No, although you all sound the same.
You've droned on for quite some time stating that the federal government should be allowed to compel private businesses to host content even if they believe it to be false. That's because they are social media companies, and you are working with a really shitty definition of "publisher."
So you believe that one media company should be compelled to host dishonest content, but feel that Newsmax here is allowed to silence anyone they believe is lying (even though the guy was just giving his opinion on Trump's withdrawal, and not actually lying).
So how do you distinguish between these two completely contradictory opinions.?