- Joined
- Oct 21, 2021
- Messages
- 2,178
- Reaction score
- 3,553
Kind of a weird take. He used to be for UBI, but then his friend had trouble hiring people for his restaurant since workers were receiving pandemic unemployment benefits and being more selective about employment, so now he's against it.
He was for it initially on the grounds that it would give people the freedom to pursue things they were passionate about. But then in a situation analogous to UBI (extended and boosted UI benefits), because he doesn't like how they choose to use their freedom (i.e. not working at a restaurant), he now switched his view.
The reason for his switch seems illogical given his initial view, since people are acting consistently with his own initial expectations. Maybe it's just as simple as he doesn't like it because his buddy is struggling, which is a very simplistic manner of evaluating something.
Additionally, I don't think the restaurant industry should be used as a yardstick to measure the success of a UBI-like measure. Its success depends on exploitation. If the economy were strong, restaurants would not be able to hire college-educated workers for pennies on the dollar as they do now. And if not for lax border policies, they wouldn't be able to exploit cheap immigrant labor. It seems like one of the foundations of the restaurant industry in the US is exploitation, without which it would collapse. Pretty shady overall.
Very strange and irrational take by Joe.