Discussion in 'MMA Betting Discussion' started by EzFlyer, Jan 15, 2017.
And two judges gave Lauzon round 2. FML
where held has his back for 2-3 minutes.. and then each guy had a takedown.. but held controlled lauzon on his but lauzon didn't.
Lol I'll accept that, BJ looked horrible. No harm in having a little nibble at a +350 underdog.
Already happened. According to Ez he was the DanH83 guy in this thread....and got banned after 12 posts lol.
He doesn't lack persistence does Robbie.
he's gone for good. and our Monday morning discussions are already more pleasant.
IP ban?!? Haha he kinda deserves it
Changed your tune
we're all better off.
He'll find a way back. As we speak he's probably busy working on a VPN/proxy solution lol.
I think he had a very valid point about others doing the same, if not worse, than what he was doing but getting away with it. And I still think those who are irritated with him should "ignore" him rather that calling for his head. But he can't keep his emotions in check. I wish he would Bc unlike most of those who constantly whine about him, he had great input on fights. Nothing worse than having some lurker who doesn't contribute anything come in here and be critical. Beggars can't be choosers imo
Devils advocate here....From my understanding the new rules favour damage and the potential for ending the fight. There will be less emphasis on merely holding a dominant position.
Having said that, I can see judges giving Lauzon rounds 1 and 2. Lauzon nearly finished the fight via elbows in r1. And then in the controversial round 2 Lauzon nearly finished the fight with the armbar from bottom. I can see judges (under the new system) giving round 2 to Lauzon based on him nearly finishing the fight in r2 whereas Held just retained position.
Most importantly Held never had Lauzon in a position where he was anywhere near finishing him.
I am not making an argument for Lauzon don't misunderstand me. I am simply trying to understand this new reality we are living in.
his reasoning for his picks made sense more often than not.
because of this, i had no problem with the guy whatsoever
statistically not a lot different than the nijam/holbrook fight
This this this. And yet some guy who doesn't even contribute to the thread has the audacity to beg for him to get banned Bc he got called out on his parlays and his value talk. Whatever, life goes on.
Well done, again, Jesus Christ.
Funny nuff you kinda changed my mind on switching to the o2.5 instead of Saenz.
Very real possibility that they confused the red and blue corner because of the shorts color. Hard to explain it another way. It's that, or we are entering a period of complete uncertainty w the score cards. Pretty terrifying thought...
That's the difference between a sharp and the squares. The ability to entertain multiple thoughts at once, and make adjustments on changing data/prices/etc.
Glad to help. Keep on showing these dudes how it's done.
I like the idea someone suggested itt of rotating the judges throughout the night to keep them sharp. They've got to sit cageside scoring fights for what...5-6 hours? Presumably they're not betting/drinking as much as we are watching it all unfold, must be difficult for them to hold their concentration that long.
I actually think this probably happened.
I could only imagine if I had thousands on Held. I'd be in my car driving to the judges residence as we speak
Separate names with a comma.