Prime Brett Rogers vs ngannou

Roger's by KO.

Francis Nogroundgameou is an overrated UFC hypejob.
 
MikeMcMann said:
So do you guys all still stand behind your prior posts?

----------
















--------------------



----------------------
Click to expand...

Lol he lost to the champ and top 5 guy in Lewis ya schmuck. He wasn’t losing to mehman, Erokin, and ufc rejects de fries and Sanchez. Different levels dipstick.
 
JBJISGOAT said:
Lol he lost to the champ and top 5 guy in Lewis ya schmuck. He wasn’t losing to mehman, Erokin, and ufc rejects de fries and Sanchez. Different levels dipstick.
Click to expand...

He isn't losing to them yet but if he fights like how he did Lewis he very well would lose to them...
 
grimballer said:
rogers was that Scary big hw with power. He was finishing opponents in 1st round (including top 5 hw at the time in 20 seconds) n also dominated ufc top hw lesnar in sparring sessions.

The guy looked unstoppable until he faced fedor. He did well 1st round, but then fedor ko him in 2nd

After that his confidence seemed to have vanished. He didn’t looked comfortable vs Overeem in his very next fight n got finished quick.

After that he had all sort of personal problems like divorce n gay rumours n could never bounce back.

However at 10-0 mark he looked unstopppbe, just like ngannou (11-1).

So if 10-0 Rogers was to take on 11-1 ngannou, who takes it n how?
Click to expand...
Rogers was working part time at Costco when he was fighting
 
JBJISGOAT said:
Lol he lost to the champ and top 5 guy in Lewis ya schmuck. He wasn’t losing to mehman, Erokin, and ufc rejects de fries and Sanchez. Different levels dipstick.
Click to expand...
It is not about who he lost to you dipshit but who he beat on his way to title shot. I am comparing them in there run up to their title shots. Rogers lost to no one in that time frame and Ngannou did lose a fight. Ngannou has plenty of time to lose to bums now after his loss to the champ and if he does we can then compare their post title shot runs.

So again the whole point, if that is still going over your head, is that up to the title shots those saying that Ngannou had accomplished and done way more than Rogers and the two were not comparble were wrong. In their post title shots ruins that is still to be determined. Ngannou obviously has the chance to do better but we have not seen it yet.
 
JBJISGOAT said:
lol you are such a troll. Ngannou has at least 3 top 10 wins while Rogers has 1 fluke top 10 win. Gtfo clown boy!
Click to expand...
Ngannou has 2 top 10 wins. Arlvoski and Overeem, who have been knocked out a combined 23 times in their careers.
 
MikeMcMann said:
It is not about who he lost to you dipshit but who he beat on his way to title shot. I am comparing them in there run up to their title shots. Rogers lost to no one in that time frame and Ngannou did lose a fight. Ngannou has plenty of time to lose to bums now after his loss to the champ and if he does we can then compare their post title shot runs.

So again the whole point, if that is still going over your head, is that up to the title shots those saying that Ngannou had accomplished and done way more than Rogers and the two were not comparble were wrong. In their post title shots ruins that is still to be determined. Ngannou obviously has the chance to do better but we have not seen it yet.
Click to expand...

Hey shit for brains…I will break it down simple for you:

3 top 10 wins > 1 fluke top 10 win.

End thread.
 
Taric said:
Ngannou has 2 top 10 wins. Arlvoski and Overeem, who have been knocked out a combined 23 times in their careers.
Click to expand...

So double Rogers top 10 wins plus he beat Blaydes who is top 5 now and next in like for a title shot. This is not comparable.
 
JBJISGOAT said:
Hey shit for brains…I will break it down simple for you:

3 top 10 wins > 1 fluke top 10 win.

End thread.
Click to expand...
That is not how you break things down shit for brains. This is how you break things down.

Prior to their HW Title shots Rogers was 10-0 with all his wins via (t)KO finishes. Rogers best and only notable win was over a Prime Andre Arlovski who had only suffered losses to the champ of the UFC and SF in the midst of a 11 fight win streak.

Comparatively Ngannou throughout his first 10 fights had one loss and no notable wins. On his 11 fight however he beat the same Andre Arlovski 8 years later and well past his prime run.

So when comparing Rogers and Ngannou pre their title shots and Rogers at 10 fights and Ngannou at 11 Rogers still had the the edge with the better big notable win.

On Ngannou's 12 fight, which was his last before his title shot he got his second big name win in Overeem, again a fighter well past his prime and who most think should have retired like AA before Ngannou fought both. But with that win and that win ONLY you can then and ONLY THEN argue Ngannou's pre title shot record was better than Rogers. But only by a little bit due to the guys being so old and so much past their prime.


So there, now that is you how you break things down you shit for brains.
 
MikeMcMann said:
That is not how you break things down shit for brains. This is how you break things down.

Prior to their HW Title shots Rogers was 10-0 with all his wins via (t)KO finishes. Rogers best and only notable win was over a Prime Andre Arlovski who had only suffered losses to the champ of the UFC and SF in the midst of a 11 fight win streak.

Comparatively Ngannou throughout his first 10 fights had one loss and no notable wins. On his 11 fight however he beat the same Andre Arlovski 8 years later and well past his prime run.

So when comparing Rogers and Ngannou pre their title shots and Rogers at 10 fights and Ngannou at 11 Rogers still had the the edge with the better big notable win.

On Ngannou's 12 fight, which was his last before his title shot he got his second big name win in Overeem, again a fighter well past his prime and who most think should have retired like AA before Ngannou fought both. But with that win and that win ONLY you can then and ONLY THEN argue Ngannou's pre title shot record was better than Rogers. But only by a little bit due to the guys being so old and so much past their prime.


So there, now that is you how you break things down you shit for brains.
Click to expand...

LMAO you are an imbecile. Rogers was still in his prime 14 fights into his career, exactly how many fights Ngannou has. Both 11-3 at 14 fights HOWEVER Ngannou has WAY better wins in Alistair, Blaydes, and AA...shit Ngannous 6th best win would be Rogers 2nd best win. Stop being a fucking imbecile!
 
MikeMcMann said:
JayE do you still think it is a crazy idea? Still think Ngannou's career at this point and a similar point in Rogers career do not compare and that Ngannou has accomplished and done way more?
Click to expand...
Yes
 
MikeMcMann said:
That is not how you break things down shit for brains. This is how you break things down.

Prior to their HW Title shots Rogers was 10-0 with all his wins via (t)KO finishes. Rogers best and only notable win was over a Prime Andre Arlovski who had only suffered losses to the champ of the UFC and SF in the midst of a 11 fight win streak.

Comparatively Ngannou throughout his first 10 fights had one loss and no notable wins. On his 11 fight however he beat the same Andre Arlovski 8 years later and well past his prime run.

So when comparing Rogers and Ngannou pre their title shots and Rogers at 10 fights and Ngannou at 11 Rogers still had the the edge with the better big notable win.

On Ngannou's 12 fight, which was his last before his title shot he got his second big name win in Overeem, again a fighter well past his prime and who most think should have retired like AA before Ngannou fought both. But with that win and that win ONLY you can then and ONLY THEN argue Ngannou's pre title shot record was better than Rogers. But only by a little bit due to the guys being so old and so much past their prime.


So there, now that is you how you break things down you shit for brains.
Click to expand...
Again Rogers had 20 seconds in the cage prior to his title shot against a capable opponent. Ngannou had a LOT more time to measure him against legit opponents. That’s not arguable. And that’s all Rogers has. The 20 secs against aa.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,401
Messages
55,417,820
Members
174,763
Latest member
ThroughTheDakr

Share this page

Back
Top