Social GoldenWolf's COVID Vaccine/Lockdown Protest megathread

Is this reasonable? or a slippery slope?


  • Total voters
    366
Status
Not open for further replies.
the administration worried that they would be too polarizing for the moment

So it's not that it's problematic, it's that it's not the right time yet. Got it.
 
Wouldn’t be an issue to begin with if people would stop being stupid and get the vaccine

Rofl.

"Pfizer has also grown through aggressive marketing—a practice it pioneered back in the 1950s by purchasing unprecedented advertising spreads in medical journals. In 2009 the company had to pay a record $2.3 billion to settle federal charges that one of its subsidiaries had illegally marketed a painkiller called Bextra. "

"In 2008 Pfizer announced that it was setting aside $894 million to settle the lawsuits that had been filed in connection with Bextra and Celebrex."

https://www.mp-22.com/vax

Lots more there to read.

Imagine blindly trusting these companies with your life, despite the fact they have paid out BILLIONS AND BILLIONS (Thanks Orange Man Bad) in damages.

You can have my shot Sherbro, don't worry.
 
Rofl.

"Pfizer has also grown through aggressive marketing—a practice it pioneered back in the 1950s by purchasing unprecedented advertising spreads in medical journals. In 2009 the company had to pay a record $2.3 billion to settle federal charges that one of its subsidiaries had illegally marketed a painkiller called Bextra. "

"In 2008 Pfizer announced that it was setting aside $894 million to settle the lawsuits that had been filed in connection with Bextra and Celebrex."

https://www.mp-22.com/vax

Lots more there to read.

Imagine blindly trusting these companies with your life, despite the fact they have paid out BILLIONS AND BILLIONS (Thanks Orange Man Bad) in damages.

You can have my shot Sherbro, don't worry.
It’s kind of dumbfounding that this is actually your reasoning
 
Rofl.

"Pfizer has also grown through aggressive marketing—a practice it pioneered back in the 1950s by purchasing unprecedented advertising spreads in medical journals. In 2009 the company had to pay a record $2.3 billion to settle federal charges that one of its subsidiaries had illegally marketed a painkiller called Bextra. "

"In 2008 Pfizer announced that it was setting aside $894 million to settle the lawsuits that had been filed in connection with Bextra and Celebrex."

https://www.mp-22.com/vax

Lots more there to read.

Imagine blindly trusting these companies with your life, despite the fact they have paid out BILLIONS AND BILLIONS (Thanks Orange Man Bad) in damages.

You can have my shot Sherbro, don't worry.

Imagine how much money these companies have paid out over the years to settle lawsuits but now, all of a sudden, we are just supposed to " trust the science ". I took the jab but not taking the second jab due to crazy reaction to the first stupid one
 
Wouldn’t be an issue to begin with if people would stop being stupid and get the vaccine
This,

Imagine having a rona-stuffed anti-vaxxer from Florida or the Sturgis rally infecting everyone else.
 
Maybe or possibly pulling people with out of state tags but that's a pain in the ass.
The infrastructure bill they are trying to pass has something in it about new cars having breathalyzers so people will to be tested before they drive and cameras are watching them drive.
They can just make the cars scan your vaccine card or whatever before it allows you to drive on a highway and they make it law everyone has one of this cars.
 
Last edited:
It’s kind of dumbfounding that this is actually your reasoning

It's dumbfounding that I don't want an experimental, emergency use only authorized, injection from a company that has killed amd injured thousands of people and had to pay BILLIONS of dollars in judgements?

Meanwhile, in Canada, there wasnt a first wave death under the age of 45 without a comorbidity on the death certificate and 94% of deaths were aged 65+.

Hmmmm let me see, trust a company that's obviously not at all trustworthy, or take my chance with a virus that hasn't killed a single healthy person in Canada under the age of 45?

Soooooooo dumbfounding....
 
It's dumbfounding that I don't want an experimental, emergency use only authorized, injection from a company that has killed amd injured thousands of people and had to pay BILLIONS of dollars in judgements?

Meanwhile, in Canada, there wasnt a first wave death under the age of 45 without a comorbidity on the death certificate and 94% of deaths were aged 65+.

Hmmmm let me see, trust a company that's obviously not at all trustworthy, or take my chance with a virus that hasn't killed a single healthy person in Canada under the age of 45?

Soooooooo dumbfounding....
I could sit here and regurgitate all the same arguments we know to be true as to why you should get it but it would be a waste of our time. We both know that you never even considered getting a vaccine. You’re kind was made up by your political ideology. Or more likely, as soon as you saw what others of your ilk were doing.
 
I could sit here and regurgitate all the same arguments we know to be true as to why you should get it but it would be a waste of our time. We both know that you never even considered getting a vaccine. You’re kind was made up by your political ideology. Or more likely, as soon as you saw what others of your ilk were doing.

Or, maybe I'm not pearl clutching over a virus, that again, hasnt killed a SINGLE HEALTHY PERSON IN CANADA UNDER AGE 45.

Continue the hand wringing though, it's cute.
 
It’s kind of dumbfounding that this is actually your reasoning

O1zrZfa.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top