Crime Clinton Lawyer finally charged over Russia-gate hoax.

[Fugazy]

Oh, Seth Rich, right? Kim Dotcom will be providing the evidence any day now, I'm sure.

Meanwhile, the bipartisan Senate Intel committee, the Mueller Report and the intelligence community assessment in 2017, issued by the DNI, with confirmation by the CIA, NSA and FBI, all state, definitively, that it was done by Russia on Putin's orders. All lying?

Who killed Seth Rich?

 

[rearnakedchoke]

So this was all a big nothing burger? Or this is it??

 

[AWilder]

Well if there is a "more reliable" source reporting this information then you should share it.

Are you asking to join reality?

 

[Bald1]

How did this turn into a Covid thread?

Everything turns into an everything thread. The trans kids thread is about racism, the Ukraine thread about Nazis and some retard marketed a pro pedo thread as one about cancel culture.

The meme thread is still just for memes though.

 

[jimjamjammer]

Are you asking to join reality?

Asking to see if you actually have anything to contribute to the thread or are just in here chirping.

 

[Mark McMichael]

You're way to far gone. To YOU I'm a "derp" and considering the source I'm good with that. No point in arguing with you about any of this.
Please, stay safe and wear three masks.

Ya, your view that there is no difference between standing 1ft or 10ft away from someone with covid for a short talk is just nutty.

No point arguing with a derp over that.

 

[Fugazy]

Also interesting how the guy isn't offended by Trump calling Clinton a puppet with no evidence at all. Massive double standard from these guys.

Who in their right mind would be offended by the Clintons being called names? The fuck?

 

[Fugazy]

So you're on the same bullshit train? The question is a red herring, as these trials last years so they can follow residual immunity.

This is what drives me crazy about conservatives, they generate a talking point and stick to it forever, even if it's meaningless.

Anyways, click the link. It references Phase 3 trials from last year. That's why I chose it, even if it's pointless and both of you are just playing games.

Good thing residual immunity only lasts a couple months right?

 

[Fugazy]

Haha wow thanks dude, this definitely does. For an outsider (europe) this whole case of trump and the russians and the Clintons, it’s so hard to follow lol. Also because it’s been dragging for years now and nothing ever really happens.

Anyway thanks for the cliffs. Bobgeese is banned now btw

Heres a tip, as an American to you, European Sherbro.

Don’t bother getting involved. Worry about yourself.

What you hear will almost always be bullshit fed through a filter to make you agree with the person giving it to you.

 

[EndlessCritic]

-Problem is, the only evidence of the "lie," is a piece of inadmissible hearsay (the cocktail napkin), and the testimony of the FBI director who's already contradicted the charge by saying that he's can't remember what exactly Sussman said, and that he could have just concluded that the conference meeting was a genuine chat about a very public topic that Sussman had worked on.

We have a running joke in my office that Americans don't understand what hearsay is. I can assure you what you have described would 100% not be considered hearsay in Canada.

Now I'm beginning to seriously question whether the hearsay rule might somehow be different in America than Canada.

Can you please explain your position as to why the cocktail napkin is "inadmissible hearsay"?

 

[Darkballs]

We have a running joke in my office that Americans don't understand what hearsay is. I can assure you what you have described would 100% not be considered hearsay in Canada.

Now I'm beginning to seriously question whether the hearsay rule might somehow be different in America than Canada.

Can you please explain your position as to why the cocktail napkin is "inadmissible hearsay"?

I guess I should be a bit more thorough in my answer. Should the prosecution call the director to the stand, then they could get the cocktail napkin in to rebut or refresh. However, since said director has already made public statements to the effect that his notes on said cocktail napkin were just his general musings and that he cannot recall Sussman stating that he "Was not working for anyone," I'd say the odds of them calling the a guy who's just gonna either refute their central claim (as he was the only witness to said "lie"), or get immediately smashed by the defense in rebuttal, I'd say the odds of them getting the cocktail napkin in by itself would be near impossible.

In short, 50/50 it would get struck under Federal Rule 1002 if director is gonna testify; otherwise, still retarded to try to admit it.

 

[EndlessCritic]

I guess I should be a bit more thorough in my answer. Should the prosecution call the director to the stand, then they could get the cocktail napkin in to rebut or refresh. However, since said director has already made public statements to the effect that his notes on said cocktail napkin were just his general musings and that he cannot recall Sussman stating that he "Was not working for anyone," I'd say the odds of them calling the a guy who's just gonna either refute their central claim (as he was the only witness to said "lie"), or get immediately smashed by the defense in rebuttal, I'd say the odds of them getting the cocktail napkin in by itself would be near impossible.

In short, 50/50 it would get struck under Federal Rule 1002 if director is gonna testify; otherwise, still retarded to try to admit it.

I confess your response did not in any way dispel my stereotype that Americans use the term "hearsay" to describe things that are manifestly not hearsay.

Also, in Canada, if a business record is prepared contemporaneously, the record is potentially admissible for the truth of its contents even if the author has no memory of making the record. I make no comment on the likelihood of whether the cocktail napkin would be admissible.

 

[giusti825]

well, one side believes epoch times and gateway pundit is a reliable and reputable source of information and the rest of us live in reality.

One side censored a true story coming from a 200 year old media outlet. They clearly care more about the content of the stories than the veracity of the claims or the reliability of the source.

 

[AWilder]

One side censored a true story coming from a 200 year old media outlet. They clearly care more about the content of the stories than the veracity of the claims or the reliability of the source.

one side is only capable of whataboutisms when confronted with facts and reality.

 

[Darkballs]

I confess your response did not in any way dispel my stereotype that Americans use the term "hearsay" to describe things that are manifestly not hearsay.

Also, in Canada, if a business record is prepared contemporaneously, the record is potentially admissible for the truth of its contents even if the author has no memory of making the record. I make no comment on the likelihood of whether the cocktail napkin would be admissible.

So how, under US law, would you get said cocktail napkin into evidence?

Because by itself, without its author testifying, or some exception to his absence, then that cocktail napkin is most certainly hearsay under US law.

 

[EndlessCritic]

So how, under US law, would you get said cocktail napkin into evidence?

Because by itself, without its author testifying, or some exception to his absence, then that cocktail napkin is most certainly hearsay under US law.

Well of course the author would need to testify for it to be admissible (unless he was dead). What makes you sure that he won't be able to?

 

[giusti825]

one side is only capable of whataboutisms when confronted with facts and reality.

"Whataboutism" is an Orwellian double-think term that stupid people use to try and justify an ethical or moral inconsistency with their reasoning.

 

[lilelvis]

Everything turns into an everything thread. The trans kids thread is about racism, the Ukraine thread about Nazis and some retard marketed a pro pedo thread as one about cancel culture.

The meme thread is still just for memes though.

TBH, the meme thread is also the Norse paganism mega-thread.

 

[Bald1]

TBH, the meme thread is also the Norse paganism mega-thread.

@Deorum found his groove. Good for him. Pretty sure he's a druid or something now, so you best be polite or he'll turn you into a beaver or a Canada Bobgoose. This is your first and final warning.

 

[lilelvis]

@Deorum found his groove. Good for him. Pretty sure he's a druid or something now, so you best be polite or he'll turn you into a beaver or a Canada Bobgoose. This is your first and final warning.

Nodak is ok in my very limited book of ok shit.