- Joined
- Jan 21, 2010
- Messages
- 1,980
- Reaction score
- 975
Good point about the orthodox vs southpaw comparison. Mendes used counters to set up a couple of his takedowns in the fight, I think RDA will be able to use the same tactic. I see RDA as being able to wrestle effectively when pressuring, or to counter pressure. McGregor really pressed at Mendes a number of times which got him taken down a couple times, too like I mentioned previously. Conor will backup at some point unless he instantly blasts him like Aldo (anythings's possible).Well again, it comes down to the wrestling and how Mendes and RDA differ in the application. Mendes gets in on the hips out in the open and turns a sharp corner to score all the takedowns. Also good to keep in mind that scoring these types of takedows is made easier by Mendes being orthodox and McGregor a southpaw.
As far as I can remember, RDA has always relied on backing guys up, duck down to get in on the hips and pull them out from underneath against the cage. This is not the best takedown style to have against a ring general the likes of Conor, who is not going to back up.
I do think RDA's top game is better though.
I don't think there is any disputing who has a better top game between RDA and Mendes. RDA is a whole different beast.
I suspect that is what a lot of people are doing. Pettis has paper-mache takedown defence. There are some things to be learned from the fight about RDA, but it's certainly not as simple as A = B. My preference for RDA is rooted in him being the underdog, I see it as a toss up essentially. Like someone else said, very real possibility of one guy straight up destroying the other because of their styles.I'm fully expecting a lot of casuals to say "Pettis and Conor are similar" lol