Crime NSW police strip searching minors.

My very first thought.
And as a parent what recourse does one have? My initial instinct of course is to beat them into comas, but then of you just end up dead or in the clink for the rest of your life.

I understand trying to keep kids off drugs, but at what price? I can't imagine how traumatizing it must be as a teenage girl to have some fat pedo 3 finger fucking you "trying to find drugs".

What bothers me the most though is that it seems like part of a larger pattern. I know that sounds paranoid, CT, whatever but it just seems like this sort of shit is happening way too often and more frequently. It's also disturbing how society seems to be becoming conditioned to it.
At least someone is normal in this thread. The responses in this thread show just how preconditioned people actually are.
 
Not sure what exsctly is going on there, but very rarely do you find drugs on 33% of teens searched and hail thst as meaningless.

1 in 3 minors they search were carrying drugs? 33%? That is total justification for searches...

Not sure what exsctly is going on there, but very rarely do you find drugs on 33% of teens searched and hail thst as meaningless.

They use sniffer dogs, they're not just randomly picking out kids from the line to get in and strip searching them.

67% of teens strip searched are due to false positives.

Pretty reprehensible. I've never heard of any teaching institution giving a pass mark for 33% correct.
 
Are they legit making these teens strip nude, or telling them to take off their hat and coat?
 
They use sniffer dogs, they're not just randomly picking out kids from the line to get in and strip searching them.

67% of teens strip searched are due to false positives.

Pretty reprehensible. I've never heard of any teaching institution giving a pass mark for 33% correct.
Are they trying to gain access to something or are they just minding their own business in public. The OP is lacking some details.
 
Sources were posted, are you just going to ignore that because it doesn't fit your narrative

Not sure if serious. You know coffee is a drug right.
the narrative is, you dont know how to use a computer.
but want to use one to be outraged about something.
you claim this something is fact, and cite yourself as the source.
but idiots arent good sources.
 
Music festivals.
The venue and event ownership can require the searches then. People are probably more pissed off about getting their drugs stolen then they are about getting searched. The drugs are probably more damaging long term. The false positives are probably because the animals smell something in their clothes. That sounds like an astonishingly high number of kids smuggling drugs into the festival though.
 
How would you like your thirteen year old daughter strip searched and groped by some dyhk copper, because a sniffer dog false alerted.

If I was a Muslim and they broke her hymen they would owe me a LOT of money.
 
The venue and event ownership can require the searches then. People are probably more pissed off about getting their drugs stolen then they are about getting searched. The drugs are probably more damaging long term. The false positives are probably because the animals smell something in their clothes. That sounds like an astonishingly high number of kids smuggling drugs into the festival though.

No it doesn't.

Where do you get astonishingly high number of kids bringing drugs from?

There's no data on how many kids are smuggling drugs into festivals in this thread at all.

33% success rate of people stopped by dogs gives no indication of haw many people are bringing drugs in what so ever. If they searched 10 people then that's 3 people they caught.

You don't have a clue how many drugs are there.



Secondly do you really think that marijuana is more damaging than a fucking cavity search? Really?

You may like having authoritarian figures unwillingly sticking digits into your ass without your consent but for the vast majority of people that is an extremely traumatic experience. Generally speaking digital rape of children is frowned upon even more than drugs.
 
No it doesn't.

Where do you get astonishingly high number of kids bringing drugs from?

There's no data on how many kids are smuggling drugs into festivals in this thread at all.

33% success rate of people stopped by dogs gives no indication of haw many people are bringing drugs in what so ever. If they searched 10 people then that's 3 people they caught.

You don't have a clue how many drugs are there.



Secondly do you really think that marijuana is more damaging than a fucking cavity search? Really?

You may like having authoritarian figures unwillingly sticking digits into your ass without your consent but for the vast majority of people that is an extremely traumatic experience. Generally speaking digital rape of children is frowned upon even more than drugs.
If it was random searches on the street, I would 100% agree with you. You are right that I don't know much, since the OP doesn't know how to copy and paste a hyperlink. There is no reference to show what type of drugs they are intercepting or whether or not they are really perusing with common "cavity searches." The left only hates "authoritarian" behavior when in inhibits their ability to do nefarious shit. They love "authoritarian" behavior when it allows them to target and destroy their political opponents. lol
 
Also what a pathetic bunch you are these days, when you can't take someone's word at face value these days. It's just shows what a pack of lying scumbags you'll are.
Easy grandpa you’ll get a heart attack

it also bothers me that you knew how to use color tags but not ctrl+c

i don’t think you’re a real grandma on second thought

ts:

 
Easy grandpa you’ll get a heart attack

it also bothers me that you knew how to use color tags but not ctrl+c

i don’t think you’re a real grandma on second thought

ts:



You should have seen what she did to me after the video stops.
That chick could suck a basketball through a garden hose. :p
 
If it was random searches on the street, I would 100% agree with you. You are right that I don't know much, since the OP doesn't know how to copy and paste a hyperlink. There is no reference to show what type of drugs they are intercepting or whether or not they are really perusing with common "cavity searches." The left only hates "authoritarian" behavior when in inhibits their ability to do nefarious shit. They love "authoritarian" behavior when it allows them to target and destroy their political opponents. lol

There are links in the thread...

The right is supposed to be about personal responsibility and minimal government interference in our day to day lives.

Unless of course you consume something they don't agree with in which case they're willing to digitally penetrate children to stop it. Or turn the "land of the free" into the most incarcerated country on the planet.

The whole left/right thing is stupid. I'm so glad my country has the preferential voting system.

6 kids..
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02...t-good-life-lost-city-music-festival/11992088
 
There are links in the thread...

The right is supposed to be about personal responsibility and minimal government interference in our day to day lives.
They are. Including allowing private enterprises to figure out their own security needs and concerns. I don't want to be searched everywhere I go either. I will avoid venues that I feel are too invasive.

Unless of course you consume something they don't agree with in which case they're willing to digitally penetrate children to stop it. Or turn the "land of the free" into the most incarcerated country on the planet.
This is of course pure projection. I certainly don't agree with "penetration of children," but what is your alternative solution to keeping illegal drugs off of private property/leased property? There is real liability for the vendor when tons of kids are smuggling drugs into the venue (via their assholes).

The whole left/right thing is stupid. I'm so glad my country has the preferential voting system.

6 kids..
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02...t-good-life-lost-city-music-festival/11992088
It's unfortunate we have lost control of our kids. What is your solution?
 
They are. Including allowing private enterprises to figure out their own security needs and concerns. I don't want to be searched everywhere I go either. I will avoid venues that I feel are too invasive.


This is of course pure projection. I certainly don't agree with "penetration of children," but what is your alternative solution to keeping illegal drugs off of private property/leased property? There is real liability for the vendor when tons of kids are smuggling drugs into the venue (via their assholes).


It's unfortunate we have lost control of our kids. What is your solution?

This'll be a long read. If there was a simple solution there wouldn't be a problem. Actually I think the solution is rather simple but the horror stories of drugs have been pushed so much people are unable to look at it objectively.

First step is to realize there is no solution that will stop people taking drugs. Or even kids from taking them completely.


I think we can drastically decrease drug use and dependence if we start looking at this objectively rather than emotionally.

We have three drugs that are legal, coffee which is pretty benign. Children buy it legally.

Alcohol, which kills about two million people annually, contributes to a lot of violent crime and is actually pretty addictive.

Tobacco which kills 7 million and is highly addictive, a drug that is up there with some of the worst illegal drugs.


Then we have a group of about 1000 illegal drugs (the ones you've heard about are just a tip of the iceberg) that have been banned because of their psychoactive nature. In among that thousand you'll find drugs that are worse than tobacco, you'll find drugs that are worse than alcohol but safer than tobacco and you'll find drugs that are worse than coffee but safer than alcohol.

Hell there might even be psychoactive drugs that are safer than coffee.

So first step would be to admit that drug prohibition as we know it is not based on how safe or unsafe these drugs are.

Obviously that should change.

Second step would be to admit that banning drugs hasn't really decreased their use. If anything the majority of data states the opposite.

My solution? The state takes over drug dealing.

Kinda sounds crazy but drug dependency isn't a profitable business for government. The medical costs, lost labor costs etc will outweigh any revenue made on a new system or taxes received under the current system.

With illegal drug dealing still highly illegal and the state offering legal, regulated drugs without dangerous adulterants the illegal drug market will be decimated as the risk to reward ratio is smashed.

This in itself will drastically reduce kids ability to get drugs because drug dealers will be government payed without any incentive to sell drugs to kids and serious disincentives like jail.

The drawback is that I think for this to be really effective the state needs to legalize and regulate every street drug with a substantial market. This includes the heroins and the crystal meths.

This sounds scary but if you legalize and readily supply a whole bunch of the formerly illegal drugs that are safer than alcohol along with the other street drugs you instantly have a mathematical advantage.

If there's 40 legal drugs, 15 are common street drugs and 25 are "new" drugs that are safer and less addictive the odds are just on chance alone people will be less likely to take them.

Then you have massive advantage in that people don't want to be drug addicts, or die and given the option they'll flock to the new safer less addictive drugs over all the common street drugs let alone the heroins or the crystal meths.

Even better yet once the market is controlled you can implement and effectively monitor and compare policies in different states aimed at further deterring people from taking crystal meth or heroin or whatever else.

Sure meths legal, but you need to see a addiction specialist once a year to get the license required, or the price goes up .5% more than inflation while everything else increases at inflation.

Literally any hair brained idea can be implemented and it's effectiveness assessed.


Drug prohibition started in the 1930's. It's coming up on 90 years.

I think you give my system 90 years meth is no longer a thing. It's not illegal but with safer, cheaper alternatives that are less hassle to buy and 9 decades of trial and error of strategies to decrease meths use the demand will be so low that they just won't be produced anymore.

That's the solution.
 
Easy grandpa you’ll get a heart attack

it also bothers me that you knew how to use color tags but not ctrl+c

i don’t think you’re a real grandma on second thought

ts:



HOW TO PAY HIER VOOR!?
 
Back
Top