Elections Pro-life GOP senate candidate paid for girlfriend to get an abortion

Spoken like a true trupmtard!
It’s the first stage.
Stage one it’s fake news then they eventually work there way to so what if it’s true what about insert a democrat that did something shitty and I am still voting for him because he is better than any socialist communist, baby blood drinking liberal. Having an ethos is not allowed in binary politics.
One thing I will give the MAGA movement credit for is turning the phrase family values into a punchline. Taking the Christian high road on any political issue is so hypocritical it makes me shake my head and laugh every time.
 
Does he vote prolife and raise campaign funds? That is all that matters.

Not even pro-lifers seem to support his anti-abortion position. He continues to insist on no exceptions specifically including abortion to save the life of the mother. He would quite literally legally require a woman with a non-viable fetus to die or a woman with an ectopic pregnancy die. He is as nuts as the very few pro-choicers advocating for late term abortions.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was cool that Walker had some MMA fights so late in life. I would had liked to see him fight a couple more times. I dont agree with any of his politics, i also dont think he is very smart. I dont hate the man, and have a bit of sympathy for his mental health struggles. He is a horrible candidate and should never hold office.
 
Yes, 100%. And the mother and the doctor.

We need to be building prisons in this country.

Yes, clearly that's what we need. We've got some of the highest rates of crime in the developed world and the highest rates of incarceration, clearly what we're doing is working so well we just need to do more of it.

Are you mentally challenged?
 
Yes, clearly that's what we need. We've got some of the highest rates of crime in the developed world and the highest rates of incarceration, clearly what we're doing is working so well we just need to do more of it.

Are you mentally challenged?

No, unlike you, I've actually done some reading about it. The surefire way to decrease crime (as demonstrated from 1992- recently) is to incarcerate or otherwise immobilize the 1-2% of the population that commits serious crimes and to not release them until they are too old to go back to it. As of now, there is only about 1.3 million people in prison in the US, out of a population of 330 million, so that amount would need to double, at least, to see crime brought down. It would be possible to have Japanese levels of safety in this country.

I for one think that the rate is probably higher than the 1-2%, it might be closer to 5%, but there's zero reason that people who commit serious crimes can't essentially live in penal colonies, work, make money, buy things on Amazon, etc. They just need to be tightly supervised and walled off from the rest of the population.
 
I don't think I would like to vote for him but it would depend on whom he was running against and how much damage they would do to what I believe in.

Sometimes you have to do what you don't want.
 
I don't think I would like to vote for him but it would depend on whom he was running against and how much damage they would do to what I believe in.

Sometimes you have to do what you don't want.
His opponent is Raphael Wornock. Politically, he's somewhere between establishment Democrats and the left wing of the Party. As leftists, we know he's not one of us, but we also know he's not our enemy and he's not actively trying to obstruct us like Pelosi or Schumer or the Democrats further to the right of them like Manchin, Sinema or Cuellar.

If you're familiar with @Strychnine, I'd say Warnock has a similar worldview and personal beliefs. Like a lot of African Americans who are devout Christians and have some religious and cultural affinities with white evangelicals, but a VERY different way of expressing them politically. I believe Strychnine is from Georgia, just like Warnock. And Marjorie Taylor Greene for that matter.

I think Warnock is a more serious and devout Christian than self-identified Christian nationalist Marjorie Taylor Greene. The woman shamed her husband and made a mockery of their marriage by cheating on him openly, and eventually he had enough and filed to divorce her. There's no evidence that suggests that Warnock is a wife beater, deadbeat dad, child abuser, or paid for abortions like Walker has.

Warnock is a person who grew up in poverty in a housing project as one of 12 siblings, but his parents were preachers and provided a stable home life for him. Warnock worked hard to make something of himself, he got a bachelor's degree in psychology at a secular university and then got a master's and a PhD at a seminary and followed his parents' footsteps in becoming a reverend.

Honestly, even as someone who strongly supports left-wing policies and politicians, if you swapped out their positions, I would have a hard time voting for someone who was as inarticulate and unintelligent as Walker and who has such profound character flaws and criminal history as he does. Walker doesn't even deny pointing a loaded gun at his ex-wife and threatening to kill her, or holding a straight razor to her throat, but claims he doesn't remember these incidents and blames them on his dissociative identity disorder.

We don't need someone with his lack of intelligence, lack of personal control, lack of taking responsibility for his own actions, history of mental illness, history of domestic violence, history of child abuse, neglecting his children, etc. in a position of power and importance. If Walker were on my side, I would have to sit that one out, or vote 3rd party or a write-in vote.

Thankfully, Democrats haven't steeped as low as the Republicans have in recent years when it comes to candidates. I would acknowledge and act accordingly if they did, because being a principled person is a matter of great importance to me. We should have HIGHER standards for our representatives, not LOWER. There are ex-cons who have more remorse and responsibility for their actions than Walker who either deflects or denies. That's why his son Christian publicly turned on him, because he's fed up with the lies and the hypocrisy.

Christian-Walker.png


chris2.jpg






By the way, Christian Walker is a conservative Christian. He's not doing this because he's a liberal atheist who's opposed to his father politically. He supports Republican politicians, but he's sick of lying/lying by omission about who his father is.



I don't like DeSantis but the difference between someone like DeSantis and Walker is that DeSantis is intelligent, articulate, he doesn't mistreat women and children based on what we know, he's not mentally ill, he doesn't show signs of having CTE. I don't like DeSantis, but DeSantis is fit for public office. Walker simply is not.
 
True, I was just mimicking the bad rhetoric.

However, I strongly believe that everyone involved in the butchery of children should be in jail or sentenced to death, no exceptions. There are many people like me and they are responding to that, which is what the process is supposed to do, right?

So if you honestly believe the bolded above, does that mean that Herschel Walker gets a pass for paying for an abortion in 2009?

He literally paid someone to "butcher a child". Yet that's ok because it was 2009? If I commit a regular murder in 2009, do I get a pass in 2022 just because?

If what you and others are responding to has everything to do with children and the said butchery of, I would think that a logically consistent person would be calling for Herschel Walker's head given his participation in the act in 2009. And maybe you personally would like to see him pay for "butchering children", but I highly, highly doubt the people who are anti-abortion and pro Herschel Walker see it that way, meaning they don't truly think that "abortion is murder". If they did, they would be condemning Walker for participating in a murder 10 years ago.
 
So if you honestly believe the bolded above, does that mean that Herschel Walker gets a pass for paying for an abortion in 2009?

He literally paid someone to "butcher a child". Yet that's ok because it was 2009? If I commit a regular murder in 2009, do I get a pass in 2022 just because?

If what you and others are responding to has everything to do with children and the said butchery of, I would think that a logically consistent person would be calling for Herschel Walker's head given his participation in the act in 2009. And maybe you personally would like to see him pay for "butchering children", but I highly, highly doubt the people who are anti-abortion and pro Herschel Walker see it that way.

I don't live in Georgia so I don't have a say, but I certainly wouldn't vote for someone who did that, and yes, he should be in jail.
 
I don't live in Georgia so I don't have a say, but I certainly wouldn't vote for someone who did that, and yes, he should be in jail.

I can appreciate that you personally may be thinking in a logically consistent manner. However, somehow I don't think the people screaming "abortion is murder" truly believe that, otherwise they would be calling for Walker's head on a stick for having participated in a murder in 2009.
 
I don't live in Georgia so I don't have a say, but I certainly wouldn't vote for someone who did that, and yes, he should be in jail.
Just out of curiosity how far does this belief extend?
All politicians and servicemen/woman that vote to bomb countries maiming and killing children ie. in Iraq?
Mass shooters obviously? NRA and lobbyist who facilitate child murder?
 
Just out of curiosity how far does this belief extend?
All politicians and servicemen/woman that vote to bomb countries maiming and killing children ie. in Iraq?
Mass shooters obviously? NRA and lobbyist who facilitate child murder?

You can extend it as far as you like, but I'm against "freedom of speech" as its currently incarnated, and certain immoral acts which are contrary to the health of the people (in the broadest sense) should be subject to censorship, which should include criminal penalties for attempting to corrupt the public morals. People used to intuitively understand this- in our country, in the 19th century they simply attacked or tarred and feathered such people, and the government did nothing to interfere. In Athens they executed Socrates for teaching the youth to disregard the religious traditions of the city. The idea that we must have open gates to every kind of insane idea is ludicrous on its face and must stop. This is why you are now seeing open advocates for extremely taboo things emerging around the world- there are no consequences.
 
Oh whatever Trumper ! Walker is the only person to flip flop on a position and no one else. So join in on the hate fest and post memes

post like 10 gifs and something from someone on Twitter and be like OMG this made me LOL

Not really about flip-flopping. Is abortion murder or not? If not, should we maybe not treat as such legally? Also, what do you think about domestic abuse and terrorizing your family? Not a good thing to do, is it?
 
True, I was just mimicking the bad rhetoric.

However, I strongly believe that everyone involved in the butchery of children should be in jail or sentenced to death, no exceptions. There are many people like me and they are responding to that, which is what the process is supposed to do, right?
You and the Taliban have a lot in common
 
No, unlike you, I've actually done some reading about it. The surefire way to decrease crime (as demonstrated from 1992- recently) is to incarcerate or otherwise immobilize the 1-2% of the population that commits serious crimes and to not release them until they are too old to go back to it. As of now, there is only about 1.3 million people in prison in the US, out of a population of 330 million, so that amount would need to double, at least, to see crime brought down. It would be possible to have Japanese levels of safety in this country.

I for one think that the rate is probably higher than the 1-2%, it might be closer to 5%, but there's zero reason that people who commit serious crimes can't essentially live in penal colonies, work, make money, buy things on Amazon, etc. They just need to be tightly supervised and walled off from the rest of the population.
Japan has 41 prisoners per 100 000 people

U.S.A has 639 prisoners per 100 000 people

So to reach Japanese crime rates as an ideal standard, U.S.A needs to reach 1250 prisoners per 100 000?


.......

.......

Really?
 
You can extend it as far as you like, but I'm against "freedom of speech" as its currently incarnated, and certain immoral acts which are contrary to the health of the people (in the broadest sense) should be subject to censorship, which should include criminal penalties for attempting to corrupt the public morals. People used to intuitively understand this- in our country, in the 19th century they simply attacked or tarred and feathered such people, and the government did nothing to interfere. In Athens they executed Socrates for teaching the youth to disregard the religious traditions of the city. The idea that we must have open gates to every kind of insane idea is ludicrous on its face and must stop. This is why you are now seeing open advocates for extremely taboo things emerging around the world- there are no consequences.
You completely ignored my question and raised an entirely unrelated but fascinating quandy

"This is why you are now seeing open advocates for extremely taboo things emerging around the world- there are no consequences."

For example?
 
Ahh big Hersh
More in-

How someone this hypocritical, brutish and dumb can be a top republican candidate is baffling and sadly says a lot about the Trump era republicans


Woman at center of Herschel Walker abortion firestorm says she also had a child of his: report

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hersch...oman-says-she-also-had-his-child-daily-beast/
Lol, it's the mother of one of his children and yet he pretended like he didn't know who it was? Is he seriously that retarded or brain damaged or what's going on?
 
Back
Top