*Rate my parlay: Which bet do you think is the weakest link?*

for you and all other new bettors.
parlays are sucker bets with ufc.
most sites allow live wagering. there is no reason for a parlay with this being the case.
a parlay is more meant for multiple wagers on lines active at the same time. "still a suckers bet"

break it down for you.

if you were to wager
5$ on the santos fight.
THEN take the earning and original bet from 1st wager and put it all on the 2nd wager "aljo not itd"
THEN take the winnings and original profit and bet and all in on izz/jan
THEN the same with last fight.
you end up with the same risk/reward/profit. the difference is
if you DO NOT parlay. you have TOTAL control over your bets and then you can decide if you really want to risk all of your earnings and keep going "all in" on all 4 wagers.

not to try to school you, just trying to look out for the fellow sherbros donating money to the bookies
The betting site I use won't allow all the same array of bets close to fight time. So I can't do that. Plus, we all know some bad bets come when u have won a couple and u got the profits. I can't, but even if I could.
 
Thiago Santos NOT WINNING inside the distance
+
Aljo NOT WINNING inside the distance
+
Amanda/Megan goes past Rd1
+
Izzy/Jan goes past Rd1


You'll get $380 per $100 bet.

What do you think of my parlay? Whose most likely to make me lose my money?

Lost, as always
 
Lost, as always

Although he went 2-2, I'd say 3 of the 4 picks were very safe.

- Santos is pretty much shot due to his past injuries, was very unlikely he'd finish Rakic.
- Aljo winning "by finish" aka the DQ was a total fluke
- Amanda / Megan going past round 1 was his only "bad" pick, can't count on Megan to survive very long against the GOAT.
- Izzy / Jan going past round 1 was expected due to their durability and the generally slower starts to their fights.
 
Although he went 2-2, I'd say 3 of the 4 picks were very safe.

- Santos is pretty much shot due to his past injuries, was very unlikely he'd finish Rakic.
- Aljo winning "by finish" aka the DQ was a total fluke
- Amanda / Megan going past round 1 was his only "bad" pick, can't count on Megan to survive very long against the GOAT.
- Izzy / Jan going past round 1 was expected due to their durability and the generally slower starts to their fights.

He went 1-3. Aljo did not win a decision. Only one he got right was Izzy/Jan going past 1 round. But he technically got none right, since he needed all 4 to be right to win. He's always suckered into parlay bets and loses every time, per his past bet threads.
 
He went 1-3. Aljo did not win a decision. Only one he got right was Izzy/Jan going past 1 round. But he technically got none right, since he needed all 4 to be right to win. He's always suckered into parlay bets and loses every time, per his past bet threads.

Nah read his bets again, he got 2 right


Thiago Santos NOT WINNING inside the distance - WIN ✓ - Rakic by decision counts as Santos NOT WINNING inside the distance. Odds should've been about -285
+
Aljo NOT WINNING inside the distance X LOSS X - DQ counts as inside distance
+
Amanda/Megan goes past Rd1 X LOSS X
+
Izzy/Jan goes past Rd1 ✓ WIN ✓
 
Back
Top