Thanks for the response. I’ll start with caveat that nothing I’m about to say is meant to invalidate your POV, but rather to offer perspective from the other political side.
—I agree that I don’t like the term “hunted.” It’s a pretty loaded term, and I think it does more harm than good. That said, I do want to point out that it’s not just “the left” that says this.
Here, the term was used by a Brooklyn police officer, who said he felt as though he were hunting them because a commander had told him (and other officers) to ignore whites and Asians more often, and instead and arrest more blacks and Hispanics. He literally says, “I got tired of hunting black and Hispanic people.” Is that indicative of all police officers? Of course not. But it’s also not a term used for no reason.
—I’m not sick of hearing about systemic racism, I’m tired of one side pretending it doesn’t exist and showing no inclination to help fix it. I posted links earlier showing discrimination in a variety of “systems”: the justice system, housing, employment, etc. As long as this exists, it needs to be discussed and addressed. It bothers me that there are a lot of people in this country who turn a blind eye to it because they’re “sick of hearing about it.”
I wanted to return to this, and her use of the word insidious in the first video. You’ve characterized her as saying that “nice racism” is worse than overt racism. You also acknowledged that interpretation depends on the context of insidious. From about 1:00-1:15 she says that we’re all familiar with overt acts like slurs, but “there are more subtle manifestations, and because they are more subtle they are more insidious.” So it seems clear to me what the context is. These are harmful acts that are hard to combat because they are subtle and exist under the surface. Not only did you not take it that way though, but you invented scenarios and attributed them to her (e.g.,nice racism being worse than calling someone the N-word). Likewise in the 2nd video, “it’s not your fault you’re racist, you just are” isn’t something I hear her say, or imply.
If I may offer a sincere criticism: You are certainly not obligated to like her or agree with her, but some of the things that seem to bother you the most are your own interpretation, or even creation. She doesn’t seem to be espousing the things that you are accusing her of espousing.