- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
- Messages
- 1,082
- Reaction score
- 1,140
Did you even bother to skim thru that link you posted?
Here’s the cliffs - Plaintiff claims Goggins verbally agreed to allow him to make a movie about his life. Goggins changes his mind after reading the guys script, decides to go with someone else to do a book and a movie. Plaintiff gets butthurt and sues David, while also claiming that there are inaccuracies in David’s story. David then countersues for defamation, and plaintiff requests the court dismiss David’s counter suit (the case your link is actually about). The court unequivocally sides with David Goggins, repeatedly stating the plaintiffs arguments fail miserably and Goggins defamation claims are valid in any possible way of interpretation.
@SakurabasEar didn't read the link, just like Crenshaw has never read Coggins book.