-First off, Biden is in fact senile. The sooner you accept this the better off you be for the next 3 years as mind periodically turns into complete mush. And thats not an completely empty thing to say, considering he's the president of the united states.
Well, first of all, it's not a fact at all, and it's in fact a ridiculous claim (there's no way he could be an incoming president and be senile--the job is too demanding, especially the way he does it). But second of all, it is widely known that consumers of Republican propaganda either believe it or at least believe they're supposed to say it every time his name is brought up. It doesn't add anything to any discussion or bring us closer to understanding any issue for people to mindlessly repeat it all the time. It's just used as a kind of defense against thought.
Also, why not make a prediction about what you expect over the next three years and then we can check it and learn from it? Like, I think this year will probably be the best year for economic growth this century, and we'll continue to see strong growth following, with a lot of the benefits you expect to see from that (falling poverty, for example, rising employment, etc.). What do you predict?
The bonus of this kind of approach is that we get a track record.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/the-war-room-bet-thread-v6.4145653/#post-162527174 We can see who's been full of shit and who's been on the ball in the past.
Now please explain to me how the deflection to trump in every thread regardless of the topic at hand is any better?
Well, first, that doesn't happen. But second:
"If someone were to say, "Biden did X, but Trump had a better approach to achieving the goal that X is intended to achieve," that would be a real post that required knowledge and the application of that knowledge."
If you want examples, its basically a criticism of biden to start with and then we get a empty reversal or deflection of how trump did something simular (not even simular in most cases) Which obviously doesn't exonerate biden of the original critique and completely railroads the whole discussion
Speaking hypothetically, yes, if that were to happen, it wouldn't have any bearing on the original critique. If you point it out at the time, and you're right, I'll agree with it. And similarly, that's not a defense against the constant, mindless repetition of Republican talking points or accusing anyone who thinks critically of being a troll.
