms. what a shocking coincidencee!
oh yeah, thats right. the picture you posted, from the sky news video article i posted of a womens march for voting rights during the 2018 midterms. almost a whole MONTH after kavanaugh was appointed. this had nothing to do with justice kavanaugh being sworn in.
you chuds are terrible at spewing your fake news garbage. and still look at you trying to spin.
i mean now, in your own words, this picture is from "when democrats were trying to interrupt Brett Kavanaugh's swearing in." and all right? are you going to stick with your story or are you going to try to change it again?? heres your chance to own me right here chud. provide a source where another video containing this image was also uploaded, dated before november 3rd. surely there oughtta be lots, considering kavanaugh was sworn in on october 6th 2018, and they had a whole month to post stories, pictures, and videos about that little 'insurrection against kavanaugh' or whatever.
so anyways, i guess Sky.com must have stolen a video from some other article about "when democrats were trying to interrupt Brett Kavanaugh's swearing in." which you posted a still image of, and they must have used it to make a story about a bunch of womens voting activists demonstrating during the 2018 midterms, which happened a month after kavanaugh was sworn in . go ahead and provide the original source of the website containing the same video that Sky news obviously stole it from and changed the entire narrative of the picture you posted with that fascinating URL. go ahead rube. i'll wait.
surely youll be able to find more sources for live video containing that exact same still image you posted, dated before november 3rd and all. it cant be that hard for you to find right? surely it exists somewhere on the internet! but oddly enough, due to internet censorship i can only assume, it won't be in any articles pertaining to justice kavanaugh right?